| Literature DB >> 26579255 |
Khaled Mursi1, Ayman Agag2, Olfat Hammam3, Mahmoud Riad2, Mahmoud Daw1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the immunohistochemical expression of p63 in bladder cancer and the variation of expression in relation to histological type, grade and stage of the tumour, and whether bilharziasis (endemic in Egypt) has an effect on its expression, in an attempt to better understand the tumour behaviour and the possibility of using p63 as a prognostic marker. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, biopsies were taken from the bladders of 70 patients, who were divided into three groups; group A comprised 10 with a normal urothelium, group B comprised 20 with chronic cystitis (bilharzial and non-bilharzial) and group C contained 40 with bladder cancer. The biopsies were examined for the expression of p63, using immunohistochemical techniques.Entities:
Keywords: Bilharziasis; Bladder; CIS, carcinoma in situ; Cancer; Diagnosis; P63; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; TCC, transitional cell carcinoma
Year: 2013 PMID: 26579255 PMCID: PMC4442933 DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.12.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arab J Urol ISSN: 2090-598X
The stages and grades of different malignant lesions in group C.
| Stage or grade | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| TCC | SCC | Total | |
| Total | 25 | 15 | 40 |
| Stage | |||
| Ta | 5 (20) | 0 | 5 (13) |
| T1 | 7 (28) | 0 | 7 (18) |
| T2 | 10 (40) | 7 | 17 (43) |
| T3 | 3 (12) | 8 | 11 (28) |
| I | 8 (32) | 0 | 8 (20) |
| II | 14 (56) | 9 | 23 (58) |
| III | 3 (12) | 6 | 9 (23) |
The effect of a bilharzial association on the tumour stage and grade in group C.
| Category | Non-bilharzial | Bilharzial | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 10 | 30 | 40 |
| Stage | |||
| Superficial | 2 | 10 (33) | 12 (30) |
| Invasive | 8 | 20 (67) | 28 (70) |
| Total | 10 (25) | 30 (75) | 40 (100) |
| I | 1 | 7 (23) | 8 (20) |
| I and II | 9 | 23 (77) | 32 (80) |
| Total | 10 (25) | 30 (75) | 40 (100) |
The expression of p63 in the three groups.
| Category ( | Nuclear p63 immunoreactivity, | Total +ve | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Mild | Negative | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | ||
| (0–10%) | (11–30%) | +Mild | (31–60%) | (61–100%) | +Strong | ||
| Group A (10) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Group B (20) | |||||||
| Non-bilharzial (10) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Bilharzial (10) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3a | 7a | 10 | 10 |
| Total (20) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (15)b | 17 (85)b | 20 (100) | 20 (100) |
| Group C (40) | |||||||
| Non-bilharzial (10) | 3a | 3a | 6l | 2 | 2j | 4l | 7a |
| Bilharzial (30) | 4l | 9k | 13m | 3 | 14 | 17 (57)m | 26 (87)l |
| TCC bilharzial (15) | 1 | 2e | 3cde | 2 | 10cdi | 12cde | 14 |
| SCC (15) | 3 | 7 | 10f | 1 | 4 | 5f | 12 |
| Total | 7fh | 12fh | 19 (48)ab | 5g | 16 (40)fh | 21 (53)ab | 33 (83)fh |
| TCC (25) | 4 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 12 | 16 (64) | 21 (84) |
| Superficial (12) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 11 |
| Invasive (13) | 3 | 4 | 7g | 1 | 5 | 6g | 10 |
| SCC (15) | 3 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 12 |
| Total (40) | 7 | 12 | 19 (48) | 5 | 16 (40) | 21 (53) | 33 (83) |
| Stage (40) | |||||||
| Ta (5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| T1 (7) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| T2 − T3 (28) | 6a | 11c | 17 (61)h | 2 | 9b | 11h | 22 (79)a |
| Grade (40) | |||||||
| I (8) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| II (23) | 3d | 9 | 12i | 3 | 8e | 11i | 20 (87)d |
| III (9) | 4f | 2 | 6i | 1 | 2f | 3i | 5f |
| TCC (25) | 1j | 24 (96)j | |||||
| Urothelial hyperplasia (7/25) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | |||
| Low-grade dysplasia (10/25) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | |||
| High-grade dysplasia (8/25) | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |||
| Total | 0b | 1c | 7a | 17 (68)a | 25 (100)b | ||
| SCC | 0k | 15 (100)k | |||||
| Squamous metaplasia (10/15) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | |||
| Low-grade dysplasia (2/15) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||
| High-grade dysplasia (3/15) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Total | 0e | 0f | 4d | 11df | 15 (100)e | ||
For initial group A–C comparisons: aP = 0.03 vs. chronic non-bilharzial cystitis; bP = 0.04 vs. control; cP = 0.01 vs. non-bilharzial malignant lesion; dP = 0.01 vs. SCC; eP = 0.02 vs. SCC; fP < 0.01 vs. control; gP = 0.01 vs. control; hP < 0.01 vs. cystitis; iP = 0.04 vs. total tumour; jP < 0.01 vs. chronic non-bilharzial cystitis; kP < 0.01 vs. chronic bilharzial cystitis; lP = 0.02 vs. chronic bilharzial cystitis.
For group C section: aP = 0.01 vs. Ta; bP = 0.04 vs. Ta; cP < 0.01 vs. Ta; dP = 0.04 vs. Grade I; eP = 0.03 vs. Grade I; fP = 0.02 vs. Grade I.
For normal adjacent mucosa: aP < 0.01 vs. control; bP = 0.02 vs. total TCC; cP = 0.04 vs. total TCC; dP = 0.02 vs. control; eP = 0.04 vs. SCC; fP < 0.01 vs. SCC.
For combined groups Negative +Mild and Moderate +Strong: aP < 0.01 vs. control; bP < 0.01 vs. chronic cystitis; cP = 0.03 vs. non-bilharzial tumour; dP = 0.02 vs. total tumour; eP < 0.01 vs. SCC; fP = 0.03 vs. TCC; gP = 0.03 vs. superficial TCC; hP < 0.01 vs. Ta; iP = 0.01 vs. Grade I; jP < 0.01 vs. TCC; kP < 0.01 vs. SCC; lP < 0.01 vs. chronic non-bilharzial cystitis; mP < 0.01 vs. chronic bilharzial cystitis.