Literature DB >> 26581731

Improving Intelligence Analysis With Decision Science.

Mandeep K Dhami1, David R Mandel2, Barbara A Mellers3, Philip E Tetlock3.   

Abstract

Intelligence analysis plays a vital role in policy decision making. Key functions of intelligence analysis include accurately forecasting significant events, appropriately characterizing the uncertainties inherent in such forecasts, and effectively communicating those probabilistic forecasts to stakeholders. We review decision research on probabilistic forecasting and uncertainty communication, drawing attention to findings that could be used to reform intelligence processes and contribute to more effective intelligence oversight. We recommend that the intelligence community (IC) regularly and quantitatively monitor its forecasting accuracy to better understand how well it is achieving its functions. We also recommend that the IC use decision science to improve these functions (namely, forecasting and communication of intelligence estimates made under conditions of uncertainty). In the case of forecasting, decision research offers suggestions for improvement that involve interventions on data (e.g., transforming forecasts to debias them) and behavior (e.g., via selection, training, and effective team structuring). In the case of uncertainty communication, the literature suggests that current intelligence procedures, which emphasize the use of verbal probabilities, are ineffective. The IC should, therefore, leverage research that points to ways in which verbal probability use may be improved as well as exploring the use of numerical probabilities wherever feasible. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by Defence Research and Development Canada 2015.

Keywords:  decision science; forecasting; intelligence analysis; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26581731     DOI: 10.1177/1745691615598511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  4 in total

1.  Complex Problem Solving: What It Is and What It Is Not.

Authors:  Dietrich Dörner; Joachim Funke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-11

2.  Firms, crowds, and innovation.

Authors:  Teppo Felin; Karim R Lakhani; Michael L Tushman
Journal:  Strateg Organ       Date:  2017-05-09

3.  On measuring agreement with numerically bounded linguistic probability schemes: A re-analysis of data from Wintle, Fraser, Wills, Nicholson, and Fidler (2019).

Authors:  David R Mandel; Daniel Irwin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Decision frameworks for restoration & adaptation investment-Applying lessons from asset-intensive industries to the Great Barrier Reef.

Authors:  Mayuran Sivapalan; Jerome Bowen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.