Literature DB >> 26579917

Quantifying Artifacts in Ewald Simulations of Inhomogeneous Systems with a Net Charge.

Jochen S Hub1, Bert L de Groot2, Helmut Grubmüller2, Gerrit Groenhof2,3.   

Abstract

Ewald summation, which has become the de facto standard for computing electrostatic interactions in biomolecular simulations, formally requires that the simulation box is neutral. For non-neutral systems, the Ewald algorithm implicitly introduces a uniform background charge distribution that effectively neutralizes the simulation box. Because a uniform distribution of counter charges typically deviates from the spatial distribution of counterions in real systems, artifacts may arise, in particular in systems with an inhomogeneous dielectric constant. Here, we derive an analytical expression for the effect of using an implicit background charge instead of explicit counterions, on the chemical potential of ions in heterogeneous systems, which (i) provides a quantitative criterium for deciding if the background charge offers an acceptable trade-off between artifacts arising from sampling problems and artifacts arising from the homogeneous background charge distribution, and (ii) can be used to correct this artifact in certain cases. Our model quantifies the artifact in terms of the difference in charge density between the non-neutral system with a uniform neutralizing background charge and the real neutral system with a physically correct distribution of explicit counterions. We show that for inhomogeneous systems, such as proteins and membranes in water, the artifact manifests itself by an overstabilization of ions inside the lower dielectric by tens to even hundreds kilojoules per mole. We have tested the accuracy of our model in molecular dynamics simulations and found that the error in the calculated free energy for moving a test charge from water into hexadecane, at different net charges of the system and different simulation box sizes, is correctly predicted by the model. The calculations further confirm that the incorrect distribution of counter charges in the simulation box is solely responsible for the errors in the PMFs.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26579917     DOI: 10.1021/ct400626b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  38 in total

1.  Structural Behavior of the Peptaibol Harzianin HK VI in a DMPC Bilayer: Insights from MD Simulations.

Authors:  Marina Putzu; Sezgin Kara; Sergii Afonin; Stephan L Grage; Andrea Bordessa; Grégory Chaume; Thierry Brigaud; Anne S Ulrich; Tomáš Kubař
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Improving the efficiency of Monte Carlo simulations of ions using expanded grand canonical ensembles.

Authors:  Harold W Hatch; Steven W Hall; Jeffrey R Errington; Vincent K Shen
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Approaching protein design with multisite λ dynamics: Accurate and scalable mutational folding free energies in T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  Ryan L Hayes; Jonah Z Vilseck; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Effects of system net charge and electrostatic truncation on all-atom constant pH molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Jana K Shen
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Biomolecular Simulations under Realistic Macroscopic Salt Conditions.

Authors:  Gregory A Ross; Ariën S Rustenburg; Patrick B Grinaway; Josh Fass; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Determination of Ionic Hydration Free Energies with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo/Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Explicit Water.

Authors:  Delin Sun; Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju; Sunhwan Jo; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Macromolecular Crystals.

Authors:  David S Cerutti; David A Case
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-16

Review 8.  Computer Simulations of Deep Eutectic Solvents: Challenges, Solutions, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Dmitry Tolmachev; Natalia Lukasheva; Ruslan Ramazanov; Victor Nazarychev; Natalia Borzdun; Igor Volgin; Maria Andreeva; Artyom Glova; Sofia Melnikova; Alexey Dobrovskiy; Steven A Silber; Sergey Larin; Rafael Maglia de Souza; Mauro Carlos Costa Ribeiro; Sergey Lyulin; Mikko Karttunen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Fast bilayer-micelle fusion mediated by hydrophobic dipeptides.

Authors:  Chenyu Wei; Andrew Pohorille
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.699

10.  Constant pH Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics with Stochastic Charge Neutralization.

Authors:  Alexander van Teijlingen; Hamish W A Swanson; King Hang Aaron Lau; Tell Tuttle
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.888

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.