Literature DB >> 26577774

Three-Year Outcomes of Cranial Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: The STAR Trial.

B Tucker Woodson1, Ryan J Soose2, M Boyd Gillespie3, Kingman P Strohl4, Joachim T Maurer5, Nico de Vries6, David L Steward7, Jonathan Z Baskin4, M Safwan Badr8, Ho-sheng Lin8, Tapan A Padhya9, Sam Mickelson10, W McDowell Anderson9, Olivier M Vanderveken11, Patrick J Strollo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the 36-month clinical and polysomnography (PSG) outcomes in an obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) cohort treated with hypoglossal cranial nerve upper airway stimulation (UAS). STUDY
DESIGN: A multicenter prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Industry-supported multicenter academic and clinical setting.
SUBJECTS: Participants (n = 116) at 36 months from a cohort of 126 implanted participants.
METHODS: Participants were enrolled in a prospective phase III trial evaluating the efficacy of UAS for moderated to severe OSA. Prospective outcomes included apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, other PSG measures, self-reported measures of sleepiness, sleep-related quality of life, and snoring.
RESULTS: Of 126 enrolled participants, 116 (92%) completed 36-month follow-up evaluation per protocol; 98 participants additionally agreed to a voluntary 36-month PSG. Self-report daily device usage was 81%. In the PSG group, 74% met the a priori definition of success with the primary outcomes of apnea-hypopnea index, reduced from the median value of 28.2 events per hour at baseline to 8.7 and 6.2 at 12 and 36 months, respectively. Similarly, self-reported outcomes improved from baseline to 12 months and were maintained at 36 months. Soft or no snoring reported by bed partner increased from 17% at baseline to 80% at 36 months. Serious device-related adverse events were rare, with 1 elective device explantation from 12 to 36 months.
CONCLUSION: Long-term 3-year improvements in objective respiratory and subjective quality-of-life outcome measures are maintained. Adverse events are uncommon. UAS is a successful and appropriate long-term treatment for individuals with moderate to severe OSA. © American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apnea hypopnea index; clinical; cranial nerve; device; hypoglossal nerve; implant; long term; obstructive sleep apnea; quality of life; sleep

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26577774     DOI: 10.1177/0194599815616618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  42 in total

1.  Hyoid Arch Displacement with Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Tarek ElShebiny; Divya Venkat; Kingman Strohl; Mark G Hans; Aurelio Alonso; Juan Martin Palomo
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  [Stimulation for sleep apnea : Targeting the hypoglossal nerve in the treatment of patients with OSA].

Authors:  C Heiser; B Hofauer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Evaluation of body position in upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea-is continuous voltage sufficient enough?

Authors:  Armin Steffen; Julia T Hartmann; Inke R König; Madeline J L Ravesloot; Benedikt Hofauer; Clemens Heiser
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 4.  [Hypoglossal nerve stimulation in patients with CPAP failure : Evolution of an alternative treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea].

Authors:  C Heiser; B Hofauer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary Alternatives to CPAP Program for CPAP-Intolerant Patients.

Authors:  Anita Valanju Shelgikar; Sharon Aronovich; Jeffrey J Stanley
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Stimulating therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Patrick J Strollo; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Upper Airway Stimulation for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Evaluation and Comparison of Outcomes at Two Academic Centers.

Authors:  Colin Huntley; Thomas Kaffenberger; Karl Doghramji; Ryan Soose; Maurits Boon
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Effects of upper-airway stimulation on sleep architecture in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Benedikt Hofauer; Pierre Philip; Markus Wirth; Andreas Knopf; Clemens Heiser
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  Treatments for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Michael W Calik
Journal:  J Clin Outcomes Manag       Date:  2016-04

10.  Selective upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea: a single center clinical experience.

Authors:  Clemens Heiser; Andreas Knopf; Murat Bas; Constanze Gahleitner; Benedikt Hofauer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.