Literature DB >> 26583458

Staff lens doses in interventional urology. A comparison with interventional radiology, cardiology and vascular surgery values.

E Vano1, J M Fernandez, L E Resel, J Moreno, R M Sanchez.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to evaluate radiation doses to the lens of urologists during interventional procedures and to compare them with values measured during interventional radiology, cardiology and vascular surgery. The measurements were carried out in a surgical theatre using a mobile C-arm system and electronic occupational dosimeters (worn over the lead apron). Patient and staff dose measurements were collected in a sample of 34 urology interventions (nephrolithotomies). The same dosimetry system was used in other medical specialties for comparison purposes. Median and 3rd quartile values for urology procedures were: patient doses 30 and 40 Gy cm(2); personal dose equivalent Hp(10) over the apron (μSv/procedure): 393 and 848 (for urologists); 21 and 39 (for nurses). Median values of over apron dose per procedure for urologists resulted 18.7 times higher than those measured for radiologists and cardiologists working with proper protection (using ceiling suspended screens) in catheterisation laboratories, and 4.2 times higher than the values measured for vascular surgeons at the same hospital. Comparison with passive dosimeters worn near the eyes suggests that dosimeters worn over the apron could be a reasonable conservative estimate for ocular doses for interventional urology. Authors recommend that at least the main surgeon uses protective eyewear during interventional urology procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26583458     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/1/37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  6 in total

Review 1.  The eye of the endourologist: what are the risks? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Marie Audouin; Luca Villa; Maria Rodríguez-Monsalve Herrero; Vincent De Coninck; Etienne Xavier Keller; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Simulator training to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Aric Katz; Avraham Shtub; Amir Solomonica; Adva Poliakov; Ariel Roguin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Evaluation of novel X-ray protective eyewear in reducing the eye dose to interventional radiology physicians.

Authors:  Mime Endo; Yoshihiro Haga; Masahiro Sota; Akiko Tanaka; Kazuki Otomo; Yuuki Murabayashi; Mitsuya Abe; Yuji Kaga; Yohei Inaba; Msatoshi Suzuki; Taiichiro Meguro; Koichi Chida
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Authors:  Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-05-24

5.  Taller staff occupationally exposed to less radiation to the temple in cardiac procedures, but risk higher doses during vascular cases.

Authors:  Kelly S Wilson-Stewart; Davide Fontanarosa; Dan Li; Chris C Drovandi; Rebecca K Anderson; Jamie V Trapp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Assessment of eye doses to staff involved in interventional cardiology procedures in Kuwait.

Authors:  Meshari Alnaaimi; Mousa Alduaij; Faisal Shenawy; Musab Algaily; Talal Mohammedzein; Mohamed Shaaban; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 1.925

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.