| Literature DB >> 26582602 |
Wenjie Xia1,2, Qiang Chen2,3, Jie Wang1, Qixing Mao1,2, Gaochao Dong1, Run Shi1,2, YanYan Zheng1, Lin Xu1, Feng Jiang1.
Abstract
The molecular mechanism of down-regulated microRNA-145 (miR-145) expression in lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) remains largely unknown. We hypothesized that aberrant hyper-methylation of the CpG sites silenced the expression of miR-145 in LAC. In consideration of its pivotal role in LAC development and progression, we also evaluated the clinical utility of miR-145 as a prognostic marker. We assessed the DNA methylation status of the miR-145 promoter region in 20 pairs of LAC and the matched non-tumor specimens. We subsequently applied our own LAC tissue microarray containing 92 pairs of tumor and non-tumor tissues with long time follow-up records to evaluate whether miR-145 is a potential prognostic marker in LAC. The Sequenom EpiTYPER MassArray analysis showed that miR-145 was down-regulated in human LAC tissues accompanied by increased DNA methylation of its upstream region, which was further validated by the data from TCGA database. Significance was observed between miR-145 expression and clinic-pathologic parameters. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that miR-145 expression level was an independent risk factor for both OS and DFS in LAC patients. Taken together, DNA hyper-methylation in the miR-145 promoter region reduced its expression in LAC and miR-145 expression level might serve as a novel prognostic biomarker.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26582602 PMCID: PMC4652277 DOI: 10.1038/srep16901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Aberrant hyper-methylation of the CpG sites silences the expression of miR-145 in LAC.
(A) Real time-PCR demonstrated expression of miR-145 in three LAC cell lines after treatment with 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine for 3 or 7 days compared with mock-treated cells. Symbol (**) means a significant difference at P < 0.01. (B) Profiling of methylation levels of CpG sites in the miR-145 upstream region was presented as an epigram. (C) Average methylation level of each CpG site in para-tumor tissues and LAC tissues. Symbol (**) means a significant difference at P < 0.01. (D) Correlation analysis between mean methylation levels of the 300-upsteam region and corresponding miR-145 expressions.
Comparison of methylation level between lung adenocarcinoma and adjacent normal tissue in each CpG site.
| CpG sites | Number of pairs | Tissue types | Mean methylation level % (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CpG1 | 20 | para-tumor | 13.55 (12.70–14.45)** |
| lung adenocarcinoma tissue | 19.30 (17.05–21.80)** | ||
| CpG2 | 20 | para-tumor | 27.65 (25.10–30.10)** |
| lung adenocarcinoma tissue | 42.85 (36.65–49.75)** | ||
| CpG3 | 20 | para-tumor | 36.40 (33.70–39.15)** |
| lung adenocarcinoma tissue | 60.20 (53.20–67.80)** | ||
| CpG4 | 20 | para-tumor | 28.40 (25.70–31.25)** |
| lung adenocarcinoma tissue | 42.25 (35.40–49.90)** | ||
| CpG5,6 | 20 | para-tumor | 28.65 (26.95–30.35)** |
| lung adenocarcinoma tissue | 41.50 (37.25–45.80)** | ||
| CpG7 | 20 | para-tumor | 14.40 (13.05–15.80)** |
| lung adenocarcinoma tissue | 27.75 (23.05–33.20)** | ||
| CpG8,9,10 | 20 | para-tumor | 55.50 (53.50–57.70)** |
| lung adenocarcinoma tissue | 76.50 (72.90–79.95)** | ||
| CpG11 | 20 | para-tumor | 48.10 (46.65–49.60)** |
| lung adenocarcinoma tissue | 64.20 (61.60–66.80)** | ||
| CpG12 | 20 | para-tumor | 52.75 (50.10–55.25)** |
| lung adenocarcinoma tissue | 73.35 (68.05–78.65)** | ||
| CpG13 | 20 | para-tumor | 45.80 (43.85–47.85)** |
| lung adenocarcinoma tissue | 58.70 (52.05–65.40)** |
Symbol (**) means a significant difference at P < 0.01.
Figure 2Data from TCGA database validates that miR-145 expression is associated with DNA methylation in human LAC.
(A) Schematic representation of the location of miR-145 in chr5:148810209-148810296. Three CpG sites (cg11671363, cg22941668, cg08537847) included in TCGA database was represented as yellow plaques and analyzed in Fig. 2(B). (B) Expression of miR-145 was plotted against methylation level for three CpG sites (cg11671363, cg22941668, cg08537847). These data were extracted and plotted using a unique tool developed at Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology at National Chiao Tung University (http://MethHC.mbc.nctu.edu.tw). MethHC revealed that expression of miR-145 was negatively correlated with DNA methylation of its 300-upstream region. (C) The gene chip data from Cancer Browser (https://genome-cancer.ucsc.edu/) validated that all of the three CpG sites were hyper-methylated in LAC tissues.
Figure 3Down-regulated expression of miR-145 predicts poor prognosis in LAC patients.
(A) Representative images of ISH staining of miR-145 in different differentiated LAC tissues from TMA. (B) Down-regulation of miR-145 in LAC was associated with clinic-pathological parameters (Pleural invasion, Lymph node metastasis and TNM staging). (C,D) The OS and DFS for the high and low miR-145 expression groups were analyzed by the two-sided long-rank test. (E,F) A multivariate analysis of the HRs showed that the down-regulation of miR-145 was an independent prognostic factor for the OS and DFS rates (by the Cox multivariate proportional hazard regression model). The HRs are presented as the means (95% CI). The variables included in the multivariate analysis were selected using a univariate analysis.
Relationship between miR-145 expression and their clinic-pathologic parameters in 92 of NSCLC patients.
| Variable | Cases (n) | Expression level of miR-145 | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (n, %) | High (n, %) | |||
| Ages | ||||
| < 60 | 51 | 26 (51.0) | 25 (49.0) | 0.834 |
| ≥ 60 | 41 | 20 (48.8) | 21 (51.2) | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 67 | 31 (6.3) | 36 (53.7) | 0.241 |
| Female | 25 | 15 (60.0) | 10 (40.0) | |
| Differentiation | ||||
| Well | 25 | 11 (44.0) | 14 (56.0) | 0.011* |
| Moderate | 20 | 5 (25.0) | 15 (75.0) | |
| Poor | 47 | 30 (63.8) | 17 (36.2) | |
| Tumor ize | ||||
| ≤ 3cm | 34 | 13 (38.2) | 21 (61.8) | 0.084 |
| > 3cm | 58 | 33 (56.9) | 25 (43.1) | |
| Lymph node mtastasis | ||||
| No | 50 | 18 (36.0) | 32 (64.0) | 0.003** |
| Yes | 42 | 28 (66.7) | 14 (33.3) | |
| Pleural invasion | ||||
| No | 67 | 29 (43.3) | 38 (56.7) | 0.035* |
| Yes | 25 | 17 (68) | 8 (32) | |
| TNM staging | ||||
| I | 34 | 11 (32.3) | 23 (67.6) | 0.029* |
| II | 25 | 14 (56.0) | 11 (44.0) | |
| III | 33 | 21 (63.6) | 12 (36.4) | |
*P < 0.05 calculated with Pearson chi2 test.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival in 92 NSCLC patients following surgery.
| Parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P value | HR | 95% CI | P value | |
| Age ( > 60) | 1.982 | 1.183–3.321 | 0.009 | 1.973 | 1.143–3.405 | 0.015 |
| Gender (male) | 1.050 | 0.591–1.865 | 0.867 | — | — | — |
| Tumor diameter ( > 3m) | 1.106 | 0.649–1.886 | 0.712 | — | — | — |
| Pleural invasion (Positive) | 1.602 | 0.933–2.750 | 0.087 | — | — | — |
| Lymph node metastasis (Positive) | 2.290 | 1.365–3.841 | 0.002 | 1.389 | 0.751–2.567 | 0.295 |
| TNM stage (II and III) | 2.364 | 1.412–3.957 | 0.001 | 1.787 | 1.021–3.128 | 0.065 |
| Histologic grade (M-L and L) | 2.595 | 1.470–4.580 | 0.001 | 1.832 | 1.015–3.308 | 0.044 |
| miR-145 level (Low) | 2.128 | 1.255–3.608 | 0.004 | 1.787 | 1.021–3.128 | 0.042 |
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of disease-free survival in 92 NSCLC patients following surgery.
| Parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P value | HR | 95% CI | P value | |
| Age ( > 60) | 1.917 | 1.144–3.213 | 0.014 | 1.863 | 1.076–3.226 | 0.026 |
| Gender (male) | 1.070 | 0.603–1.901 | 0.816 | — | — | — |
| Tumor diameter ( > 3 m) | 1.113 | 0.653–1.897 | 0.695 | — | — | — |
| Pleural invasion (Positive) | 1.631 | 0.950–2.800 | 0.076 | — | — | — |
| Lymph node metastasis (Positive) | 2.402 | 1.430–4.033 | 0.001 | 1.499 | 0.802–2.802 | 0.205 |
| TNM stage (II and III) | 2.286 | 1.367–3.823 | 0.002 | 1.536 | 0.847–2.785 | 0.158 |
| Histologic grade (M-L and L) | 2.499 | 1.415–4.411 | 0.002 | 1.714 | 0.937–3.135 | 0.080 |
| miR-145 level (Low) | 2.182 | 1.286–3.701 | 0.003 | 1.833 | 1.048–3.206 | 0.034 |