Literature DB >> 26586583

Effects of ankle foot orthoses on body functions and activities in people with floppy paretic ankle muscles: a systematic review.

Dymphy van der Wilk1, Pieter Ubele Dijkstra2, Klaas Postema3, Gijsbertus Jacob Verkerke4, Juha Markus Hijmans3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with floppy ankle muscles paresis use ankle foot orthoses to improve their walking ability. Ankle foot orthoses also limit ankle range of motion thereby introducing additional problems. Insight in effects of ankle foot orthoses on body functions and activities in people with floppy paretic ankle muscles aids in clinical decision making and may improve adherence.
METHODS: Studies published before October 27th, 2014, were searched in Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl, and Cochrane Library. Studies evaluating effects of ankle foot orthoses on body functions and/or activities in people with floppy paretic ankle muscles were included. Studies solely focusing on people with spastic paretic ankle muscles were excluded. Study quality was assessed using a custom-made scale. Body functions and activities were defined according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
FINDINGS: Twenty-four studies were included, evaluating 394 participants. Participants were grouped according to paresis type (i) dorsiflexor paresis, (ii) plantar flexor paresis, (iii) both dorsiflexor and plantar flexor paresis. Dorsal, circular, and elastic ankle foot orthoses increased dorsiflexion during swing (by 4-6°, group i). Physical comfort with dorsal ankle foot orthoses was lower than that with circular ankle foot orthoses (groups i and iii). Dorsal ankle foot orthoses increased push-off moment (by 0.2-0.5 Nm/kg), increased walking efficiency, and decreased ankle range of motion (by 12-30°, groups ii and iii).
INTERPRETATION: People with dorsiflexor paresis benefit more from circular and elastic ankle foot orthoses while people with plantar flexor paresis (and dorsiflexor paresis) benefit more from dorsal ankle foot orthoses.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle foot orthosis; Disability and Health; International classification of functioning; Paretic ankle muscles; Systematic Review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26586583     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Interdisciplinary Management of Foot Drop.

Authors:  Anne Elisabeth Carolus; Michael Becker; Jeanne Cuny; Rüdiger Smektala; Kirsten Schmieder; Christopher Brenke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Comparative Study of the Effects of Customized 3D printed insole and Prefabricated Insole on Plantar Pressure and Comfort in Patients with Symptomatic Flatfoot.

Authors:  Rui Xu; Zhonghan Wang; Zhenxiao Ren; Tingjian Ma; Zhe Jia; Shuyan Fang; Hui Jin
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-05-12

Review 3.  Effects of offloading devices on static and dynamic balance in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Koen Andre Horstink; Lucas Henricus Vincentius van der Woude; Juha Markus Hijmans
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  A model to facilitate implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health into prosthetics and orthotics.

Authors:  Gustav Jarl; Nerrolyn Ramstrand
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Modifying ankle foot orthosis stiffness in patients with calf muscle weakness: gait responses on group and individual level.

Authors:  Niels F J Waterval; Frans Nollet; Jaap Harlaar; Merel-Anne Brehm
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.