Literature DB >> 2658355

Progress and problems in screening for carcinoma of the prostate.

G W Chodak, H W Schoenberg.   

Abstract

Carcinoma of the prostate is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in American men. This is due, in part, to the low percentage of cases that are diagnosed when the tumor is still curable. To improve early detection, routine screening has been performed using one or a combination of tests that included open prostate biopsy, serum acid phosphatase, the digital rectal exam, and transrectal sonography. These studies have been critically reviewed and the problems associated with prostate cancer screening have been discussed. No study has proven that routine screening reduces the mortality from prostate cancer. Furthermore, the positive predictive value and the sensitivity of each of these tests are too low for any of them to be useful for screening at the present time. To determine the value of screening, new studies are needed which should include a control group and an assessment of the disadvantages of screening as well as the potential benefits. Based on published reports, however, routine screening for prostate cancer using any test should be considered investigational at the present time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2658355     DOI: 10.1007/bf01671155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  21 in total

1.  Latent carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  L M FRANKS
Journal:  J Pathol Bacteriol       Date:  1954-10

2.  Evaluation of annual examinations in the detection of cancer. Special reference to cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, prostate, breast, and female generative tract.

Authors:  C B JENSON; D B SHAHON; O H WANGENSTEEN
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1960-12-03       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A survey of 3,000 examinations by transrectal ultrasonotomography.

Authors:  H Watanabe; S Date; H Ohe; M Saitoh; S Tanaka
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.104

4.  Complications of transrectal aspiration biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  P L Esposti; A Elman; H Norlén
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1975

5.  The national survey of prostate cancer in the United States by the American College of Surgeons.

Authors:  G P Murphy; N Natarajan; J E Pontes; R L Schmitz; C R Smart; J D Schmidt; C Mettlin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations.

Authors:  T J Vecchio
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The use of transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis, guided biopsy, staging and screening of prostate cancer.

Authors:  F Lee; P J Littrup; G H Kumasaka; G S Borlaza; R D McLeary
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Screening for carcinoma of the prostate. Rectal examination, and enzymatic and radioimmunologic measurements of serum acid phosphatase compared.

Authors:  P Vihko; M Kontturi; O Lukkarinen; J Ervasti; R Vihko
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Early detection of prostate cancer by routine screening.

Authors:  G W Chodak; H W Schoenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prostatic cancer. XI. Early prostatic cancer diagnosed by arbitrary open perineal biopsy among 300 unselected patients.

Authors:  P B HUDSON; A L FINKLE; J A HOPKINS; E E SPROUL; A P STOUT
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. Current status and prospects].

Authors:  M Zacharias; K V Jenderka; H Heynemann; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Screening for prostate cancer. How can patients give informed consent?

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Cancer risk in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  H O Adami; J McLaughlin; A Ekbom; C Berne; D Silverman; D Hacker; I Persson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Diabetes mellitus and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Bonovas; K Filioussi; A Tsantes
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Current Challenges in Prostate Cancer Management and the Rationale behind Targeted Focal Therapy.

Authors:  Al B Barqawi; Kevin J Krughoff; Khadijah Eid
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.