Literature DB >> 26583912

Developing Asymmetry at Mammography: Correlation with US and MR Imaging and Histopathologic Findings.

Allyson L Chesebro1, Nicole S Winkler1, Robyn L Birdwell1, Catherine S Giess1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate ultrasonographic (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings, histopathologic etiologies, and outcomes for developing asymmetry at mammography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved, informed consent-waived, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective review of a mammography database for records from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2012, 2354 consecutive diagnostic mammograms classified as showing focal asymmetry were identified. After patients with benign results, those considered stable, and those without prior mammograms were excluded, images from 521 studies were reviewed and 202 developing lesions were identified in 201 women. Patient demographics, US and MR imaging findings, and clinical and histopathologic outcomes were obtained from the electronic medical records. Equivocal US correlates of findings with developing asymmetry detected at mammography were excluded from statistical analysis. The Fisher exact test and Student t test analysis were performed and relative risk and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined.
RESULTS: Biopsy was performed in 73 (36%) of 201 patients with developing asymmetries, with 42 (58%) benign and 31 (42%) malignant results. Of 128 patients with nonbiopsied lesions, 110 (86%) were stable at 24 months (considered benign), 12 (9.4%) were stable at less than 24 months, and six (4.7%) were lost to follow-up. Diagnostic US was performed in 186 (93%) of 201 patients, 74 (40%) with correlates. US was performed in 30 (97%) of 31 patients with malignant developing asymmetries, 17 (57%) with correlates, and in 140 (92%) of 152 patients with benign lesions, 51 (36%) with correlates (risk ratio, 1.92; 95% CI: 1.001, 3.695; two-tailed P = .064, one-tailed P = .038). MR imaging was performed in 66 (33%) of 201 patients, 26 (39%) with correlates. MR imaging was performed in 10 (32%) of 31 patients with malignant developing asymmetries, all with correlates, and 53 (35%) of 152 patients with benign lesions, 15 (28%) with correlates (P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Developing asymmetries were malignant in 15% (95% CI: 11%, 21.1%) of patients. Presence of a US or MR imaging correlate was predictive of malignancy. (©) RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26583912     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  2 in total

1.  Positive Predictive Value for the Malignancy of Mammographic Abnormalities Based on the Presence of an Ultrasound Correlate.

Authors:  Taghreed Alshafeiy; James Patrie; Mohammad Al-Shatouri
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Full-Field Digital Mammography in the Diagnostic Setting: Additional Value and Cancer Detectability.

Authors:  Mirinae Seo; Jung Min Chang; Sun Ah Kim; Won Hwa Kim; Ji He Lim; Su Hyun Lee; Min Sun Bae; Hye Ryoung Koo; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.588

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.