Literature DB >> 26581421

Intraspecific differences in plant chemotype determine the structure of arthropod food webs.

János Bálint1, Sharon E Zytynska2, Rozália Veronika Salamon3, Mohsen Mehrparvar4, Wolfgang W Weisser2, Oswald J Schmitz5, Klára Benedek6, Adalbert Balog7.   

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly appreciated that the structure and functioning of ecological food webs are controlled by the nature and level of plant chemicals. It is hypothesized that intraspecific variation in plant chemical resistance, in which individuals of a host-plant population exhibit genetic differences in their chemical contents (called 'plant chemotypes'), may be an important determinant of variation in food web structure and functioning. We evaluated this hypothesis using field assessments and plant chemical assays in the tansy plant Tanacetum vulgare L. (Asteraceae). We examined food webs in which chemotypes of tansy plants are the resource for two specialized aphids, their predators and mutualistic ants. The density of the ant-tended aphid Metopeurum fuscoviride was significantly higher on particular chemotypes (borneol) than others. Clear chemotype preferences between predators were also detected. Aphid specialist seven-spotted ladybird beetles (Coccinella septempunctata) were more often found on camphor plants, while significantly higher numbers of the polyphagous nursery web spider (Pisaura mirabilis) were observed on borneol plants. The analysis of plant chemotype effects on the arthropod community clearly demonstrates a range of possible outcomes between plant-aphid-predator networks. The findings help to offer a deeper insight into how one important factor--plant chemical content--influences which species coexist within a food web on a particular host plant and the nature of their trophic linkages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphids Ants; Bottom-up effects; Interactions; Predation; Top-down effects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26581421     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3508-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  21 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Plant genotypic diversity predicts community structure and governs an ecosystem process.

Authors:  Gregory M Crutsinger; Michael D Collins; James A Fordyce; Zachariah Gompert; Chris C Nice; Nathan J Sanders
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Volatile signaling in plant-plant interactions: "talking trees" in the genomics era.

Authors:  Ian T Baldwin; Rayko Halitschke; Anja Paschold; Caroline C von Dahl; Catherine A Preston
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Consequences of variation in plant defense for biodiversity at higher trophic levels.

Authors:  Erik H Poelman; Joop J A van Loon; Marcel Dicke
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  Bottom-up effects of plant genotype on aphids, ants, and predators.

Authors:  Marc T J Johnson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  A study on tansy chemotypes.

Authors:  M Holopainen; R Hiltunen; M von Schantz
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Volatile chemical cues guide host location and host selection by parasitic plants.

Authors:  Justin B Runyon; Mark C Mescher; Consuelo M De Moraes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Chemotypical variation of tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L.) from 40 different locations in Norway.

Authors:  Jens Rohloff; Ruth Mordal; Steinar Dragland
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 5.279

9.  Simulating food web dynamics along a gradient: quantifying human influence.

Authors:  Ferenc Jordán; Nerta Gjata; Shu Mei; Catherine M Yule
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Jasmonic acid-induced volatiles of Brassica oleracea attract parasitoids: effects of time and dose, and comparison with induction by herbivores.

Authors:  Maaike Bruinsma; Maarten A Posthumus; Roland Mumm; Martin J Mueller; Joop J A van Loon; Marcel Dicke
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  5 in total

1.  Contrasting effects of aquatic subsidies on a terrestrial trophic cascade.

Authors:  Nadin Graf; Roman Bucher; Ralf B Schäfer; Martin H Entling
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Effects of intraspecific and intra-individual differences in plant quality on preference and performance of monophagous aphid species.

Authors:  Ruth Jakobs; Caroline Müller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Growth-defense trade-offs shape population genetic composition in an iconic forest tree species.

Authors:  Olivia L Cope; Ken Keefover-Ring; Eric L Kruger; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Chemotypic variation in terpenes emitted from storage pools influences early aphid colonisation on tansy.

Authors:  Mary V Clancy; Sharon E Zytynska; Matthias Senft; Wolfgang W Weisser; Jörg-Peter Schnitzler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Tetranychus evansi spider mite populations suppress tomato defenses to varying degrees.

Authors:  Bram Knegt; Tomas T Meijer; Merijn R Kant; E Toby Kiers; Martijn Egas
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.