| Literature DB >> 26576735 |
Joke Devriese1, Laurence Beels, Alex Maes, Christophe Van De Wiele, Olivier Gheysens, Hans Pottel.
Abstract
With the routine use of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans, metabolic activity of tumors can be quantitatively assessed through calculation of SUVs. One possible normalization parameter for the standardized uptake value (SUV) is lean body mass (LBM), which is generally calculated through predictive equations based on height and body weight. (Semi-)direct measurements of LBM could provide more accurate results in cancer populations than predictive equations based on healthy populations. In this context, four methods to determine LBM are reviewed: bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. CT, and magnetic resonance imaging. These methods were selected based on clinical accessibility and are compared in terms of methodology, precision and accuracy. By assessing each method's specific advantages and limitations, a well-considered choice of method can hopefully lead to more accurate SUVLBM values, hence more accurate quantitative assessment of 18F-FDG PET images.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26576735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1824-4785 Impact factor: 2.346