Literature DB >> 26580131

Effects of sex and remifentanil dose on rats' acquisition of responding for a remifentanil-conditioned reinforcer.

Jeremiah W Bertz1, Emily L Jackson, Davina R Barron, James H Woods.   

Abstract

Opioid-conditioned reinforcement is thought to exacerbate opioid abuse and dependence. Sex/gender can influence opioid abuse behaviors, but the effects of sex/gender on opioid-conditioned reinforcement, specifically, are unclear. In this study, we compared new-response acquisition with opioid-conditioned reinforcement in male and female rats. First, separate groups received response-independent remifentanil injections (0.0-32.0 μg/kg, intravenous) and presentations of a light-noise stimulus. In the experimental groups, injections and stimulus presentations always co-occurred [paired Pavlovian conditioning (PAV)]; in the control groups, the two occurred independently of each other (random PAV). Next, in the instrumental acquisition (ACQ) sessions, two novel nose-poke manipulanda were introduced. All animals (regardless of sex, dose, and PAV type) could respond in the active nose-poke, which produced the stimulus alone, or in the inactive nose-poke. Both males and females dose-dependently acquired nose-poke responding (active>inactive) after paired PAV, but not after random PAV. Therefore, the stimulus was a conditioned reinforcer. We identified three sex differences. First, only females acquired responding after paired PAV with 32.0 μg/kg remifentanil. Second, using a progressive ratio schedule for ACQ, both sexes acquired responding, but females made significantly more active responses. Third, when a single session of PAV was conducted, only males acquired responding. Thus, rats' sex interacts with pharmacological and environmental factors to determine opioid-conditioned reinforcement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26580131      PMCID: PMC4779734          DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  74 in total

Review 1.  Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward?

Authors:  M T Bardo; R A Bevins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Sex differences in drug abuse.

Authors:  Jill B Becker; Ming Hu
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 8.606

3.  Random-ratio schedules produce greater demand for i.v. drug administration than fixed-ratio schedules in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Carla H Lagorio; Gail Winger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  What's conditioned in conditioned place preference?

Authors:  Joseph P Huston; Maria A de Souza Silva; Bianca Topic; Christian P Müller
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 5.  Drug abstinence: exploring animal models and behavioral treatment strategies.

Authors:  Joshua A Peck; Robert Ranaldi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Comparing levels of cocaine cue reactivity in male and female outpatients.

Authors:  S J Robbins; R N Ehrman; A R Childress; C P O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Opioid-, cannabis- and alcohol-dependent women show more rapid progression to substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Carlos A Hernandez-Avila; Bruce J Rounsaville; Henry R Kranzler
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Acquisition of responding with a remifentanil-associated conditioned reinforcer in the rat.

Authors:  Jeremiah W Bertz; James H Woods
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Lesions of the orbitofrontal but not medial prefrontal cortex disrupt conditioned reinforcement in primates.

Authors:  Andrew Pears; John A Parkinson; Lucy Hopewell; Barry J Everitt; Angela C Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Conditioned reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with self-administered cocaine, heroin or sucrose: implications for the persistence of addictive behaviour.

Authors:  Patricia Di Ciano; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.250

View more
  5 in total

1.  Investigating individual differences in opioid-taking and opioid-seeking behavior in male rats.

Authors:  Stephen E Chang; Lauren D Krueger; Shelly B Flagel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of fentanyl on acute locomotor activity, behavioral sensitization, and contextual reward in female and male rats.

Authors:  Andrew D Gaulden; Nicole Burson; Nareen Sadik; Ishita Ghosh; Sabrina J Khan; Susanne Brummelte; Srinivasu Kallakuri; Shane A Perrine
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.852

3.  Effects of food restriction on the conditioned reinforcing properties of an opioid-associated stimulus.

Authors:  Stephen H Robertson; Emily M Jutkiewicz
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.277

4.  The influence of sex and estrous cyclicity on cocaine and remifentanil demand in rats.

Authors:  Ryan T Lacy; Bridget P Austin; Justin C Strickland
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  Effects of dose on acquisition and persistence of a new response for a remifentanil-associated stimulus.

Authors:  Stephen H Robertson; Emily M Jutkiewicz
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.277

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.