Literature DB >> 26581173

Sampling and analyzing alveolar exhaled breath condensate in mechanically ventilated patients: a feasibility study.

Rosanna Vaschetto1, Massimo Corradi, Matteo Goldoni, Laura Cancelliere, Simone Pulvirenti, Ugo Fazzini, Fabio Capuzzi, Federico Longhini, Antonio Mutti, Francesco Della Corte, Paolo Navalesi.   

Abstract

Recent studies in spontaneously breathing subjects indicate the possibility of obtaining the alveolar fraction of exhaled breath condensate (aEBC). In critically ill mechanically ventilated patients, in whom microbial colonization of the upper airways is constant, collection of aEBC could considerably add to the ability of monitoring alveolar inflammation. We designed this study to test the feasibility of collecting aEBC in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients through a dedicated apparatus, i.e. a CO2 valve combined with a condenser placed in the expiratory limb of the ventilator circuit. We also aimed to assess the adequacy of the samples obtained by measuring different markers of oxidative stress and inflammation. We enrolled 40 mechanically ventilated patients, 20 with and 20 without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Measurements of respiratory mechanics, gas exchange and hemodynamics were obtained with a standard ventilator circuit after 30 min of aEBC collection and after inserting the dedicated collecting apparatus. Data showed that intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, peak and plateau pressure, static compliance and airway resistance (Raw) were similar before and after adding the collecting apparatus in both ARDS and controls. Similarly, gas exchange and hemodynamic variables did not change and 30 min collection provided a median aEBC volume of 2.100 and 2.300 ml for ARDS and controls, respectively. aEBC pH showed a trend toward a slight reduction in the ARDS group of patients, as opposed to controls (7.83 (7.62-8.03) versus 7.98 (7.87-8.12), respectively, p  =  0.055)). H2O2 was higher in patients with ARDS, compared to controls (0.09 (0.06-0.12) μM versus 0.03 (0.01-0.09) μM, p  =  0.043), while no difference was found in proteins content, 8-isoprostane, 4-hydroxy-2-nonhenal. In conclusion, we demonstrate, in patients receiving controlled mechanical ventilation, that aEBC collection is feasible without detrimental effects on ventilator functioning, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange. In addition, we show that the sample obtained is appropriate for compounds analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26581173     DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/9/4/047106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breath Res        ISSN: 1752-7155            Impact factor:   3.262


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: how to make the diagnosis more precise.

Authors:  M Isabel García-Laorden; José A Lorente; Carlos Flores; Arthur S Slutsky; Jesús Villar
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-07

2.  Linking physiological parameters to perturbations in the human exposome: Environmental exposures modify blood pressure and lung function via inflammatory cytokine pathway.

Authors:  Matthew A Stiegel; Joachim D Pleil; Jon R Sobus; Tina Stevens; Michael C Madden
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2017-07-11

Review 3.  Evolution of clinical and environmental health applications of exhaled breath research: Review of methods and instrumentation for gas-phase, condensate, and aerosols.

Authors:  M Ariel Geer Wallace; Joachim D Pleil
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.558

4.  Exhaled breath condensate biomarkers in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Michael D Davis; Brett R Winters; Michael C Madden; Joachim D Pleil; Curtis N Sessler; M Ariel Geer Wallace; Cavin K Ward-Caviness; Alison J Montpetit
Journal:  J Breath Res       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.262

5.  Significance of vascular endothelium growth factor testing in exhaled breath condensate of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Jinliang Chen; Xuedong Lv; Haiyan He; Feng Qi; Jianrong Chen
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.285

Review 6.  Electrochemical sensing: A prognostic tool in the fight against COVID-19.

Authors:  Sharda Kotru; Martin Klimuntowski; Hashim Ridha; Zakir Uddin; Ali A Askhar; Gurmit Singh; Matiar M R Howlader
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 14.908

7.  Assessment of ventilator-associated pneumonia by combining 8-isoprostane and nitric oxide levels in exhaled breath condensate with the clinical pulmonary infection score.

Authors:  Zhaoquan Jin; Wenbin Zhang; Minghui Zhu; Juxian Xu; Guohua Deng; Daming Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Is it feasible to collect exhaled breath condensate in COVID-19 patients undergoing noninvasive ventilatory support?

Authors:  Paola Pierucci; Rosanna Vaschetto; Giovanna E Carpagnano
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-05-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.