Literature DB >> 26583763

Urologic-Induced Complications of Prophylactic Ureteral Localization Stent Placement for Colorectal Surgery Cases.

Ram A Pathak1, Abby S Taylor1, Scott Alford1, Gregory A Broderick1, Todd C Igel1, Steven P Petrou1, Michael J Wehle1, Paul R Young1, David D Thiel1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prophylactic ureteral localization stent (PULSe) placed by urologists aids in intraoperative localization and detection of suspected ureteral injury during complex colorectal surgery (CRS) cases. We evaluated the incidence and management of urologic-induced complications secondary to PULSe placement during CRS cases at a single center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent cystoscopy and PULSe placement at the time of CRS over a 12-month period. Bilateral 5 French ×70-cm TigerTail® (Bard Medical Division, Covington, GA) PULSe devices were placed without assistance of routine fluoroscopy.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (mean age, 58.1 years; range, 17-88 years) underwent bilateral PULSe placement, with a male:female ratio of 44:55 and a mean body mass index of 26.8 (17.0-38.6) kg/m(2). Mean pre- and postprocedural creatinine levels were 0.91 and 1.01 mg/dL, respectively. Twenty-two of 99 (22%) cases utilized a guidewire to aid in placement of PULSe. Four Clavien grade IIIb complications occurred: mucosal edema, reflex anuria, ureteral perforation, and ureteral obstruction secondary to significant clot burden. Three of the grade IIIb complications were managed endoscopically with double-J stent placement. The ureteral perforation case required percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement. Subgroup analysis of the four grade IIIb complications revealed a mean age of 62.3 years, body mass index of 26.98 kg/m(2), and pre- and postprocedural creatinine levels of 0.95 and 4.83 mg/dL, respectively. Only one of the four grade IIIb complications utilized a guidewire prior to PULSe placement.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of Clavien grade III urologic-induced complications during PULSe placement is approximately 2% (4/188). Mandatory adoption of fluoroscopy and guidewires may be required to minimize complications of PULSe placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26583763     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  9 in total

Review 1.  The sentinel stent? A systematic review of the role of prophylactic ureteric stenting prior to colorectal resections.

Authors:  Stefanie M Croghan; Alexandra Zaborowski; Helen M Mohan; David Mulvin; Barry B McGuire; Michael Murphy; David J Galvin; Gerry Lennon; David Quinlan; Des C Winter
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Urological Injuries during Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Marco Ferrara; Brian R Kann
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-04-02

3.  Safety and Clinical Value of Prophylactic Ureteral Stenting Before Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Authors:  David N Hanna; Andrew Hermina; Emma Bradley; Muhammad O Ghani; Alexander Mina; Christina E Bailey; Kamran Idrees; Deepa Magge
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 1.002

4.  Association of intraoperative gross hematuria with acute kidney injury after cytoreductive surgery.

Authors:  Yumi Mitani; Yohei Arai; Yoshimasa Gohda; Hideaki Yano; Isao Kondo; Emi Sakamoto; Daisuke Katagiri; Fumihiko Hinoshita
Journal:  Pleura Peritoneum       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Routine prophylactic ureteral stenting before cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Safety and usefulness from a single-center experience.

Authors:  Paola Fugazzola; Federico Coccolini; Matteo Tomasoni; Enrico Cicuttin; Maria Grazia Sibilla; Francesca Gubbiotti; Andrea Lippi; Mario Improta; Giulia Montori; Marco Ceresoli; Michele Pisano; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-09-01

6.  Ureteral stents increase risk of postoperative acute kidney injury following colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Taryn E Hassinger; J Hunter Mehaffey; Matthew G Mullen; Alex D Michaels; Nathan R Elwood; Shoshana T Levi; Traci L Hedrick; Charles M Friel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Complicated Diverticular Disease.

Authors:  Kathleen M Coakley; Bradley R Davis; Kevin R Kasten
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-10-21

8.  Prophylactic Ureteral Catheter Placement Appears to Reduce Intraoperative Ureteric Injury During Resection of Primary Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma.

Authors:  Xiaobing Chen; Jun Chen; Ferdinando Carlo Maria Cananzi; Wenjie Li; Vittorio Quagliuolo; Chenghua Luo; Yinmo Yang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

9.  How robotics is changing and will change the field of colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Crystal Koerner; Seth Alan Rosen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-10-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.