Literature DB >> 26576736

Motion correction using anatomical information in PET/CT and PET/MR hybrid imaging.

Hadi Fayad1, Frederic Lamare, Thibaut Merlin, Dimitris Visvikis.   

Abstract

Respiratory and cardiac motion causes qualitative and quantitative inaccuracies in whole body multi-modality imaging such as positron emission tomography coupled with computed tomography (PET/CT) and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI). Solutions presented to date include motion synchronized PET and corresponding anatomical acquisitions (four dimensional [4D] PET/CT, 4D PET/MR), frequently referred to as the gating approach. This method is based on the acquisition of an external surrogate using an external device (pressure belt, optical monitoring system, spirometer etc.), subsequently used to bin PET and CT or MR anatomical data into a number of gates. A first limitation of this method is the low signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the resulting motion synchronized PET frames, given that every reconstructed frame contains only part of the count statistics available throughout a motion average PET acquisition. Another limitation is that the complex motion of internal organs cannot be fully estimated, characterized and modelled using a mono-dimensional motion signal. In order to resolve such issues, many advanced techniques have been proposed which include three consecutive major steps. These are based on firstly acquiring an external or internal motion surrogate, estimating or modelling the internal motion using anatomical information extracted from 4D anatomical images (CT and/or MR) and finally correcting for motion either in the PET raw data space, the image space or incorporate it within the PET image reconstruction which is the most optimal based motion correction method in PET/CT and in PET/MR imaging. Current research efforts are concentrating on combining the last two steps within a joint motion estimation/motion correction approach, the exploitation of MRI specific motion characterization sequences and the combination of both respiratory and cardiac motion corrections. The goal of this review is to present and discuss the different steps of all these motion correction methods in PET/CT and PET/MR imaging for whole body applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26576736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1824-4785            Impact factor:   2.346


  5 in total

1.  The need of standardization and of large clinical studies in an emerging indication of [18F]FDG PET: the autoimmune encephalitis.

Authors:  Silvia Morbelli; Javier Arbizu; Jan Booij; Ming-Kai Chen; Gael Chetelat; Donna J Cross; Mehdi Djekidel; Alexander Drzezga; Ozgul Ekmekcioglu; Valentina Garibotto; Swen Hesse; Kazunari Ishii; Lida Jafari; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ian Law; Dana Mathews; Satoshi Minoshima; Karina Mosci; Marco Pagani; Sabina Pappata; Daniel Hillel Silverman; Alberto Signore; Elsmarieke Van De Giessen; Victor Villemagne; Henryk Barthel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Roadmap toward the 10 ps time-of-flight PET challenge.

Authors:  Paul Lecoq; Christian Morel; John O Prior; Dimitris Visvikis; Stefan Gundacker; Etiennette Auffray; Peter Križan; Rosana Martinez Turtos; Dominique Thers; Edoardo Charbon; Joao Varela; Christophe de La Taille; Angelo Rivetti; Dominique Breton; Jean-François Pratte; Johan Nuyts; Suleman Surti; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Paul Marsden; Katia Parodi; Jose Maria Benlloch; Mathieu Benoit
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Hypoglycemia-Triggered Motion Artifact on 68Ga-DOTA-TOC Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Piyush Chandra; Satish Nath
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 4.  Hybrid cardiac imaging using PET/MRI: a joint position statement by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Felix Nensa; Fabian Bamberg; Christoph Rischpler; Leon Menezes; Thorsten D Poeppel; Christian la Fougère; Dietrich Beitzke; Sazan Rasul; Christian Loewe; Konstantin Nikolaou; Jan Bucerius; Andreas Kjaer; Matthias Gutberlet; Niek H Prakken; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Riemer H J A Slart; Stephan G Nekolla; Martin L Lassen; Bernd J Pichler; Thomas Schlosser; Alexis Jacquier; Harald H Quick; Michael Schäfers; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of two elastic motion correction approaches for whole-body PET/CT: motion deblurring vs gate-to-gate motion correction.

Authors:  Stefanie Pösse; Florian Büther; Dirk Mannweiler; Inki Hong; Judson Jones; Michael Schäfers; Klaus Peter Schäfers
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.