| Literature DB >> 26578246 |
Yeny Z Castellanos-Domínguez1, Zulma M Cucunubá2,3, Luis C Orozco1, Carlos A Valencia-Hernández2,3, Cielo M León2, Astrid C Florez2, Lyda Muñoz2, Paula Pavía4, Marleny Montilla2, Luz Marina Uribe5, Carlos García5, William Ardila5, Rubén Santiago Nicholls2, Concepción J Puerta4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with Chagas disease in pregnant women in an endemic area of Santander, Colombia.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Trypanosoma cruzizzm321990; Chagas congénito; Chagas disease; Trypanosoma cruzi; congenital Chagas disease; diagnostic sérologique; diagnóstico serológico; embarazo; enfermedad de Chagas; facteurs de risque; factores de riesgo; grossesse; maladie de Chagas; maladie de Chagas congénitale; pregnancy; risk factors; serological diagnosis
Year: 2015 PMID: 26578246 PMCID: PMC4737279 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Int Health ISSN: 1360-2276 Impact factor: 2.622
Figure 1Map of the participant municipalities in the Guanentina, Comunera and García Rovira provinces, Santander, Colombia.
Prevalence of seropositivity in pregnant women in the municipalities of three provinces, Santander, Colombia
| Province/Municipality | Negative | Positive | Total | Proportion (%) of sero[+] | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guanentina Province | |||||
| Curiti | 29 | 1 | 30 | 3.3 | 0.1–17.2 |
| Charalá | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0 | 0.0–23.1 |
| Coromoro | 36 | 2 | 38 | 5.3 | 0.6–17.7 |
| Mogotes | 94 | 21 | 115 | 18.3 | 11.6–26.5 |
| Onzaga | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0 | 0.0–13.7 |
| San Gil | 222 | 4 | 226 | 1.8 | 0.5–4.5 |
| San Joaquín | 47 | 2 | 49 | 4.1 | 0.5–14.0 |
| Subtotal | 467 | 30 | 497 | 6.0 | 4.1–8.5 |
| Comunera Province | |||||
| Gámbita | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0 | 0.0–24.7 |
| Guacamayo | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0 | 0.0–14.8 |
| Socorro | 324 | 5 | 329 | 1.5 | 0.5–3.5 |
| Suaita | 40 | 0 | 40 | 0.0 | 0.0–8.8 |
| Oiba | 138 | 1 | 139 | 0.7 | 0.0–3.9 |
| Hato | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 0.0–60.2 |
| Palmas del Socorro | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0.0–70.8 |
| Simacota | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0 | 0.0–21.8 |
| Subtotal | 560 | 6 | 566 | 1.1 | 0.4–2.3 |
| García Rovira Province | |||||
| Capitanejo | 91 | 4 | 95 | 4.2 | 1.2–10.4 |
| Concepción | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0.0 | 0.0–13.7 |
| Enciso | 6 | 2 | 8 | 25.0 | 3.2–65.1 |
| Macaravita | 35 | 2 | 37 | 5.4 | 0.7–18.2 |
| Molagavita | 51 | 2 | 53 | 3.8 | 0.5–13.0 |
| Málaga | 186 | 1 | 187 | 0.5 | 0.0–2.9 |
| San Jose de Miranda | 40 | 1 | 41 | 2.4 | 0.1–12.9 |
| San Miguel | 8 | 1 | 9 | 11.1 | 0.3–48.2 |
| Subtotal | 442 | 13 | 455 | 2.9 | 1.5–4.8 |
| Total | 1469 | 49 | 1518 | 3.2 | 2.4–4.2 |
Department is the first administrative order. Municipality is second administrative order. Province is an intermediate level between department and municipality.
Bivariate analysis for potential risk factors associated with seropositive pregnant women in Santander, Colombia
| Variable |
| sero[+] | % | OR | 95% CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socio‐demographic factors | ||||||
| Residence area | ||||||
| Urban area | 725 | 13 | 1.79 | 1 | 0.003 | |
| Rural area | 793 | 36 | 4.54 | 2.6 | 1.3–5.4 | |
| Age | ||||||
| 13–19 | 382 | 4 | 1.05 | 1 | ||
| 20–24 | 447 | 13 | 2.91 | 2.8 | 0.9–8.4 | <0.001 |
| 25–29 | 301 | 5 | 1.66 | 1.6 | 0.4–5.9 | |
| 30–42 | 388 | 27 | 6.96 | 6.6 | 2.3–18.8 | |
| Socio‐economic strata | ||||||
| High (3,4,5) | 491 | 9 | 1.83 | 1 | 0.034 | |
| Low (0,1,2) | 1027 | 40 | 3.89 | 2.2 | 1.0–4.5 | |
| Healthcare insurance | ||||||
| Contributive | 151 | 3 | 1.99 | 1 | 0.211 | |
| Non‐insured | 152 | 2 | 1.32 | 1.5 | 0.3–9.1 | |
| Subsidised | 1215 | 44 | 3.62 | 2.8 | 0.7–11.7 | |
| Education level | ||||||
| University | 172 | 2 | 1.16 | 1 | <0.001 | |
| High School | 842 | 9 | 1.07 | 0.9 | 0.2–4.3 | |
| Primary School | 493 | 36 | 7.30 | 6.7 | 1.6–28.1 | |
| None | 11 | 2 | 18.18 | 18.9 | 2.4–149.9 | |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Married | 1183 | 43 | 3.63 | 1 | 0.124 | |
| Single | 321 | 5 | 1.56 | 0.4 | 0.2–1.1 | |
| Widow‐separated | 14 | 1 | 7.14 | 2 | 0.3–15.9 | |
| Occupation | ||||||
| Housewife | 1192 | 46 | 3.86 | 1 | 0.068 | |
| Student | 209 | 2 | 0.96 | 0.2 | 0.6–1.0 | |
| Worker in urban area | 96 | 1 | 1.04 | 0.3 | 0.0–1.9 | |
| Worker in rural area (agriculture) | 21 | 0 | 0.00 | – | – | |
| Factors related with triatomine vectors exposure | ||||||
| Recognition of the vector | ||||||
| No | 809 | 10 | 1.24 | 1 |
| |
| Yes | 656 | 39 | 5.95 | 5.1 | 2.5–10.2 | |
| Close contact with vectors at least once in lifetime | ||||||
| No | 1186 | 21 | 1.77 | 1 |
| |
| Yes | 169 | 25 | 14.79 | 9.6 | 5.3–17.7 | |
| No response | 163 | 3 | 1.84 | 1 | 0.3–3.5 | |
| Close contact with vectors during the last year | ||||||
| No | 1336 | 44 | 3.29 | 1 | 0.283 | |
| Yes | 26 | 2 | 7.69 | 2.4 | 0.6–10.7 | |
| Close contact with animals | ||||||
| No | 462 | 16 | 3.46 | 1 | 0.732 | |
| Yes | 1056 | 33 | 3.13 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.7 | |
| Housing conditions | ||||||
| Current floor | ||||||
| Cement | 1241 | 32 | 2.58 | 1 |
| |
| Wood | 36 | 2 | 5.56 | 2.2 | 0.5–9.7 | |
| Dirt | 190 | 15 | 7.89 | 3.2 | 1.7–6.1 | |
| Other | 51 | 0 | 0.00 | – | – | |
| Current roof | ||||||
| Clay tiles | 601 | 20 | 3.33 | 1 | ||
| Fibrocement tiles | 552 | 18 | 3.26 | 1 | 0.5–1.9 |
|
| Thatched/palm leaves | 12 | 3 | 25.00 | 9.7 | 2.4–38.5 | |
| Other | 353 | 8 | 2.27 | 0.7 | 0.3–1.5 | |
| Current wall | ||||||
| Brick/cement | 1109 | 28 | 2.52 | 1 |
| |
| Wood | 19 | 2 | 10.53 | 4.5 | 1.0–20.6 | |
| Adobe | 371 | 19 | 5.12 | 2.1 | 1.2–3.8 | |
| Other | 19 | 0 | 0.00 | – | – | |
| Floor of housing during childhood | ||||||
| Cement | 796 | 16 | 2.01 | 1 |
| |
| Wood | 68 | 0 | 0.00 | – | – | |
| Dirt | 639 | 33 | 5.16 | 2.7 | 1.5–4.9 | |
| Other | 15 | 0 | 0.00 | – | – | |
| Roof during childhood | ||||||
| Clay tiles | 753 | 22 | 2.92 | 1 |
| |
| Fibrocement tiles | 408 | 8 | 1.96 | 0.7 | 0.3–1.5 | |
| Thatched/palm leaves | 92 | 12 | 13.04 | 5 | 2.4–10.5 | |
| Other | 265 | 7 | 2.64 | 0.9 | 0.4–2.1 | |
| Walls of housing during childhood | ||||||
| Brick/cement | 737 | 12 | 1.63 | 1 |
| |
| Wood | 70 | 2 | 2.86 | 1.8 | 0.4–8.1 | |
| Adobe | 676 | 34 | 5.03 | 3.2 | 1.6–6.2 | |
| Other | 35 | 1 | 2.86 | 1.8 | 0.2–14.1 | |
| Other factors | ||||||
| Relatives diagnosed with Chagas disease | ||||||
| No | 1320 | 39 | 2.95 | 1 |
| |
| Yes | 101 | 9 | 8.91 | 3.2 | 1.5–6.8 | |
| No response | 97 | 1 | 1.03 | 0.3 | 0.1–2.5 | |
| Previous transfusions | ||||||
| No | 1467 | 48 | 3.27 | 1 | 0.578 | |
| Yes | 29 | 0 | 0.00 | – | – | |
Bold numbers mean p values statistically signifciant at <0.05.
Logistic regression model for seropositive pregnant women of Santander
| Variable | OR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Current thatch roof | 11.8 | 2.2–63.2 | 0.004 |
| Close contact with vector at least once on life | 6.9 | 3.7–12.9 | <0.001 |
| Low education level | 4.6 | 2.2–9.5 | <0.001 |
| Thatch roof during childhood | 3.0 | 1.4–6.6 | 0.005 |
| Age >32 years | 2.1 | 1.1–3.9 | 0.024 |