Elena Argento1, Kate Shannon2, Paul Nguyen3, Sabina Dobrer3, Jill Chettiar2, Kathleen N Deering4. 1. Gender & Sexual Health Initiative, BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6. 2. Gender & Sexual Health Initiative, BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5804 Fairview Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3. 3. Gender & Sexual Health Initiative, BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6; Urban Health Research Initiative, BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6. 4. Gender & Sexual Health Initiative, BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5804 Fairview Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3. Electronic address: kdeering@cfenet.ubc.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite high HIV burden among sex workers (SWs) globally, and relatively high prevalence of client condom use, research on potential HIV/STI risk pathways of intimate partnerships is limited. This study investigated partner/dyad-level factors associated with inconsistent condom use among SWs with intimate partners in Vancouver, Canada. METHODS: Baseline data (2010-2013) were drawn from a community-based prospective cohort of women SWs. Multivariable generalized estimating equations logistic regression examined dyad-level factors associated with inconsistent condom use (<100% in last six months) with up to three male intimate partners per SW. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported (AOR[95%CI]). RESULTS: Overall, 369 SWs reported having at least one intimate partner, with 70.1% reporting inconsistent condom use. Median length of partnerships was 1.8 years, with longer duration linked to inconsistent condom use. In multivariable analysis, dyad factors significantly associated with increased odds of inconsistent condom use included: having a cohabiting (5.43[2.53-11.66]) or non-cohabiting intimate partner (2.15[1.11-4.19]) (versus casual partner), providing drugs (3.04[1.47-6.30]) or financial support to an intimate partner (2.46[1.05-5.74]), physical intimate partner violence (2.20[1.17-4.12]), and an intimate partner providing physical safety (2.08[1.11-3.91]); non-injection drug use was associated with a 68% reduced odds (0.32[0.17-0.60]). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the complex role of dyad-level factors in shaping sexual and drug-related HIV/STI risk pathways for SWs from intimate partners. Couple and gender-focused interventions efforts are needed to reduce HIV/STI risks to SWs through intimate partnerships. This research supports further calls for integrated violence and HIV prevention within broader sexual/reproductive health efforts for SWs.
BACKGROUND: Despite high HIV burden among sex workers (SWs) globally, and relatively high prevalence of client condom use, research on potential HIV/STI risk pathways of intimate partnerships is limited. This study investigated partner/dyad-level factors associated with inconsistent condom use among SWs with intimate partners in Vancouver, Canada. METHODS: Baseline data (2010-2013) were drawn from a community-based prospective cohort of women SWs. Multivariable generalized estimating equations logistic regression examined dyad-level factors associated with inconsistent condom use (<100% in last six months) with up to three male intimate partners per SW. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported (AOR[95%CI]). RESULTS: Overall, 369 SWs reported having at least one intimate partner, with 70.1% reporting inconsistent condom use. Median length of partnerships was 1.8 years, with longer duration linked to inconsistent condom use. In multivariable analysis, dyad factors significantly associated with increased odds of inconsistent condom use included: having a cohabiting (5.43[2.53-11.66]) or non-cohabiting intimate partner (2.15[1.11-4.19]) (versus casual partner), providing drugs (3.04[1.47-6.30]) or financial support to an intimate partner (2.46[1.05-5.74]), physical intimate partner violence (2.20[1.17-4.12]), and an intimate partner providing physical safety (2.08[1.11-3.91]); non-injection drug use was associated with a 68% reduced odds (0.32[0.17-0.60]). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the complex role of dyad-level factors in shaping sexual and drug-related HIV/STI risk pathways for SWs from intimate partners. Couple and gender-focused interventions efforts are needed to reduce HIV/STI risks to SWs through intimate partnerships. This research supports further calls for integrated violence and HIV prevention within broader sexual/reproductive health efforts for SWs.
Authors: Fátima A Muñoz; Robin A Pollini; María Luisa Zúñiga; Steffanie A Strathdee; Remedios Lozada; Gustavo A Martínez; Ana M Valles-Medina; Nicole Sirotin; Thomas L Patterson Journal: AIDS Educ Prev Date: 2010-10
Authors: Kate Shannon; Steffanie A Strathdee; Shira M Goldenberg; Putu Duff; Peninah Mwangi; Maia Rusakova; Sushena Reza-Paul; Joseph Lau; Kathleen Deering; Michael R Pickles; Marie-Claude Boily Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jennifer L Syvertsen; Angela M Robertson; Lawrence A Palinkas; M Gudelia Rangel; Gustavo Martinez; Steffanie A Strathdee Journal: Cult Health Sex Date: 2013-03-11
Authors: Andrea Krüsi; Jill Chettiar; Amelia Ridgway; Janice Abbott; Steffanie A Strathdee; Kate Shannon Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kathleen N Deering; Avni Amin; Jean Shoveller; Ariel Nesbitt; Claudia Garcia-Moreno; Putu Duff; Elena Argento; Kate Shannon Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cecilia Benoit; Eric Roth; Helga Hallgrimsdottir; Mikael Jansson; Elizabeth Ngugi; Kimberly Sharpe Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2013-09-03
Authors: Kate Shannon; Karen Leiter; Nthabiseng Phaladze; Zakhe Hlanze; Alexander C Tsai; Michele Heisler; Vincent Iacopino; Sheri D Weiser Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: María A Pando; Romina S Coloccini; Elena Reynaga; Marcelo Rodriguez Fermepin; Lucia Gallo Vaulet; Tadeusz J Kochel; Silvia M Montano; María M Avila Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elena Argento; Steffanie A Strathdee; Shira Goldenberg; Melissa Braschel; Julio Montaner; Kate Shannon Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 4.492