C N Frederiks1, S W Lam1, H J Guchelaar2, E Boven3. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: e.boven@vumc.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Taxanes, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are indispensable for treatment of cancer. Development of toxicity frequently necessitates dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy, despite clinical response. OBJECTIVE: Pharmacogenetic studies were reviewed for identification of genetic variants possibly underlying individual susceptibility to adverse events. METHOD: We conducted a systematic search in Pubmed and Embase for pharmacogenetic reports with focus on commonly reported taxane-related gastrointestinal, hematological and neurological toxicities in adult patients with solid tumors. The findings from a total of 51 eligible studies are presented in a comprehensive way. RESULTS: Most frequently investigated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were located in genes encoding proteins affecting pharmacokinetics, such as drug transporters and genes of the cytochrome P450 family. Inconclusive data for risk of toxicity as well as for effects on drug exposure were reported on variants in ABCB1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and, for paclitaxel, CYP2C8. Interest is also dedicated towards genes involved in pharmacodynamics, such as detoxification of reactive oxygen species, DNA repair, neuronal processes and microtubule function. Recent studies include variants in TUBB2A, EPHA5 and EPHA6 for a possible association with neurotoxicity. Variations in methodological approach, sample size, study design, treatment schedule and end-point of toxicity affect consistency of results. CONCLUSION: This review illustrates the complexity to well design pharmacogenetic studies for validation of SNPs that may clarify differences in taxane-induced toxicities among individuals. Novel genes encoding cellular targets of taxanes deserve further analysis by means of robust patient cohorts and definition of objective end-points.
BACKGROUND:Taxanes, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are indispensable for treatment of cancer. Development of toxicity frequently necessitates dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy, despite clinical response. OBJECTIVE: Pharmacogenetic studies were reviewed for identification of genetic variants possibly underlying individual susceptibility to adverse events. METHOD: We conducted a systematic search in Pubmed and Embase for pharmacogenetic reports with focus on commonly reported taxane-related gastrointestinal, hematological and neurological toxicities in adult patients with solid tumors. The findings from a total of 51 eligible studies are presented in a comprehensive way. RESULTS: Most frequently investigated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were located in genes encoding proteins affecting pharmacokinetics, such as drug transporters and genes of the cytochrome P450 family. Inconclusive data for risk of toxicity as well as for effects on drug exposure were reported on variants in ABCB1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and, for paclitaxel, CYP2C8. Interest is also dedicated towards genes involved in pharmacodynamics, such as detoxification of reactive oxygen species, DNA repair, neuronal processes and microtubule function. Recent studies include variants in TUBB2A, EPHA5 and EPHA6 for a possible association with neurotoxicity. Variations in methodological approach, sample size, study design, treatment schedule and end-point of toxicity affect consistency of results. CONCLUSION: This review illustrates the complexity to well design pharmacogenetic studies for validation of SNPs that may clarify differences in taxane-induced toxicities among individuals. Novel genes encoding cellular targets of taxanes deserve further analysis by means of robust patient cohorts and definition of objective end-points.
Authors: Alexandre Chan; Daniel L Hertz; Manuel Morales; Elizabeth J Adams; Sharon Gordon; Chia Jie Tan; Nathan P Staff; Jayesh Kamath; Jeong Oh; Shivani Shinde; Doreen Pon; Niharkia Dixit; James D'Olimpio; Cristina Dumitrescu; Margherita Gobbo; Kord Kober; Samantha Mayo; Linda Pang; Ishwaria Subbiah; Andreas S Beutler; Katherine B Peters; Charles Loprinzi; Maryam B Lustberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Shuiying Hu; Kevin M Huang; Elizabeth J Adams; Charles L Loprinzi; Maryam B Lustberg Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Alberto Guijosa; Ana Freyria; Jose Rodrigo Espinosa-Fernandez; Francisco J Estrada-Mena; Ana Sofía Armenta-Quiroga; Maria Fernanda Ortega-Treviño; Rodrigo Catalán; Bani Antonio-Aguirre; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Andric C Perez-Ortiz Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: Christine H Chung; Michelle A Rudek; Hyunseok Kang; Shanthi Marur; Pritish John; Nancy Tsottles; Sarah Bonerigo; Andy Veasey; Ana Kiess; Harry Quon; Anthony Cmelak; Barbara A Murphy; Jill Gilbert Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Joann Lagman; Paula Sayegh; Christina S Lee; Sarah M Sulon; Alec Z Jacinto; Vanessa Sok; Natalie Peng; Deniz Alp; Jeffrey L Benovic; Christopher H So Journal: Mol Cell Biochem Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 3.842