Literature DB >> 26576714

Variation of Quality of Life Data Collection Across INTERMACS Sites.

Bhanu P Gupta1, Kathleen L Grady2, Tim Fendler3, Philip G Jones3, John A Spertus3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the importance of patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) after mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device implantation, the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) collects the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) before and after MCS. The success of data collection and potential implications of missing data on HRQL analyses are unknown.
METHODS: We examined the frequency and reasons for not collecting baseline and 3-month KCCQ data across INTERMACS sites from May 2012 to December 2013. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to examine site variability (median odds ratios [MOR]) for not collecting KCCQ data to demonstrate the degree to which some sites can collect more complete data than others.
RESULTS: Among 3960 and 3523 patients participating in INTERMACS before and 3 months after left ventricular assist device implantation, the KCCQ was not collected in 43.1% at baseline (range across sites, 0-100%) and 40.9% (range, 0-100%) at follow-up. The most common reasons for incomplete KCCQ data at baseline were that the patient was too sick (13.9%) and consent to participate in research was not obtained (12.4%). Significant variation across sites was observed for missingness because of patient (MOR, 2.8; P < .001) and administrative (MOR, 4.8; P < .001) reasons. The most variable patient reasons were that the patients were too stressed (MOR, 7.2; P < .001) and too busy (MOR, 10.6; P < .001). The most variable administrative reasons were that the coordinator was too busy/forgot (MOR, 7.1; P < .001) and miscellaneous reasons (MOR, 8.7; P < .001). At 3 months, significant variation persisted for both patient (MOR, 2.7; P < .001) and administrative (MOR, 3.5; P < .001) reasons. The most variability across sites was that the patient was too busy (MOR, 6.0, P < .001) and that the coordinator was too busy/forgot (MOR, 5.8; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Sites vary substantially in collecting KCCQ data, and many of these variations seem addressable. Improving the consistency of HRQL data collection can improve the value of INTERMACS in defining the patient-centered benefits of MCS treatment.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health-related quality of life (HRQL); INTERMACS; Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26576714     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  8 in total

1.  Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in an Unselected Population: A Report From the STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

Authors:  Suzanne V Arnold; John A Spertus; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Zhuokai Li; Roland A Matsouaka; Suzanne J Baron; Amit N Vora; Michael J Mack; Matthew R Reynolds; John S Rumsfeld; David J Cohen
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Changes in disease-specific versus generic health status measures after left ventricular assist device implantation: Insights from INTERMACS.

Authors:  Michael E Nassif; John A Spertus; Philip G Jones; Timothy J Fendler; Larry A Allen; Kathleen L Grady; Suzanne V Arnold
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Research engagement and experiences of patients pre- and post-implant of a left ventricular assist device from the mechanical circulatory support measures of adjustment and quality of life (MCS A-QOL) study.

Authors:  Allison J Carroll; Elizabeth A Hahn; Kathleen L Grady
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.440

4.  Predicting Quality of Life at 1 Year After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in a Real-World Population.

Authors:  Suzanne V Arnold; David J Cohen; David Dai; Philip G Jones; Fan Li; Laine Thomas; Suzanne J Baron; Naftali Z Frankel; Susan Strong; Roland A Matsouaka; Fred H Edwards; J Matthew Brennan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-10

5.  Causes and Consequences of Missing Health-Related Quality of Life Assessments in Patients Who Undergo Mechanical Circulatory Support Implantation: Insights From INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).

Authors:  Kathleen L Grady; Philip G Jones; Adin Cristian-Andrei; David C Naftel; Susan Myers; Mary Amanda Dew; Katharine Idrissi; Gerdi Weidner; Sherri A Wissman; James K Kirklin; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-12

6.  Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in a "Real World" Population: Insights From a Prospective Canadian Database.

Authors:  Sandra B Lauck; Maggie Yu; Lillian Ding; Sean Hardiman; Daniel Wong; Janarthanan Sathananthan; Jian Ye; Albert Chan; Steven Hodge; Simon Robinson; David A Wood; John G Webb
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-04-24

7.  Sex Differences in Recovery and Device Replacement After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy.

Authors:  Lisa-Marie Maukel; Gerdi Weidner; Jan Beyersmann; Heike Spaderna
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.106

8.  Impact of preoperative versus postoperative dialysis on left ventricular assist device outcomes: An analysis from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database.

Authors:  J Hunter Mehaffey; Ryan Cantor; Susan Myers; Nicholas R Teman; John A Kern; Gorav Ailawadi; Francis Pagani; James Kirklin; Kenan Yount; Leora Yarboro
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-01-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.