Literature DB >> 26579435

Epigenetic regulation of drug metabolism and transport.

Lai Peng1, Xiaobo Zhong2.   

Abstract

The drug metabolism is a biochemical process on modification of pharmaceutical substances through specialized enzymatic systems. Changes in the expression of drug-metabolizing enzyme genes can affect drug metabolism. Recently, epigenetic regulation of drug-metabolizing enzyme genes has emerged as an important mechanism. Epigenetic regulation refers to heritable factors of genomic modifications that do not involve changes in DNA sequence. Examples of such modifications include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs. This review examines the widespread effect of epigenetic regulations on genes involved in drug metabolism, and also suggests a network perspective of epigenetic regulation. The epigenetic mechanisms have important clinical implications and may provide insights into effective drug development and improve safety of drug therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAR, constitutive androstane receptor; DNA methylation; DNMTs, DNA methyltransferases; Drug metabolism; Epigenetics; H3K27me3, histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation; H3K36me3, histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation; H3K4me1, histone 3 lysine 4 monomethylation; H3K4me2, histone 3 lysine 4 dimethylation; H3K4me3, histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation; H3K9me2, histone 3 lysine 9 dimethylation; H3K9me3, histone 3 lysine 9 trimethylation; HATs, histone acetyltransferases; HDAC, histone deacetylases; Histone modification; Non-coding RNA; P450s, cytochrome P450s; SULTs, sulfotransferases; TSS, transcription start sites; Transporter; UGTs, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases; UTR, untranslated region; lncRNAs, long non-coding RNAs; miRNAs, microRNAs; ncRNAs, non-coding RNAs

Year:  2015        PMID: 26579435      PMCID: PMC4629221          DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2015.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B        ISSN: 2211-3835            Impact factor:   11.413


Introduction

Drug metabolism is the biotransformation process of pharmaceutical substances or xenobiotics, usually conducted by specialized enzymatic systems. Drug metabolism is divided into three phases. Phase-I contains the modification reactions of oxidation, reduction, and hydrolysis. Typical examples of phase-I enzymes include cytochrome P450s (P450s), flavin monooxygenases (FMOs), alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs), aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs), cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (POR), aldo-keto reductase (AKR), quinone oxidoreductase (NQO), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), carboxylesterase (CES), paraoxonase (PON), and epoxide hydrolase (EPHX). Phase-II consists of conjugation reactions usually catalyzed by transferase enzymes, such as UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), sulfotransferases (SULTs), glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), N-acetyltransferases (NATs), thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT), catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT). Phase-III is the uptake and excretion process of drugs and their metabolites through transporters. In a coordinated fashion to transport endogenous and exogenous substances into and out of cells, transporters can be divided into two groups: uptake and efflux transporters. Major drug transporters include solute carrier transporters (SLCs) and ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABCs). The function of enzymes and transporters involved in the three phases determines the duration and intensity of a drug׳s effect. Factors influencing the expression and function of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters are critical to the metabolic process and therapeutic outcome of a drug. It is well known that genetic variations of enzymes and transporters can lead to altered drug response. Many genetic polymorphisms in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters have been identified1, 2, which can be translated into clinical differences. However, the large interindividual variations in drug response can only be partly explained by genetic factors. For most cases, only 10%–30% of phenotype variations can be explained by genetic polymorphisms in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. The genetic information can be differentially expressed in one individual over time and space, and even monozygotic twins do not always show the same phenotype, so epigenetic factors are now considered as an important part of the molecular control for gene expression. In this review, the general concept of epigenetics will be briefly introduced, and its regulation on genes encoding proteins involved in drug metabolism and transport will be overviewed. We will also examine the epigenetic mechanisms as a regulatory network and discuss the implications of epigenetic research on pharmacotherapy.

Property of epigenetics

Epigenetics studies heritable changes in gene expression that are not caused by alterations in DNA sequences. Epigenetic regulation leads to relatively stable changes that are potentially affected by many other factors, such as age, diet, life style, disease and environment. Several mechanisms of epigenetic regulation have been extensively studied, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, each of which can change gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequences.

DNA methylation

DNA methylation usually refers to the addition of a methyl group to the cytosine pyrimidine ring at the 5 position in a CpG dinucleotide context. Status of DNA methylation on a CpG site is maintained by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and demethylases and can be inherited through cell divisions. DNA methylation is necessary for proper gene regulation, chromosomal stability, and parental imprinting. It plays an important role in long-term silencing of transcription and in heterochromatin formation. One way DNA methylation can silence transcription is that it directly alters chromatin structure and prohibits the binding of transcription factors or co-activators to their targeted sites containing this modification, and therefore decreases the gene expression. DNA methylation may also recruit methyl binding proteins (MBPs) that interact with co-repressors and lead to an inactive chromatin status6, 7.

Histone modifications

Histone proteins in the nucleosome, surrounded by 146 bp DNA, play a dominant role in the regulation of gene expression. Several covalent modifications on the N-termini of histone proteins have been discovered, many of which contain distinct regulatory functions and are transmissible through cell divisions. Histone modifications can be divided into those that correlate with activation or repression of gene expression. Histone H3 acetylation is an important epigenetic modification regarding the ability for genes to be transcribed. Acetylation has the most potential to unfold chromatin, because it neutralizes the basic charge of the lysine residual and loosens the interaction between histone and DNA. Acetylation is generally associated with activation of transcription. Several histone acetyltransferases (HATs) have been identified as transcription co-activators. In contrast, histone deacetylation is generally associated with repression of transcription. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) have been identified as transcriptional co-repressors. Methylation of histone by methyltransferases can lead to different effects on gene transcription, depending on which residual is methylated and the level of methylation (mono-, di-, tri-methylation) occurs. By analyzing the chromatin landmark and transcription initiation at most promoters in human ES cells, three classes of genes with various histone methylations have been identified. The majority of actively transcribed genes have H3K4me2/3-modified nucleosomes around the transcription start sites (TSS), and H3K36me3 along the gene-coding regions after TSSs. Certain genes do not have H3K4me2/3-modified nucleosomes around their TSS; some of them are enriched with H3K27me3 along the genes. A ChIP-on-chip study demonstrates that H3K27me3 forms broad local enrichments over silent genes and intergenic regions on gene-rich regions on mouse chromosomes. Vast data have confirmed that H3K4me3 and H3K4me2 are related to initiation of gene transcription, H3K36me3 is correlated to elongation of gene transcription, whereas H3K27me3 is associated with suppression of gene transcription10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18. Although both H3K4me3 and H3K4me2 are associated with activation of transcription initiation, H3K4me3 is enriched more frequently around TSSs of genes, whereas H3K4me2 is found in a broader range of promoters, enhancers, and long-range regulatory elements. H3K4me2 sites also have a higher degree than H3K4me3 to associate with tissue-specific gene regulation. Interestingly, the co-occurrence between histone acetylation of H3K9/H3K14 and methylation of H3K4 is very high for actively transcribed genes13, 19. One of the reasons may be that the complex of general transcription factors is selectively anchored to nucleosomes with methylated H3K4, and binding of general transcription factors to methylated H3K4 is enhanced by coincident H3K9 and H3K14 acetylation. Methylation and demethylation of H3K4, H3K36, and H3K27 serve as a “multistable-switch” model of epigenetic memory to control gene expression in cellular differentiation and development. With a widespread in chromatin, H3K9me2 is frequently associated with DNA methylation and is both a repressive mark in euchromatin and a hallmark of heterochromatin22, 23, 24. H3K9me2 associated genes are enriched in many tightly-controlled signaling and cell-type specific pathways. Approximately 46% of mouse genome is covered by H3K9me2 in adult liver, and large H3K9me2-modified DNA regions are associated with tissue-specific gene silencing in differentiated tissues. There is little overlap between H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 in mouse liver, indicating a unique and essential role of H3K9me2 in epigenetic control of tissue-specific gene expression. In liver, H3K9me2 mediates gene repression by small heterodimer partner (SHP)27, 28, an orphan nuclear receptor that inhibits the transcriptional activities of many nuclear receptors29, 30. H3K4me2 and H3K9me2 inhibit each other in vitro, and increase and decrease of H3K4me2 and H3K9me2 correlate with up- and down-regulation of genes by ethanol in hepatocytes.

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs)

ncRNAs are functional RNA molecules that are not translated into proteins. More and more researches have focused on the regulatory function of ncRNAs. The best characterized ncRNAs are a group of small ncRNAs, the microRNAs (miRNAs), which regulate the expression of protein-coding genes. Matured miRNAs contain approximately 22 nucleotides, and they can base-pair with complementary sequences usually located in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the targeted mRNA molecules. This interaction either promotes destabilization and degradation of the mRNAs, or leads to decreased translational efficiency to achieve the gene silencing effect of miRNAs. Recent studies have also identified the role of miRNAs in cellular memory and epigenetics. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are generally defined as non-protein coding transcripts with longer than 200 nucleotides. lncRNAs have been discovered to perform regulatory functions in various biological processes, including cell cycle, pluripotency, cell differentiation and development, due to its special property to interact with both DNAs and proteins35, 36. Although conceptually not epigenetic marks, ncRNAs are an integrated part of epigenetic regulation whereby relevant ncRNAs contribute to the final transcriptional outcome of protein-coding genes without genetic alterations.

Epigenetic regulation of genes involved in drug metabolism and transport

Several full lists of drug metabolism and transport genes under epigenetic regulation have been summarized37, 38, 39. This review is not attempting to make a comprehensive coverage on this topic, but rather a personal selection of epigenetic interplay with drug metabolism that is exciting and promising for the future. DNA methylation is perhaps the best known epigenetic process, and up to date approximately 90% of identified epigenetic regulation in drug-metabolizing genes involve DNA methylation. One of the major reasons is that aberrant DNA methylation is a hallmark of cancer. The disease of cancer has been intensively studied, and changes of drug-metabolizing gene expression associated with altered DNA methylation in various tumor cells have been well identified. Examples of drug-metabolizing genes regulated by cancer-related DNA methylations occur in all three phases of drug metabolism, including phase-I enzymes, such as CYP1A1 and CYP7B1, phase-II enzymes, such as SULT1A1 and NAT1, and phase-III transporters, such as ABCC6 and SLC22A3. Some genes display reduced expression and are hypermethylated at promoter regions in different tumor cells, like ALDH1A2 and CYP24. On the other hand, several transporters showed increased expression that correlates promoter hypomethylation in certain tumor cells, like SLC19A1 and ABCG2, leading to drug resistance phenotype of cancers. Besides promoter regions, cancer-related changes in enhancer methylation have been shown to alter the induction of drug-metabolizing genes. For example, enhancer hypermethylation suppresses CYP1A1 dioxin responsiveness in prostate cancer. In addition to cancer, many other situations can lead to altered DNA methylations that regulate drug-metabolizing gene expression. Parkinson׳s disease may be associated with epigenetic modifications, and decreased DNA methylation in the gene region was linked to increased expression of CYP2E1 in the brains of Parkinson׳s disease patients. Differences in life style may affect epigenetics. For instance, tobacco smoking was associated with hypomethylation of CYP1A1 and may be involved in the induction of CYP1A1 in the lung. Differences in diet may also regulate drug-metabolizing genes through DNA methylation. Prenatal famine has been linked to timing- and sex-specific alteration of DNA methylations in ABCA1 gene. Moreover, DNA methylation is implicated in tissue specific gene expression. For example, the promoter CpG methylation status of CYP1A2 was strongly associated with CYP1A2 mRNA expression in different human cell lines and tissues. The CpG-rich region near the UGT1A1 promoter was hypermethylated in the kidney, and UGT1A1 expression was defective in human kidney. The variable level of CYP2E1 RNA in full-term placenta was associated with a DNA methylation pattern distinct from other tissues. Although DNA methylation is the most common epigenetic mechanism of mammalian genome regulation, it is only one component of a broad epigenetic program that includes other modifications of the chromatin. Histone acetylation is an epigenetic modification that shows close crosstalk with DNA methylation. The methyl-CpG domain binding protein MeCP2 and MBD2 were found to be associated with HDAC, and increased histone acetylation by HDAC inhibitor induced global DNA demethylation in human cancer cells. Therefore, DNA methylation controlled drug-metabolizing gene expressions are commonly coupled with changes in histone acetylation. For example, both histone hyperacetylation and DNA hypomethylation contributed to the tissue specific expression of UGT1A1 in the liver and intestine; inhibitor treatment to decrease histone deacetylation and DNA methylation induced CYP1 family RNA expression in MCF-7 and Hela cells; the suppression of CYP27B1 by the ligand-activated vitamin D receptor was mediated through dual epigenetic modifications—DNA methylation and recruitment of histone deacetylase. With the help of histone acetylation modulating molecules, typically histone deacetylase inhibitors, histone acetylation is also demonstrated to be involved in regulation of drug-metabolizing genes in all three phases, examples of which include phase-I CYP3A4, phase-II UGT2B7, and phase-III SLC22A2. Histone methylation is another important epigenetic mechanism in regulation of drug-metabolizing genes. In some cases, histone methylations work in combination with other epigenetic modifications. The repression of CYP24A1 gene expression in human prostate cancer cells was mediated by increased promoter DNA methylation and repressive histone mark H3K9me2, together with decreased histone H3K9ac and H3K4me2 modification. In other cases, histone modifications can work independently to silence gene transcription in the absence of DNA methylation. The knockdown of retinoic acid receptors in embryo carcinoma cell lines led to CYP26A1 repression through increased level of repressive histone mark H3K9 methylation and hypoacetylation of histone H4 without changes in DNA methylation. Histone modifications play a role in drug-metabolizing gene regulation in response to nuclear receptor ligand treatment. The induction of CYP1A1 through aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation involved increased active histone mark of H3K4me3 at the gene promoter and increased histone acetylation at both the promoter and enhancer region. Histone methylation may also function in developmental regulation of drug-metabolizing gene expression. The increases of CYP3A16 expression in neonatal mouse livers and CYP3A11 in adult livers were associated with increase of active histone mark H3K4me2, while the suppression of CYP3A16 expression in adult livers coincided with the decrease of H3K4me2 and increase of inactive mark H3K27me3 around Cyp3a16. Neonatal activation of the nuclear receptor CAR by a CAR-specific ligand (1,4-bis[2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene, TCPOBOP) can result in alteration of H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 levels around the CAR targeted drug-metabolizing genes, Cyp2b10 and Cyp2c37, which further results in an induced expression level of these P450s throughout the life of exposed mice. Different from the above epigenetic mechanisms, miRNAs affect drug-metabolizing gene expression at the post-transcriptional stage rather than transcriptional regulation. Similar to DNA methylations, alterations of miRNAs are common in cancer. And many of them were initially studied in the regulation of key cancer-related pathways, such as cell cycle control and the DNA damage response. The first study that demonstrated miRNAs in regulation of essential genes in physiology and drug metabolism was on miR-27b and CYP1B1 in cancerous tissues, which identified a significant inverse association between the expression levels of miR-27b and CYP1B1 protein. Following this, many other miRNAs were also found in regulating drug-metabolizing genes. The CYP2E1 mRNA and protein levels showed no positive correlation in human liver samples, suggesting post-transcriptional regulation. The miR-378 was reported to potentially recognize the 3′-UTR of CYP2E1 mRNA by in silico analysis, and its level was inversely correlated with the CYP2E1 protein level and translational efficiency of CYP2E1, which provided insight into the unsolved post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism. Another special property of miRNA differing from other cis-regulating epigenetic marks is that it can perform the regulatory function in trans and therefore interact with multiple targets. The human miR-27b not only directly targeted the 3′-UTR of CYP3A4 to down-regulate CYP3A4 level through post-transcriptional mechanism, but also targeted the 3′-UTR of vitamin D receptor, which indirectly control CYP3A4 expression through transcriptional regulation. In addition to the above phase-I genes, miRNAs were also identified in regulation of phase-II enzymes and transporters. For example, the UGT1A gene family was regulated by miR-491-3p, which binds to the shared UGT1A 3′-UTR common to all UGT1A enzymes. And altered miRNA levels showed an inverse correlation with UGT1A mRNA level and enzyme activity both in vitro and in vivo. Transporter ABCG2 protein expression could be affected by multiple miRNAs, including miR-328, -519c, and -520h, probably through accelerated mRNA degradation mechanism. Evidences of epigenetic regulation of expression involving lncRNAs have been discovered in many genes. Some well-known cases include the lncRNA Xist mediated X-chromosome inactivation and Air mediated Igf2r gene imprinting. However, findings about drug-metabolizing gene regulation are quite limited. Transporters Slc22a2 and Slc22a3 are located in the Igf2r gene cluster, and thus are also silenced by Air during imprinting. One example of lncRNA regulating drug-metabolizing gene in human is related to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family member 4 (DHRS4) gene cluster. The lncRNA AS1DHRS4, a natural antisense transcript of the DHRS4 gene, could either recruit DNA methyltransferases to induce DNA methylation or interact with H3K9 and H3K27 methyltransferases to maintain epigenetic silencing in the DHRS4 gene cluster. Most chromatin modifying enzymes do not have the capacity to bind DNA, and lncRNAs usually bridge the gap and precisely target proteins to DNA.

Epigenetic network

Epigenetic mechanism has been universally accepted as a critical factor in gene regulation, and its general role can be applied to almost every genes in the genome, including the field of drug metabolism, as reflected by the numerous examples summarized above. However, most of the current studies have only identified the involvement of certain epigenetic elements in gene regulation, revealing the association of altered epigenetic modifications with changes of gene expression, yet a bigger scenario of how these epigenetic modifications occur is not well understood. The universal role of epigenetic mechanism involved in gene regulation strongly indicates that epigenetics is an executor rather than an initiator in control of gene expression. Epigenetic regulations are not proactive, but responsive. They commonly happen in response to changes of environment, diet, physiological or pathological conditions. The inheritance of epigenetics simply memorizes what has been set up by other cellular mechanisms or pathways. Moreover, the known examples also suggest that there are interactions between different epigenetic modifications, either mutually reinforced or inhibitory. Thus, understanding the cellular regulatory network that depicted the epigenetic modifications would be more rewarding in the study of gene regulation. We have recognized the association of different epigenetic modifications with gene expression, but the triggers for the differential marking of epigenetic modifications throughout the genome is largely unclear. Epigenetic modifications are like the “code” that control gene expression levels, yet from a network view, there must be “pens” that write down the “code” and “writers” that hold the “pens”. For instance, Pozzi et al. demonstrated that retinoic acid (RA) induced epigenetic activation of CYP26A1 required the activity of RARβ2, which was further activated by functional RARα in response to RA. Future researches investigating the coordinated network involving chains of signaling upstream of the epigenetic codes are essential to unveil the mystery of gene regulation. Examining the epigenetic regulation as a network has another important implication. Various epigenetic enzymes have been known to modify the epigenetic signature of genes, such as DNMT, HAT, and HDAC. A number of drugs targeting these enzymes are under development for treatment of certain diseases, because epigenetic changes are involved in disease progression. But most of the epigenetic drugs have strong toxic effects due to lack of specificity. The modifying enzymes modulate epigenetic signatures all over the genome, yet most disease-related epigenetic changes only occur locally. So improved understanding of the epigenetic regulatory network may suggest new drug targets with better specificity and provide novel insight into drug discovery and development. Furthermore, altered drug-metabolizing gene expressions are often linked to drug efficacy and safety issues. The study of epigenetic regulatory pathways in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters may facilitate the understanding of drug-drug interactions and multi-drug resistance in clinical pharmacotherapy.

Clinical significance of epigenetic mechanisms in regulation of drug metabolism

It has been clearly demonstrated that epigenetic mechanisms contribute to the differential expression of drug-metabolizing genes in various situations. One important thing to infer from this is that we should be cautious about the epigenetic property of drugs, which may affect drug-metabolizing gene expression and drug disposition. Certain compounds with epigenetic modulating capacities are helpful in research, such as DNMT inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine to decrease DNA methylation and HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A to increase histone acetylation. Treatment experiments with these compounds have aided in the identification and validation of epigenetic regulation in a large number of drug-metabolizing genes. Yet some clinically used drugs may also have the property to alter epigenetic signatures of drug-metabolizing genes, and lead to unexpected changes in drug metabolism and toxicity. For example, the anticonvulsant and mood-stabilizing drug valproic acid has been discovered as histone deacetylase inhibitor with potent antitumor activity. So potential changes in the expression of drug-metabolizing genes under epigenetic regulation may also need to be taken into consideration when this kind of epigenetic drug is administered.

Conclusions

In summary, epigenetic regulation of drug-metabolizing genes and transporters is a critical factor in control of drug metabolism and transport as schematically illustrated in Fig. 1. Epigenetic mechanism is an important source of interindividual variability in drug metabolism and transport. Combining the current understanding with further studies about the network of epigenetic regulations in drug metabolism may help to improve the safety and effectiveness of drug therapy.
Figure 1

Schematic illustration of epigenetic regulation on drug metabolism and transport. DNA methylation at CpG sites may alter chromatin structure and prohibit the binding of transcription factors (TF) or co-activators (CoA) and therefore decrease the gene expression. DNA methylation may also recruit methyl binding proteins (MBP) that interact with co-repressors (CoR) and lead to decreased gene expression. Histone acetylation has the potential to unfold chromatin and may activate gene expression. Histone methylations can be divided into gene-activating and gene-repressive histone marks. LncRNAs may interact with epigenetic and basic transcription machinery to alter gene transcription. microRNAs can decrease the mRNA stability or inhibit translation through binding with mRNAs. All of these epigenetic factors targeting drug-metabolizing enzyme genes and transporter genes may lead to altered drug metabolism and transport.

  77 in total

1.  Epigenetic silencing of the sulfotransferase 1A1 gene by hypermethylation in breast tissue.

Authors:  Min Sook Kwon; Sun Jung Kim; Su-Young Lee; Jeong Hae Jeong; Eun Sook Lee; Han-Sung Kang
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Selective anchoring of TFIID to nucleosomes by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4.

Authors:  Michiel Vermeulen; Klaas W Mulder; Sergei Denissov; W W M Pim Pijnappel; Frederik M A van Schaik; Radhika A Varier; Marijke P A Baltissen; Henk G Stunnenberg; Matthias Mann; H Th Marc Timmers
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Regulation of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 expression and activity by microRNA 491-3p.

Authors:  Douglas F Dluzen; Dongxiao Sun; Anna C Salzberg; Nate Jones; Ryan T Bushey; Gavin P Robertson; Philip Lazarus
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Heintzman; Rhona K Stuart; Gary Hon; Yutao Fu; Christina W Ching; R David Hawkins; Leah O Barrera; Sara Van Calcar; Chunxu Qu; Keith A Ching; Wei Wang; Zhiping Weng; Roland D Green; Gregory E Crawford; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Long noncoding RNA-mediated anti-apoptotic activity in murine erythroid terminal differentiation.

Authors:  Wenqian Hu; Bingbing Yuan; Johan Flygare; Harvey F Lodish
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Hypermethylation of carcinogen metabolism genes, CYP1A1, CYP2A13 and GSTM1 genes in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  R Sharma; N K Panda; M Khullar
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.511

7.  Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels.

Authors:  Huili Guo; Nicholas T Ingolia; Jonathan S Weissman; David P Bartel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A novel set of DNA methylation markers in urine sediments for sensitive/specific detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jian Yu; Tongyu Zhu; Zhirou Wang; Hongyu Zhang; Ziliang Qian; Huili Xu; Baomei Gao; Wei Wang; Lianping Gu; Jun Meng; Jina Wang; Xu Feng; Yixue Li; Xuebiao Yao; Jingde Zhu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Epigenetics of gene expression in human hepatoma cells: expression profiling the response to inhibition of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation.

Authors:  Luke O Dannenberg; Howard J Edenberg
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Small but sturdy: small RNAs in cellular memory and epigenetics.

Authors:  Evelyn Stuwe; Katalin Fejes Tóth; Alexei A Aravin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  16 in total

1.  Alterations of Histone Modifications Contribute to Pregnane X Receptor-Mediated Induction of CYP3A4 by Rifampicin.

Authors:  Liang Yan; Yiting Wang; Jingyang Liu; Yali Nie; Xiao-Bo Zhong; Quancheng Kan; Lirong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  Integrative approaches for studying the role of noncoding RNAs in influencing drug efficacy and toxicity.

Authors:  Dongying Li; Minjun Chen; Huixiao Hong; Weida Tong; Baitang Ning
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.936

Review 3.  The paradigm of drug resistance in cancer: an epigenetic perspective.

Authors:  Swagata Adhikari; Apoorva Bhattacharya; Santanu Adhikary; Vipin Singh; Shrikanth S Gadad; Siddhartha Roy; Chandrima Das
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.976

4.  N-terminal truncated carboxypeptidase E represses E-cadherin expression in lung cancer by stabilizing the Snail-HDAC complex.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Dawei Meng; Tao Yu; Feng Li; Guirong Zhang; Xin Tian; Nannan Zhao; Guimin Li; Lu Li; Hongyue Wang; Yeqiu Liu; Yiming Meng; Yushu Ma; Zhong Wan; Jimin Bao; Haozhe Piao
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Coordinated Regulation of UGT2B15 Expression by Long Noncoding RNA LINC00574 and hsa-miR-129-5p in HepaRG Cells.

Authors:  Dianke Yu; Jing Chen; Si Chen; Lin Xu; Leihong Wu; Dongying Li; Jiao Luo; Yuan Jin; Yanjie Zhao; Bridgett Knox; William H Tolleson; Xubing Wang; Lei Guo; Weida Tong; Baitang Ning
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.922

6.  Regulation of drug metabolism and toxicity by multiple factors of genetics, epigenetics, lncRNAs, gut microbiota, and diseases: a meeting report of the 21st International Symposium on Microsomes and Drug Oxidations (MDO).

Authors:  Ai-Ming Yu; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg; Nathan J Cherrington; Lauren M Aleksunes; Ulrich M Zanger; Wen Xie; Hyunyoung Jeong; Edward T Morgan; Peter J Turnbaugh; Curtis D Klaassen; Aadra P Bhatt; Matthew R Redinbo; Pengying Hao; David J Waxman; Li Wang; Xiao-Bo Zhong
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 7.  Transporters in the Mammary Gland-Contribution to Presence of Nutrients and Drugs into Milk.

Authors:  Alba M García-Lino; Indira Álvarez-Fernández; Esther Blanco-Paniagua; Gracia Merino; Ana I Álvarez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Epigenomic and Metabolomic Integration Reveals Dynamic Metabolic Regulation in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Alba Loras; Cristina Segovia; José Luis Ruiz-Cerdá
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Downregulated microRNA-23b promotes BMP9-mediated osteogenesis in C2C12 myoblast cells by targeting Runx2.

Authors:  Chu Chen; Zuchuan Tang; Qiling Song; Min Yang; Qiong Shi; Yaguang Weng
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.952

10.  Arenobufagin is a novel isoform-specific probe for sensing human sulfotransferase 2A1.

Authors:  Xiangge Tian; Chao Wang; Peipei Dong; Yue An; Xinyu Zhao; Weiru Jiang; Gang Wang; Jie Hou; Lei Feng; Yan Wang; Guangbo Ge; Xiaokui Huo; Jing Ning; Xiaochi Ma
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 11.413

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.