Literature DB >> 26583364

MRI of the Musculoskeletal System: Advanced Applications using High and Ultrahigh Field MRI.

Hamza Alizai1, Gregory Chang1, Ravinder R Regatte1.   

Abstract

In vivo MRI has revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal disorders over the past 3 decades. Traditionally performed at 1.5 T, MRI at higher field strengths offers several advantages over lower field strengths including increased signal-to-noise ratio, higher spatial resolution, improved spectral resolution for spectroscopy, improved sensitivity for X-nucleus imaging, and decreased image acquisition times. However, the physics of imaging at higher field strengths also presents technical challenges. These include B0 and B1+ field inhomogeneity, design and construction of dedicated radiofrequency (RF) coils for use at high field, increased chemical shift and susceptibility artifacts, increased RF energy deposition (specific absorption rate), increased metal artifacts, and changes in relaxation times compared with the lower field scanners. These challenges were overcome in optimizing high-field (HF) (3 T) MRI over a decade ago. HF MRI systems have since gained universal acceptance for clinical musculoskeletal imaging and have also been widely utilized for the study of musculoskeletal anatomy and physiology. Recently there has been an increasing interest in exploring musculoskeletal applications of ultrahigh field (UHF) (7 T) systems. However, technical challenges similar to those encountered when moving from 1.5 T to 3 T have to be overcome to optimize 7 T musculoskeletal imaging. In this narrative review, we discuss the many potential opportunities and technical challenges presented by the HF and UHF MRI systems. We highlight recent developments in in vivo imaging of musculoskeletal tissues that benefit most from HF imaging including cartilage, skeletal muscle, and bone. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26583364     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1563735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol        ISSN: 1089-7860            Impact factor:   1.777


  6 in total

1.  Compressed sensing in quantitative determination of GAG concentration in cartilage by microscopic MRI.

Authors:  Nian Wang; Farid Badar; Yang Xia
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Validation of Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography-Derived Thigh Adipose Tissue Subcompartments in Young Girls Using a 3 T MRI Scanner.

Authors:  Robert M Blew; Vinson R Lee; Jennifer W Bea; Megan C Hetherington-Rauth; Jean-Phillipe Galons; Maria I Altbach; Timothy G Lohman; Scott B Going
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 3.  [Diagnostics in osteology].

Authors:  F Jakob; F Genest; L Seefried; E Tsourdi; C Lapa; L C Hofbauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 4.  Quantitative sodium MR imaging: A review of its evolving role in medicine.

Authors:  Keith R Thulborn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Musculoskeletal MR Imaging Applications at Ultra-High (7T) Field Strength.

Authors:  Rajiv G Menon; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.266

6.  Ceramic resonators for targeted clinical magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Alexey Slobozhanyuk; Anna Andreychenko; Alena Shchelokova; Viacheslav Ivanov; Anna Mikhailovskaya; Egor Kretov; Ivan Sushkov; Svetlana Serebryakova; Elizaveta Nenasheva; Irina Melchakova; Pavel Belov
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.