Literature DB >> 26584682

Electrical effects of stem cell transplantation for ischaemic cardiomyopathy: friend or foe?

Seth Mount1, Darryl R Davis1.   

Abstract

Despite advances in other realms of cardiac care, the mortality attributable to ischaemic cardiomyopathy has only marginally decreased over the last 10 years. These findings highlight the growing realization that current pharmacological and device therapies rarely reverse disease progression and rationalize a focus on novel means to reverse, repair and re-vascularize damaged hearts. As such, multiple candidate cell types have been used to regenerate damaged hearts either directly (through differentiation to form new tissue) or indirectly (via paracrine effects). Emerging literature suggests that robust engraftment of electrophysiolgically heterogeneous tissue from transplanted cells comes at the cost of a high incidence of ventricular arrhythmias. Similar electrophysiological studies of haematological stem cells raised early concerns that transplant of depolarized, inexcitable cells that also induce paracrine-mediated electrophysiological remodelling may be pro-arrhythmic. However, meta-analyses suggest that patients receiving haematological stem cells paradoxically may experience a decrease in ventricular arrhythmias, an observation potentially related to the extremely poor long-term survival of injected cells. Finally, early clinical and preclinical data from technologies capable of differentiating to a mature cardiomyocyte phenotype (such as cardiac-derived stem cells) suggests that these cells are not pro-arrhythmic although they too lack robust long-term engraftment. These results highlight the growing understanding that as next generation cell therapies are developed, emphasis should also be placed on understanding possible anti-arrhythmic contributions of transplanted cells while vigilance is needed to predict and treat the inadvertent effects of regenerative cell therapies on the electrophysiological stability of the ischaemic cardiomyopathic heart.
© 2015 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2015 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26584682      PMCID: PMC4850201          DOI: 10.1113/JP270540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  98 in total

1.  Intracoronary bone marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: eighteen months' follow-up data from the randomized, controlled BOOST (BOne marrOw transfer to enhance ST-elevation infarct regeneration) trial.

Authors:  Gerd P Meyer; Kai C Wollert; Joachim Lotz; Jan Steffens; Peter Lippolt; Stephanie Fichtner; Hartmut Hecker; Arnd Schaefer; Lubomir Arseniev; Bernd Hertenstein; Arnold Ganser; Helmut Drexler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Slow ventricular conduction in mice heterozygous for a connexin43 null mutation.

Authors:  P A Guerrero; R B Schuessler; L M Davis; E C Beyer; C M Johnson; K A Yamada; J E Saffitz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Human pluripotent stem cells: Prospects and challenges as a source of cardiomyocytes for in vitro modeling and cell-based cardiac repair.

Authors:  Matthew E Hartman; Dao-Fu Dai; Michael A Laflamme
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 4.  Modification of mesenchymal stem cells for cardiac regeneration.

Authors:  Heesang Song; Byeong-Wook Song; Min-Ji Cha; In-Geol Choi; Ki-Chul Hwang
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.388

5.  Mechanism of spontaneous excitability in human embryonic stem cell derived cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Jonathan Satin; Izhak Kehat; Oren Caspi; Irit Huber; Gil Arbel; Ilanit Itzhaki; Janos Magyar; Elizabeth A Schroder; Ido Perlman; Lior Gepstein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Upstream stimulation versus downstream stimulation: arrhythmogenesis based on repolarization dispersion in the human heart.

Authors:  Frank Bode; Pamela Karasik; Hugo A Katus; Michael R Franz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Intracoronary infusion of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells abrogates adverse left ventricular remodelling post-acute myocardial infarction: insights from the reinfusion of enriched progenitor cells and infarct remodelling in acute myocardial infarction (REPAIR-AMI) trial.

Authors:  Volker Schächinger; Birgit Assmus; Sandra Erbs; Albrecht Elsässer; Werner Haberbosch; Rainer Hambrecht; Jiangtao Yu; Roberto Corti; Detlef G Mathey; Christian W Hamm; Torsten Tonn; Stefanie Dimmeler; Andreas M Zeiher
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 15.534

8.  The Myoblast Autologous Grafting in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (MAGIC) trial: first randomized placebo-controlled study of myoblast transplantation.

Authors:  Philippe Menasché; Ottavio Alfieri; Stefan Janssens; William McKenna; Hermann Reichenspurner; Ludovic Trinquart; Jean-Thomas Vilquin; Jean-Pierre Marolleau; Barbara Seymour; Jérôme Larghero; Stephen Lake; Gilles Chatellier; Scott Solomon; Michel Desnos; Albert A Hagège
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts.

Authors:  Michael A Laflamme; Kent Y Chen; Anna V Naumova; Veronica Muskheli; James A Fugate; Sarah K Dupras; Hans Reinecke; Chunhui Xu; Mohammad Hassanipour; Shailaja Police; Chris O'Sullivan; Lila Collins; Yinhong Chen; Elina Minami; Edward A Gill; Shuichi Ueno; Chun Yuan; Joseph Gold; Charles E Murry
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-26       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Haematopoietic stem cells do not transdifferentiate into cardiac myocytes in myocardial infarcts.

Authors:  Charles E Murry; Mark H Soonpaa; Hans Reinecke; Hidehiro Nakajima; Hisako O Nakajima; Michael Rubart; Kishore B S Pasumarthi; Jitka Ismail Virag; Stephen H Bartelmez; Veronica Poppa; Gillian Bradford; Joshua D Dowell; David A Williams; Loren J Field
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  George Ralph Mines (1886-1914): the dawn of cardiac nonlinear dynamics.

Authors:  Michael R Guevara; Alvin Shrier; John Orlowski; Leon Glass
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  State-of-play for cellular therapies in cardiac repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Ramana Vaka; Darryl R Davis
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.845

3.  Physiologic expansion of human heart-derived cells enhances therapeutic repair of injured myocardium.

Authors:  Seth Mount; Pushpinder Kanda; Sandrine Parent; Saad Khan; Connor Michie; Liliana Davila; Vincent Chan; Ross A Davies; Haissam Haddad; David Courtman; Duncan J Stewart; Darryl R Davis
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.832

4.  Biologically active constituents of the secretome of human W8B2+ cardiac stem cells.

Authors:  Shuai Nie; Xin Wang; Priyadharshini Sivakumaran; Mark M W Chong; Xin Liu; Tara Karnezis; Nadeeka Bandara; Kaloyan Takov; Cameron J Nowell; Stephen Wilcox; Mitch Shambrook; Andrew F Hill; Nicole C Harris; Andrew E Newcomb; Padraig Strappe; Ramin Shayan; Damián Hernández; Jordan Clarke; Eric Hanssen; Sean M Davidson; Gregory J Dusting; Alice Pébay; Joshua W K Ho; Nicholas Williamson; Shiang Y Lim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.