| Literature DB >> 26585516 |
Lars Helbig1, Thorsten Guehring2, Svenja Rosenberger3, Adriana Ivanova4, Kathrin Kaeppler5, Christian Alexander Fischer6, Arash Moghaddam7, Gerhard Schmidmaier8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The treatment of infection-related delayed bone unions is still very challenging for the orthopedic surgeon. The prevalence of such infection-related types of osteitis is high in complex fractures, particularly in open fractures with extensive soft-tissue damage. The aim of this study was to develop a new animal model for delayed union due to osteitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26585516 PMCID: PMC4653915 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0816-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 2Maximum torque (Nm) of the fractured non-infected group II (n = 10) was significantly higher compared to the fractured infected group I (n = 10) (* p < 0.001, ANOVA). Similarly, statistically significant differences were found between the fractured side of both groups (infected and non-infected groups) and the contralateral side (* p < 0.001, ANOVA). Asterisk indicates significant difference in comparison to the other groups; * p < 0.001; mean+/− standard deviation
Fig. 1Picture of the biomechanical testing machine
Fig. 3a X-rays (lateral and axial) of the right tibia of a Sprague–Dawley rat (infected group) 35 days after fracture and intramedullary stabilization with titanium Kirschner wires. The fracture gap (FG) is still detectable. X-rays of the right tibia clearly depict signs of infection with osteolysis (OL), periosteal new bone formation (NBF) and sequestered bone (SB). b X-rays (lateral and axial) of the right tibia of a Sprague–Dawley rat (non-infected group) 35 days after fracture and intramedullary stabilization with titanium Kirschner wires. The progression of consolidation of fracture (COF) in the non-infected group is clearly recognizable compared to the infected group. No radiographic signs of infection can be observed in animals of the non-infected group
Fig. 4Outcome of the modified x-ray score of Lane and Sandhu 35 days post op. X-ray score of Lane and Sandhu in the non-infected group (n = 10) (median = 4) is significantly higher than in the infected group (n = 10) (median = 1); * p < 0.001
Fig. 5Results of blood analyses 2 weeks post op. A significantly higher leucocyte count is seen in the infected group (n = 10) (11.71 +/− 1.89 × 103 /μl) compared to the non-infected group (n = 10) (6.25 +/− 4.17 × 103 /μl); * p < 0.05; mean+/− standard deviation