Literature DB >> 26585667

Delayed clamping of the umbilical cord after delivery and implications for public cord blood banking.

David S Allan1,2, Nicholas Scrivens2, Tiffany Lawless1, Karen Mostert1, Lawrence Oppenheimer3, Mark Walker3, Tanya Petraszko1, Heidi Elmoazzen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Public banking of umbilical cord blood units (CBUs) containing higher numbers of cells ensures timely engraftment after transplantation for increasing numbers of patients. Delayed clamping of the umbilical cord after birth may benefit some infants by preventing iron deficiency. Implications of delayed cord clamping for public cord blood banking remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: CBUs collected by Canadian Blood Services at one collection site between November 1, 2014, and March 17, 2015, were analyzed. The delay in cord clamping after birth was timed and classified as "no delay," 20 to 60 seconds, more than 60 seconds, or more than 120 seconds.
RESULTS: Of 367 collections, 100 reported no delay in clamping while clamping was delayed by 20 to 60 seconds (n = 69), more than 60 seconds (n = 98), or more than 120 seconds (n = 100) in the remaining cases. The mean volume and total nucleated cells (TNCs) in units with no delay in clamping were significantly greater than mean volumes for all categories of delayed clamping (Tukey's test, p < 0.05 for each comparison). The proportion of units with more than 1.5 × 10(9) TNCs was significantly reduced when clamping was delayed (p = 5.5 × 10(-8) ). The difference was most marked for cords that were clamped more than 120 seconds after delivery (6.2% compared with 39%).
CONCLUSIONS: Delayed cord clamping greatly diminishes the volume and TNC count of units collected for a public cord blood bank. Creating an inventory of CBUs with high TNC content may take more time than expected.
© 2015 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26585667     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  9 in total

1.  Is it time to re-think a sustainable banking model for the Italian Cord Blood Network?

Authors:  Nicoletta Sacchi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Safety and feasibility of umbilical cord blood collection from preterm neonates after delayed cord clamping for the use of improving preterm complications.

Authors:  Zhuxiao Ren; Fang Xu; Jianlan Wang; Zhicheng Zhong; Wei Wei; Jiying Wen; Qi Wang; Liu Guocheng; Jie Yang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 3.  From cord to caudate: characterizing umbilical cord blood stem cells and their paracrine interactions with the injured brain.

Authors:  Priya F Maillacheruvu; Lauren M Engel; Isaiah T Crum; Devendra K Agrawal; Eric S Peeples
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  Effects of Umbilical Cord Management Strategies on Stem Cell Transfusion, Delivery Room Adaptation, and Cerebral Oxygenation in Term and Late Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Emel Okulu; Sule Haskologlu; Deniz Guloglu; Ezgi Kostekci; Omer Erdeve; Begum Atasay; Acar Koc; Feride Soylemez; Figen Dogu; Aydan Ikinciogullari; Saadet Arsan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation: Challenges and Future Directions.

Authors:  Karen Ballen
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.940

6.  The law and problematic marketing by private umbilical cord blood banks.

Authors:  Blake Murdoch; Alessandro R Marcon; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 7.  Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Yiyu Qian; Xinxin Ying; Peixin Wang; Zhe Lu; Ying Hua
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  Maternity health professionals' perspectives of cord clamp timing, cord blood banking and cord blood donation: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lisa Peberdy; Jeanine Young; Debbie Massey; Lauren Kearney
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Peddling promise? An analysis of private umbilical cord blood banking company websites in Canada.

Authors:  Alessandro R Marcon; Blake Murdoch; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.522

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.