Literature DB >> 26580740

Characterization and quantification of suspended sediment sources to the Manawatu River, New Zealand.

S S Vale1, I C Fuller2, J N Procter2, L R Basher3, I E Smith4.   

Abstract

Knowledge of sediment movement throughout a catchment environment is essential due to its influence on the character and form of our landscape relating to agricultural productivity and ecological health. Sediment fingerprinting is a well-used tool for evaluating sediment sources within a fluvial catchment but still faces areas of uncertainty for applications to large catchments that have a complex arrangement of sources. Sediment fingerprinting was applied to the Manawatu River Catchment to differentiate 8 geological and geomorphological sources. The source categories were Mudstone, Hill Subsurface, Hill Surface, Channel Bank, Mountain Range, Gravel Terrace, Loess and Limestone. Geochemical analysis was conducted using XRF and LA-ICP-MS. Geochemical concentrations were analysed using Discriminant Function Analysis and sediment un-mixing models. Two mixing models were used in conjunction with GRG non-linear and Evolutionary optimization methods for comparison. Discriminant Function Analysis required 16 variables to correctly classify 92.6% of sediment sources. Geological explanations were achieved for some of the variables selected, although there is a need for mineralogical information to confirm causes for the geochemical signatures. Consistent source estimates were achieved between models with optimization techniques providing globally optimal solutions for sediment quantification. Sediment sources was attributed primarily to Mudstone, ≈38-46%; followed by the Mountain Range, ≈15-18%; Hill Surface, ≈12-16%; Hill Subsurface, ≈9-11%; Loess, ≈9-15%; Gravel Terrace, ≈0-4%; Channel Bank, ≈0-5%; and Limestone, ≈0%. Sediment source apportionment fits with the conceptual understanding of the catchment which has recognized soft sedimentary mudstone to be highly susceptible to erosion. Inference of the processes responsible for sediment generation can be made for processes where there is a clear relationship with the geomorphology, but is problematic for processes which occur within multiple terrains.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geochemistry; New Zealand; Sediment fingerprinting; Suspended sediment

Year:  2015        PMID: 26580740     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Tracing sediment sources in a mountainous forest catchment under road construction in northern Iran: comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches.

Authors:  Kazem Nosrati; Arman Haddadchi; Adrian L Collins; Saeedeh Jalali; Mohammad Reza Zare
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Sediment source fingerprinting: benchmarking recent outputs, remaining challenges and emerging themes.

Authors:  Adrian L Collins; Martin Blackwell; Pascal Boeckx; Charlotte-Anne Chivers; Monica Emelko; Olivier Evrard; Ian Foster; Allen Gellis; Hamid Gholami; Steve Granger; Paul Harris; Arthur J Horowitz; J Patrick Laceby; Nuria Martinez-Carreras; Jean Minella; Lisa Mol; Kazem Nosrati; Simon Pulley; Uldis Silins; Yuri Jacques da Silva; Micheal Stone; Tales Tiecher; Hari Ram Upadhayay; Yusheng Zhang
Journal:  J Soils Sediments       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.308

3.  Fingerprinting the spatial sources of fine-grained sediment deposited in the bed of the Mehran River, southern Iran.

Authors:  Atefe Fatahi; Hamid Gholami; Yahya Esmaeilpour; Aboalhasan Fathabadi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.