| Literature DB >> 26581904 |
Aleksandra Włoch1, Paulina Strugała2, Hanna Pruchnik2, Romuald Żyłka2, Jan Oszmiański3, Halina Kleszczyńska2.
Abstract
Buckwheat is a valuable source of many biologically active compounds and nutrients. It has properties that reduce blood cholesterol levels, and so reduces the risk of atherosclerosis, seals the capillaries, and lowers blood pressure. The aim of the study was to determine quantitative and qualitative characteristics of polyphenols contained in extracts from buckwheat husks and stalks, the biological activity of the extracts, and biophysical effects of their interaction with the erythrocyte membrane, treated as a model of the cell. An analysis of the extract's composition has shown that buckwheat husk and stalk extracts are a rich source of polyphenolic compounds, the stalk extracts showing more compounds than the husk extract. The study allowed to determine the location which incorporated polyphenols occupy in the erythrocyte membrane and changes in the membrane properties caused by them. It was found that the extracts do not induce hemolysis of red blood cells, causing an increase in osmotic resistance of erythrocytes. They affect mainly the hydrophilic region by changing the degree of order of the polar heads of lipids, but do little to change the fluidity of the membrane and its hydration. The results showed also that polyphenolic substances included in the extracts well protect the membranes of red blood cells against oxidation and exhibit anti-inflammatory effect.Entities:
Keywords: Biological activity; Buckwheat extracts; Dichroism; FTIR spectroscopy; Red blood cell membrane; UPLC analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26581904 PMCID: PMC4851706 DOI: 10.1007/s00232-015-9857-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Membr Biol ISSN: 0022-2631 Impact factor: 1.843
Phenolic compounds determined by UPLC-ESI-TOF–MS in an extract of buckwheat husk and stalk
| Compounds | Content husk (mg g−1) | Content stalk (mg g−1) | Rt (min) | [M-H] ( | MS–MS |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caffeic acid hexose | 0.92 | 0.02 | 2.23 | 341.0872 | 251.1121/179.0339 | 323 |
| Procyanidin B3 | 14.14 | 0.56 | 2.78 | 577.1349 | 289.0709 | 280 |
| (+)Catechin glucoside | 3.00 | 0.77 | 3.74 | 451.1245 | 289.0705/245.0814 | 280 |
| Caffeic acid hexose | 5.55 | 1.47 | 3.59 | 341.0872 | 251.1121/179.0339 | 323 |
| (+)Catechin | 4.01 | 0.99 | 4.93 | 289.0712 | 245.0818 | 280 |
| (−)Epicatechin glucoside | 9.10 | 3.43 | 4.03 | 451.1245 | 289.0705/245.0814 | 280 |
| 1-O-Caffeoyl-6-O-alpharhamnopyranosyl-betaglycopyranoside | 16.02 | 1.06 | 4.16 | 487.1450 | 451.1250/179.0345/135.0450 | 314 |
| (−)Epicatechin | 7.73 | 1.06 | 4.93 | 289.0712 | 245.0818 | 280 |
| (Epi)afzelchine(epi)catechin isomer A | 1.16 | 1.45 | 5.18 | 561.1390 | 543.1289/435.1066/425.0865/289.0710/271.0605 | 280 |
| Procyanidin B2-3- | 3.15 | 0.54 | 5.39 | 729.1448 | 577.1359/407.0765/289.0708 | 280 |
| Orientin | 1.83 | 0.29 | 6.40 | 447.0932 | 357.0622/327.0512/297.0396 | 334 |
| Isorientin | 13.00 | 22.44 | 6.47 | 447.0932 | 357.0622/327.0512/297.0396 | 334 |
| (−)Epicatechin gallate | 3.60 | 1.35 | 6.89 | 441.0821 | 289.0709/169.0165 | 280 |
| Rutin | 21.63 | 10.30 | 7.07 | 609.1464 | 300.0269 | 360 |
| Vitexin | 23.82 | 83.08 | 7.28 | 431.0983 | 311.0553/283.0594 | 334 |
| Heperin | 83.20 | 162.01 | 7.28 | 463.0877 | 300.0269/271.0618 | 463 |
| Rutin isomer | 51.86 | 89.14 | 7.38 | 609.1464 | 300.0269 | 360 |
| Isoquercitrin | 49.04 | 93.31 | 7.54 | 463.0877 | 300.0269/271.0618 | 463 |
| Isovitexin | 25.47 | 54.69 | 7.54 | 431.0983 | 311.0553/283.0594 | 334 |
| Epiafzelchineepicatechin- | 9.50 | 14.80 | 7.81 | 727.1658 | 561.1357/289.0710/271.0605 | 280 |
| Luteolin glycoside | 2.53 | 1.03 | 8.37 | 447.1034 | 284.0562 | 348 |
| ProcyanidinB2 dimethyl gallate | 0.37 | 0.35 | 9.26 | 757.1755 | 605.1243/289.0731 | 280 |
| Quercitrin | 13.81 | 1.03 | 9.74 | 447.0930 | 300.0269/179.0264 | 463 |
| Epiafzelchineepicatechin- | 7.47 | 1.96 | 10.00 | 741.1820 | 469.1129/319.0818/271.0603 | 280 |
| Total | 371.91 | 547.13 | ||||
Fig. 1Percentage of hemolysis of cells modified with BH and BS extracts at 0.05 mg ml−1 concentration versus sodium chloride concentration
Fig. 2Effects of BS and BH extracts on the morphology of erythrocytes observed with the electron microscope, at 0.05 mg ml−1 concentration. a Control (unmodified erythrocytes), b modified with BH, and c modified with BS
Mean percentage of erythrocyte shapes formed in the presence of BH and BS extracts applied at 0.1 and 1.0 mg ml−1
| Average percent share of individual forms of erythrocytes ± SD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | BH extract | BS extract | |||
| Shape of erythrocytes | – | 0.1 mg ml−1 | 1 mg ml−1 | 0.1 mg ml−1 | 1 mg ml−1 |
| Spherostomatocytes (−4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stomatocytes II (−3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stomatocytes I (−2) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Discostomatocytes (−1) | 4.90 ± 0.30 | 13.03 ± 0.50 | 0.40 ± 0.21 | 0 | 0 |
| Discocytes (0) | 81.44 ± 0.26 | 72.93 ± 0.31 | 40.00 ± 0.32 | 11.49 ± 0.24 | 12.41 ± 0.41 |
| Discoechinocytes (1) | 13.66 ± 0.19 | 11.78 ± 0.34 | 52.50 ± 0.38 | 24.19 ± 0.39 | 10.52 ± 0.59 |
| Echinocytes (2) | 0 | 2.26 ± 0.36 | 6.74 ± 0.37 | 64.32 ± 0.31 | 56.21 ± 0.44 |
| Spheroechinocytes (3) | 0 | 0 | 0.36 ± 0.19 | 0 | 20.86 ± 0.50 |
| Spherocytes (4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fig. 3Changes of intensity of MC 540 probe for erythrocytes modified with BS and BH extracts
Values of fluorescence anisotropy (A) of DPH probe and values of generalized polarization (GP) of the Laurdan probe for MRBC modified by BS and BH at 37 °C
| Extract | BS | BH | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (mg ml−1) | GP ± SD | A ± SD | GP ± SD | A ± SD |
| Control | 0.426 ± 0.032a | 0.260 ± 0.003a | 0.426 ± 0.032a | 0.260 ± 0.003c |
| 0.01 | 0.393 ± 0.011a | 0.263 ± 0.002a | 0.408 ± 0.008a | 0.267 ± 0.006c |
| 0.025 | 0.358 ± 0.026b | 0.264 ± 0.004a | 0.366 ± 0.028b | 0.265 ± 0.005c |
| 0.05 | 0.323 ± 0.024b | 0.262 ± 0.009a | 0.346 ± 0.034b | 0.276 ± 0.001b |
| 0.075 | 0.297 ± 0.059bc | 0.262 ± 0.002a | 0.323 ± 0.031bc | 0.280 ± 0.009ab |
| 0.1 | 0.225 ± 0.054d | 0.265 ± 0.003a | 0.254 ± 0.034d | 0.284 ± 0.003a |
Statistically significant differences between results of control and modified samples are denoted
Different letters (a–d) within the same column indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 by Duncan’s test
Fig. 4Carbonyl band. The maximum at 1742 cm−1 represents vibration region of C=O groups “free” of water molecules, while the second maximum at 1727 cm−1 comes from C=O groups having hydrogen bonds
Fig. 5Phosphate band I. A shift of phosphate band toward lower frequencies after addition of BH and BS extract is visible, which confirms binding of water molecules
R ATR, S IR, and θ values for MRBC (control) and MRBC with extract mixtures
| Wavenumbers (in cm−1) |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRBC | 2919 | 1.318 | 0.353 | 41.072 |
| MRBC + BH | 1.240 | 0.401 | 39.191 | |
| MRBC + BS | (CH2)as | 1.248 | 0.396 | 39.382 |
| MRBC | 2850 | 1.143 | 0.464 | 36.702 |
| MRBC + BH | 1.065 | 0.518 | 34.547 | |
| MRBC + BS | (CH2)s | 1.088 | 0.501 | 35.215 |
| MRBC | 1730 | 1.115 | −0.241 | 65.465 |
| MRBC + BH | 0.933 | −0.306 | 68.935 | |
| MRBC + BS | C=O | 1.125 | −0.238 | 65.301 |
| MRBC | 1250 | 1.200 | −0.213 | 64.077 |
| MRBC + BH | 1.405 | −0.150 | 61.130 | |
| MRBC + BS | PO2-as | 1.359 | −0.164 | 61.746 |
| MRBC | 970 | 1.250 | −0.197 | 63.310 |
| MRBC + BH | 1.750 | −0.058 | 57.129 | |
| MRBC + BS | N–C ip | 1.500 | −0.123 | 59.932 |
| MRBC | 1650–1657 | 3.841 | 0.288 | 43.546 |
| MRBC + BH | 1.591 | −0.099 | 58.853 | |
| MRBC + BS | α-helix | 1.127 | −0.237 | 65.264 |
| MRBC | 1645 | 2.267 | 0.055 | 52.521 |
| MRBC + BH | 3.167 | 0.204 | 46.755 | |
| MRBC + BS | Random | 1.614 | −0.093 | 58.590 |
| MRBC | 1612–1640 | 1.723 | −0.065 | 57.411 |
| MRBC + BH | 1.523 | −0.117 | 59.654 | |
| MRBC + BS | β-sheet | 1.839 | −0.037 | 56.241 |
| MRBC | 1670–1690 | 1.689 | −0.073 | 57.772 |
| MRBC + BH | 1.125 | −0.238 | 65.301 | |
| MRBC + BS | β-sheet | 1.963 | −0.008 | 55.073 |
Spectra were recorded with 0° or 90° polarized light (T = 23 °C, thick films on a ZnSe-crystal)
Fig. 6Kinetics of erythrocyte membrane oxidation caused by UVC radiation: a in the presence of BS extract; b in the presence of BH extract and by the compound AAPH; c in the presence of BS extract; and d in the presence of BH extract
IC50 values for two oxidation inducers (UVC and AAPH) in the presence of BH and BS extracts and for ascorbic acid (AA)
| IC50 (mg ml−1) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Compound | UVC | AAPH |
| BH | 0.0300 ± 0.0027a | 0.0100 ± 0.0005c |
| BS | 0.0306 ± 0.0031a | 0.0123 ± 0.0007b |
| AA | 0.0166 ± 0.0026b | 0.0201 ± 0.0011da |
Different letters (a–c) within the same column indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 by Duncan’s test
dData presented in our earlier publication: Cyboran et al. 2015
Values of IC50 concentrations for BS, BH, and indomethacin (IND) at which 50 % inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase activity occurs
| Compound | IC50 (mg ml−1) |
|---|---|
| BS | 0.3810 ± 0.0604a |
| BH | 0.2010 ± 0.0432b |
| IND | 0.0076 ± 0.0007c |
Different letters (a–c) within the same column indicate significant differences as p < 0.05 by Duncan’s test