Literature DB >> 26581246

An Open-Label, Randomized Phase II Trial of Personalized Peptide Vaccination in Patients with Bladder Cancer that Progressed after Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.

Masanori Noguchi1, Kazumasa Matsumoto2, Hirotsugu Uemura3, Gaku Arai4, Masatoshi Eto5, Seiji Naito6, Chikara Ohyama7, Yasutomo Nasu8, Masatoshi Tanaka9, Fukuko Moriya10, Shigetaka Suekane11, Satoko Matsueda12, Nobukazu Komatsu13, Tetsuro Sasada14, Akira Yamada15, Tatsuyuki Kakuma16, Kyogo Itoh12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prognosis of platinum-based chemotherapy-resistant metastatic urothelial cancer of the bladder remains poor. Personalized selection of the right peptides for each patient could be a novel approach for a cancer vaccine to boost anticancer immunity. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: In this randomized, open-label, phase II study, patients ages ≥18 years with progressive bladder cancer after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) plus best supportive care (BSC) or BSC. PPV treatment used a maximum of four peptides chosen from 31 candidate peptides according to human leukocyte antigen types and peptide-reactive IgG titers, for 12 s.c. injections (8 injections, weekly; 4 injections, bi-weekly). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), immune response, and toxicity.
RESULTS: Eighty patients were randomly assigned to receive either PPV plus BSC (n = 39) or BSC (n = 41). No significant improvement in PFS was noted [HR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4-1.2, P = 0.17]. For the secondary endpoints, PPV plus BSC significantly prolonged OS compared with BSC (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.34-0.99, P = 0.049), with median OS of 7.9 months (95% CI, 3.5-12.0) in the PPV plus BSC and 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.8-6.9) in the BSC. PPV treatment was well tolerated, without serious adverse drug reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: PPV could not prolong PFS, but OS appeared to be improved with low toxicity and immune responses. Further large-scale, randomized trials are needed to confirm these results. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26581246     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  25 in total

1.  A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial of personalized peptide vaccination for recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Narita; Yoshiki Arakawa; Fumiyuki Yamasaki; Ryo Nishikawa; Tomokazu Aoki; Masayuki Kanamori; Motoo Nagane; Toshihiro Kumabe; Yuichi Hirose; Tomotsugu Ichikawa; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Takamitsu Fujimaki; Hisaharu Goto; Hideo Takeshima; Tetsuya Ueba; Hiroshi Abe; Takashi Tamiya; Yukihiko Sonoda; Atsushi Natsume; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Yasuo Sugita; Nobukazu Komatsu; Akira Yamada; Tetsuro Sasada; Satoko Matsueda; Shigeki Shichijo; Kyogo Itoh; Mizuhiko Terasaki
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Artificial human antigen-presenting cells are superior to dendritic cells at inducing cytotoxic T-cell responses.

Authors:  Hua Li; Shengwen Shao; Jianshu Cai; Danielle Burner; Lingeng Lu; Qiuqiang Chen; Boris Minev; Wenxue Ma
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 3.  Precision medicine for urothelial bladder cancer: update on tumour genomics and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Kenneth M Felsenstein; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Mansi Saxena; Sjoerd H van der Burg; Cornelis J M Melief; Nina Bhardwaj
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Emerging role of immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma-Immunobiology/biomarkers.

Authors:  Randy F Sweis; Matthew D Galsky
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 6.  Personalized peptide vaccines and their relation to other therapies in urological cancer.

Authors:  Takahiro Kimura; Shin Egawa; Hirotsugu Uemura
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Immune Responses to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and Their Application for Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Tetsuro Sasada; Koichi Azuma; Junya Ohtake; Yuki Fujimoto
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Personalized Kampo Medicine Facilitated Both Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Response and Clinical Benefits Induced by Personalized Peptide Vaccination for Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Daisuke Muroya; Shigeru Yutani; Shigeki Shichijo; Akira Yamada; Shinjiro Sakamoto; Masayasu Naito; Koji Okuda; Michi Morita; Rin Yamaguchi; Kyogo Itoh
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Feasibility study of personalized peptide vaccination for hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to locoregional therapies.

Authors:  Shigeru Yutani; Takahisa Shirahama; Daisuke Muroya; Satoko Matsueda; Rin Yamaguchi; Michi Morita; Shigeki Shichijo; Akira Yamada; Tetsuro Sasada; Kyogo Itoh
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 6.716

10.  The impact of tumor profiling approaches and genomic data strategies for cancer precision medicine.

Authors:  Andrea Garofalo; Lynette Sholl; Brendan Reardon; Amaro Taylor-Weiner; Ali Amin-Mansour; Diana Miao; David Liu; Nelly Oliver; Laura MacConaill; Matthew Ducar; Vanesa Rojas-Rudilla; Marios Giannakis; Arezou Ghazani; Stacy Gray; Pasi Janne; Judy Garber; Steve Joffe; Neal Lindeman; Nikhil Wagle; Levi A Garraway; Eliezer M Van Allen
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.