| Literature DB >> 26585833 |
Nicolas Jeanne1, Adrien Saliou1, Romain Carcenac1, Caroline Lefebvre1, Martine Dubois1,2, Michelle Cazabat1,2, Florence Nicot1,2, Claire Loiseau2, Stéphanie Raymond1,2,3, Jacques Izopet1,2,3, Pierre Delobel2,3,4.
Abstract
HIV-1 coreceptor usage must be accurately determined before starting CCR5 antagonist-based treatment as the presence of undetected minor CXCR4-using variants can cause subsequent virological failure. Ultra-deep pyrosequencing of HIV-1 V3 env allows to detect low levels of CXCR4-using variants that current genotypic approaches miss. However, the computation of the mass of sequence data and the need to identify true minor variants while excluding artifactual sequences generated during amplification and ultra-deep pyrosequencing is rate-limiting. Arbitrary fixed cut-offs below which minor variants are discarded are currently used but the errors generated during ultra-deep pyrosequencing are sequence-dependant rather than random. We have developed an automated processing of HIV-1 V3 env ultra-deep pyrosequencing data that uses biological filters to discard artifactual or non-functional V3 sequences followed by statistical filters to determine position-specific sensitivity thresholds, rather than arbitrary fixed cut-offs. It allows to retain authentic sequences with point mutations at V3 positions of interest and discard artifactual ones with accurate sensitivity thresholds.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26585833 PMCID: PMC4653658 DOI: 10.1038/srep16944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Quantifying X4 variants in HIV-1 quasispecies by ultra-deep pyrosequencing.
| X4 input (%) | X4 quantification in X4:R5 virus mixtures (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAI:JR-CSF | AFG4:AFG1 | CHS2:CHS11 | |||||||
| 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1.0 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| 5.0 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 7.1 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 5.3 |
| 20.0 | 9.2 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 21.4 | 23.4 | — | 30.0 | 25.2 | — |
| 50.0 | 57.8 | 43.9 | 40.7 | 53.2 | 56.2 | — | 56.2 | 53.1 | — |
| 75.0 | 73.6 | 78.3 | 79.3 | 74.3 | 70.8 | — | 80.6 | 81.6 | — |
| 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | — | 100.0 | 100.0 | — |
*Each virus mixture was assessed in triplicate or duplicate beyond 5%
Figure 1PyroVir flowchart.
Figure 2Error rate of amplification and ultra-deep pyrosequencing at each position of the V3 sequence.
The mean error rate of amplification and pyrosequencing was estimated at each position of V3 by comparing the pyrosequencing reads to the Sanger sequences of 20 clones. The mean error rate is shown with exact Poisson 99% confidence interval at each position of the V3 sequence.
V3 position-specific matrix of sensitivity thresholds.
Determining a single sensitivity threshold necessary and sufficient for predicting CXCR4-usage according to the combined 11/25 and net charge rule.
| case | Criteria of the combined 11/25 and net charge rule for HIV-1 subtype B | retained threshold | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25R and net charge | net charge | ||||||
| 11R or 11K | 25K | 25R and net charge = +5 | 25R and net charge > +5 | net charge = +6 | net charge > +6 | ||
| 1 | x | position 11 | |||||
| 2 | x | position 25 | |||||
| 3 | x | maximum | |||||
| 4 | x | maximum | |||||
| 5 | x | maximum | |||||
| 6 | x | maximum | |||||
| 7 | x | x | minimum | ||||
| 8 | x | x | minimum | ||||
| 9 | x | x | minimum | ||||
| 10 | x | x | minimum | ||||
| 11 | x | x | minimum | ||||
| 12 | x | x | minimum | ||||
| 13 | x | x | minimum | ||||
| 14 | x | x | x | minimum | |||
| 15 | x | x | x | minimum | |||
*The V3 net charge was calculated by subtracting the number of negatively charged amino acids (D and E) from the number of positively charged ones (K and R).
†The most pejorative positions harboring a positively charged residue were eliminated to reach the criterion << 25R and net charge = +5 >>. Alternatively, position 25 can be eliminated to arrive at the criterion << net charge = +6 >> if more favorable.
‡The most pejorative positions harboring a positively charged residue were eliminated to arrive at the criterion << net charge = +6 >>.
§The most pejorative threshold between that of position 25 and those required for a net charge of +5 is used.
¶The most pejorative threshold of the positions harboring a positively charged residue was used.
#The least pejorative threshold between those of positions 11 and 25 is used.
||The least pejorative threshold between that of position 11 and those required for the << 25R and net charge = +5 >> criterion is used.
**The least pejorative threshold between that of position 11 and those required for a net charge of +6 is used.
††The least pejorative threshold between that of position 25 and those required for a net charge of +6 is used.
‡‡The least pejorative threshold between those of positions 11, and 25, and those required for a net charge of +6 is used.
Figure 3Example of PyroVir analysis for predicting HIV-1 quasispecies coreceptor usage.
RNA was extracted from a plasma sample from an HIV-infected subject and submitted to nested RT-PCR amplification of V3 env, ultra-deep pyrosequencing, and PyroVir analysis. Ultra-deep pyrosequencing provided 2,549 analyzable V3 reads, of which 107 were discarded by the biological filter and and 74 by the statistical filter. 2 variants, one accounting for 2.9% and the other for 1% of the quasispecies, were predicted to use CXCR4.