Literature DB >> 26583675

Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis.

Yann Parc1, Jeanne Reboul-Marty, Jeremie H Lefevre, Conor Shields, Najim Chafai, Emmanuel Tiret.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess mortality after restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and determine the influencing factors with a specific focus on institutional caseload and surgical approach in France.
BACKGROUND: RPC is an uncommonly performed and demanding procedure; case volume may exert a significant influence on outcome.
METHODS: Data of all patients who underwent RPC in France between 2009 and 2012, including demographics, diagnosis, procedures, mode of admission, discharge, and hospital type were collected.
RESULTS: One thousand one hundred sixty-six RPCs were performed in 237 centers (mean: 1.65 procedure/year/center). Rate of laparoscopic procedures was 47.1% (n = 549). Mortality reached 1.5% (n = 17). Independent factors for mortality were ageless than 45 years (odds ratio, OR = 3.9) and surgery in a center performing less than 3 RPC per year (OR = 3.2). Centers performing less than 3 RPC per year represented 89% of all centers, accounted for 37% (n = 431) of all patients and represented 70.6% of all deaths (n = 12). Underlying pathology exerted a significant effect on mortality; mortality rate after "classical" indications (polyposis and inflammatory bowel disease) was 0.7% (8/1078) and was 16.7% (9/54) for "nonclassical" indications (peritonitis, carcinomatosis, and so on) (P < 0.0001). Nonclassical diagnoses were observed more frequently in centers performing less than 3 RPC per year [40/412 (7.3%) vs 24/720 (3.3%), P = 0.0027]. A laparoscopic approach was associated with a low mortality rate on univariate analysis (0.7% vs 1.2%, P = 0.05), a shorter hospital stay (15.8 ± 0.6 vs 17.8 ± 0.55, P = 0.0053) and more frequently performed in experienced centers ≥3 RPC/year (50.8% vs 40.7%, P = 0.0009).
CONCLUSIONS: Mortality after RPC in centers performing 3 or less RPC per year was significantly higher, and accounted for more than half of all deaths. In France, consolidating all RPCs to higher volume centers may lead to better outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26583675     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  8 in total

Review 1.  [The technique of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J‑pouch : Standards and controversies].

Authors:  J Hardt; P Kienle
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The Incidence and Definition of Crohn's Disease of the Pouch: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Edward L Barnes; Bharati Kochar; Hilary R Jessup; Hans H Herfarth
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.325

3.  Pouch-Related Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Authors:  Edward L Barnes; Hans H Herfarth; Robert S Sandler; Wenli Chen; Elizabeth Jaeger; Van M Nguyen; Amber R Robb; Michael D Kappelman; Christopher F Martin; Millie D Long
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 4.  [Laparoscopic proctocolectomy technique : Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis. Video article].

Authors:  B Jansen-Winkeln; O Lyros; A Lachky; N Teich; I Gockel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Twenty years of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in Beaumont Hospital.

Authors:  Kevin McKevitt; Paul C Ryan; Shaheel M Sahebally; Deborah A McNamara; Joseph Deasy; John P Burke
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Delayed Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis Has a Lower 30-Day Adverse Event Rate: Analysis From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Bharati Kochar; Edward L Barnes; Anne F Peery; Katherine S Cools; Joseph Galanko; Mark Koruda; Hans H Herfarth
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 7.  Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications.

Authors:  Kheng-Seong Ng; Simon Joseph Gonsalves; Peter Michael Sagar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Is diverting loop ileostomy necessary for completion proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis? A multicenter randomized trial of the GETAID Chirurgie group (IDEAL trial): rationale and design (NCT03872271).

Authors:  Laura Beyer-Berjot; Karine Baumstarck; Sandrine Loubière; Eric Vicaut; Stéphane V Berdah; Stéphane Benoist; Jérémie H Lefèvre
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.