Literature DB >> 26577120

Importance of Absent Neoplastic Epithelium in Patients Treated With Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Malin Enblad1, Helgi Birgisson2, Alkwin Wanders3, Filip Sköldberg2, Lana Ghanipour2, Wilhelm Graf2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of absent neoplastic epithelium in specimens from cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and prognostic value of histopathology without neoplastic epithelium in patients treated with CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
METHODS: Data were extracted from medical records and histopathology reports for patients treated with initial CRS and HIPEC at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, between 2004 and 2012. Patients with inoperable disease and patients undergoing palliative non-CRS surgery were excluded from the study. Patients lacking neoplastic epithelium in surgical specimens from CRS, with or without mucin, were classified as "neoplastic epithelium absent" (NEA), and patients with neoplastic epithelium were classified as "neoplastic epithelium present" (NEP).
RESULTS: The study observed NEA in 78 of 353 patients (22 %). Mucin was found in 28 of the patients with NEA. For low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and adenomas, the 5-year overall survival rate was 100 % for NEA and 84 % for NEP, and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 100 % for NEA and 59 % for NEP. For appendiceal/colorectal adenocarcinomas (including tumors of the small intestine), the 5-year overall survival rate was 61 % for NEA and 38 % for NEP, and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 60 % for NEA and 14 % for NEP. Carcinoembryonic antigen level, peritoneal cancer index, and completeness of the cytoreduction score were lower in patients with NEA.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC have NEA. These patients have a favorable prognosis and a decreased risk of recurrence. Differences in patient selection can affect the proportion of NEA and hence explain differences in survival rates between reported series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26577120     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4989-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  4 in total

1.  Validating the PSOGI classification of peritoneal disease from non-carcinoid epithelial appendiceal neoplasms in the curative and palliative setting: an observational retrospective study.

Authors:  Nina Farrokhnia; Henrik Benoni; Lana Ghanipour; Peter H Cashin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-04

2.  Ratio of Pathological Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Patients Undergoing Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Correlates with Survival.

Authors:  Eyal Mor; Dan Assaf; Shachar Laks; Haggai Benvenisti; Gal Schtrechman; David Hazzan; Lior Segev; Ronel Yaka; Einat Shacham-Shmueli; Ofer Margalit; Naama Halpern; Daria Perelson; Monica-Inda Kaufmann; Almog Ben-Yaacov; Aviram Nissan; Mohammad Adileh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for perforated low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Haytham Abudeeb; Chelliah R Selvasekar; Sarah T O'Dwyer; Bipasha Chakrabarty; Lee Malcolmson; Andrew G Renehan; Malcolm S Wilson; Omer Aziz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Gains of Chromosome 1p and 15q are Associated with Poor Survival After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Treating Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases.

Authors:  Malin Enblad; Wilhelm Graf; Alexei Terman; Pascal Pucholt; Björn Viklund; Anders Isaksson; Helgi Birgisson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.