Literature DB >> 26576469

Direct Light-Driven Water Oxidation by a Ladder-Type Conjugated Polymer Photoanode.

Pauline Bornoz1, Mathieu S Prévot1, Xiaoyun Yu1, Néstor Guijarro1, Kevin Sivula1.   

Abstract

A conjugated polymer known for high stability (poly[benzimidazobenzophenanthroline], coded as BBL) is examined as a photoanode for direct solar water oxidation. In aqueous electrolyte with a sacrificial hole acceptor (SO3(2-)), photoelectrodes show a morphology-dependent performance. Films prepared by a dispersion-spray method with a nanostructured surface (feature size of ∼20 nm) gave photocurrents up to 0.23 ± 0.02 mA cm(-2) at 1.23 VRHE under standard simulated solar illumination. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy reveals a constant flat-band potential over a wide pH range at +0.31 VNHE. The solar water oxidation photocurrent with bare BBL electrodes is found to increase with increasing pH, and no evidence of semiconductor oxidation was observed over a 30 min testing time. Characterization of the photo-oxidation reaction suggests H2O2 or •OH production with the bare film, while functionalization of the interface with 1 nm of TiO2 followed by a nickel-cobalt catalyst gave solar photocurrents of 20-30 μA cm(-2), corresponding with O2 evolution. Limitations to photocurrent production are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26576469      PMCID: PMC4683565          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


Photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells have long held promise as an inexpensive route for the storage of solar energy as chemical bonds.[1] A dual band gap tandem cell with an n-type semiconductor photoanode connected in series to a p-type photocathode can split water into O2 and H2 at a solar-to-hydrogen (STH) efficiency potentially over 20% even assuming reasonable losses.[2] However, economically competitive PEC H2 production at a scale commensurate with the global energy demand requires not only high efficiency but also long-term stability and the ability to construct large-area devices at a fraction of the cost of traditional high-performance semiconductor devices.[3] While many promising semiconducting materials are currently under development, the identification of new robust photoelectrode materials with ideal energy levels and inexpensive production is urgently needed. One class of semiconductors that offers tunable energy levels and processability in many solvents is the π-conjugated organic polymers. While their promising aspects have motivated intense investigation for economical roll-to-roll organic photovoltaic (OPV) devices, due to their poor stability in aqueous conditions, they have not been generally pursued as photoelectrodes for direct solar water splitting.[4] Encapsulated OPVs have recently been demonstrated in PV-biased photoelectosynthetic cells for solar water splitting,[5] but the lack of intrinsic material stability limits their application in this configuration. Polymeric carbon nitride based materials[6] and conjugated microporous network polymers[7] have recently shown promising performance for the direct solar water reduction, suggesting that conjugated carbon-based materials can be suitable as photocathodes. However, the task of identifying suitable π-conjugated materials for the photoanode is more difficult due to the harsh conditions of photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Organic dyes based on porphyrins or perylene diimides (PDIs) can possess HOMO levels suitable for water oxidation in certain conditions.[8−10] However, solution-processing these materials can be problematic given their strong tendency to aggregate.[11] As certain conjugated polymers can possess similar energy levels to porphyrin and PDI dyes while also exhibiting superior film forming characteristics and improved intrinsic stability, we hypothesized that they could be viable candidates for inexpensive solution-processed photoanodes. Here we present promising performance and stability of an n-type polymer, poly(benzimidazobenzophenanthroline), known as BBL, as a photoanode in a direct semiconductor-liquid junction (SCLJ) configuration for solar water oxidation. Indeed, among n-type conjugated polymers BBL is a ladder-type polymer known for exceptional stability[12] and good electron mobility up to 0.1 cm2 V–1 s–1.[13] BBL has been reported as an electron acceptor in OPV cells,[14] as a buffer layer for inorganic thin-film PV,[15] and for n-channel field-effect transistors.[16] These favorable aspects encouraged us to consider BBL for PEC application. To begin our investigation of BBL as a potential photoanode material, we first examined the effect of the thin-film morphology on the extraction of photogenerated charges. Indeed, the relatively short excited-state transport length expected in BBL[17] suggests a high surface area mesostructured SCLJ would be beneficial to charge extraction similar to a bulk heterojunction OPV. BBL thin-films were prepared via two different deposition techniques: dip coating from a BBL solution in methanesulfonic acid (MSA)[19] and spray deposition of an aqueous BBL nanofiber dispersion. (18,20) See Supporting Information for full details of the thin-film formation methods. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Figure ) reveals considerable morphological differences with respect to the deposition technique. While both films display a homogeneous coverage of the FTO, the dip-coated film (Figure a) shows a relatively smooth surface with feature size similar to the underlying FTO (100–500 nm, see additional SEM images in Figure S1). In contrast, the spray-coated film (Figure b) exhibits feature size as small as 20 nm and a higher roughness due to the interconnecting network formed from the nanofiber dispersion.
Figure 1

SEM top view of an optimized dip-coated (a) and sprayed (b) films with optical images of both electrodes (c). Panel (d) shows the J–V curve of a thin sprayed film (blue line) and a dip-coated film (red line) in sacrificial electrolyte (0.5 M Na2SO3, pH 7) under chopped light substrate-side illumination (scan rate 10 mV s–1).

SEM top view of an optimized dip-coated (a) and sprayed (b) films with optical images of both electrodes (c). Panel (d) shows the J–V curve of a thin sprayed film (blue line) and a dip-coated film (red line) in sacrificial electrolyte (0.5 M Na2SO3, pH 7) under chopped light substrate-side illumination (scan rate 10 mV s–1). To determine the effect of the morphology on the PEC performance we prepared films using both deposition methods to have similar light absorption (Figure c). The absorptance spectra (Figure S2) reveal a maximum of ∼40% light absorption at λ = 590 nm, corresponding to an average thickness of 40 nm based on the reported absorption coefficient.[21] A Tauc plot analysis verified a direct band gap transition at 1.86 eV matching previously reported values.[13] We note that preparing thicker films by dip coating was not possible given solubility limitations. The two similarly absorbing films were next examined by linear scanning voltammetry (LSV) in a three-electrode PEC cell using a buffered aqueous electrolyte (pH 7) and a hole scavenger (SO32–) under intermittent simulated solar illumination (100 mW cm–2). The oxidation of SO32– is thermodynamically and kinetically more facile than the oxidation of water.[22] As such, measuring photocurrent for SO32– oxidation enables the investigation of the PEC properties of BBL with minimum kinetic limitations. The LSV data are presented in Figure d with respect to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). Both BBL electrodes show an anodic photocurrent upon illumination (n-type behavior) and reproducibility in the potential range scanned. Moreover, the LSV behavior offers insight into charge transport and transfer. The dip-coated film exhibits transient spikes when illuminated in the photocurrent onset range (from +0.7 to 1.0 VRHE), suggesting a limitation of charge transfer to the SO32– (accumulation of holes at the SCLJ). In contrast, only small spikes are seen in the spray-coated film, and the photocurrent density in the plateau region (from +1.0–1.3 VRHE) is 6.5 times higher. Given the similar light absorption of the two electrodes, it is reasonable to conclude that greater photocurrent density of the spray-coated film results from the porous morphology, which facilitates harvesting of the photoexcited states due to their short transport distance. Optimization of the spray-coating deposition method showed that films thicker than 40 nm gave higher photocurrent density, Jph, (Figure S3). Electrodes with a thickness of about 120 nm gave an average Jph of 0.23 ± 0.02 mA cm–2 at +1.23 VRHE, while thicker films gave lower values. Jph was consistently ∼30% larger for substrate-side illumination (compared to electrolyte-side) indicating a limitation in majority carrier (electron) transport. This observation together with the effect of the nanostructure are consistent with free charge generation occurring exclusively in high proximity to the SCLJ, where excitons are split either by direct hole injection into the electrolyte or a space-charge electric field. The electron transport could be perhaps limited due to grain boundaries between the individual fibers. To next obtain information regarding the electronic structure of the SCLJ and determine the suitability of BBL to oxidize water, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and Mott–Schottky (M–S) analysis were performed on spray-coated electrodes at various pH without sacrificial hole acceptors. We used thicker films (230 nm) to avoid direct substrate–electrolyte contact. Figure a shows the M–S plot obtained using the space charge capacitance, Csc, extracted from the Nyquist plots (Figure S4), which were fit with a simple Randle equivalent circuit (Figure a inset). For each pH, the expected accumulation region, where Csc–2 is small, is observed in Figure a at potentials <∼ +0.25 V vs the normal hydrogen electrode (VNHE). At more positive voltages, an increase in Csc–2 is observed consistent with a space-charge depletion region. Complete depletion of the semiconductor film leads to a leveling-off of Csc–2 at higher applied potentials. We note that application of the M–S model rigorously requires a planar electrode. The sublinear onset of the depletion region is reasonably due to a changing effective surface area as the small features of the electrodes are depleted.[23] Given the nanostructure, the flat band potential, EFB, will be overestimated by extrapolating the linear region of the plots, and thus EFB is better estimated by regression of the onset region of Csc–2. Nevertheless, it is clear that in the pH range from 3.5 to 10.5, EFB only varies slightly with pH. We estimate a value for EFB of +0.31 ± 0.03 VNHE, which is consistent with the observed onset of photocurrent when using the sacrificial hole acceptor SO32–. In contrast, at pH 1.9 a positive shift of EFB to +0.40 V is observed. While inorganic oxide semiconductors typically exhibit a Nernstian shift with pH due to the dynamic equilibrium of H+ and OH– adsorption/desorption,[24] it is likely that few (if any) species adsorb at the BBL/electrolyte interface in the pH range from 3.5 to 10.5 leading to the constant EFB. In contrast, the known acido-basic behavior of BBL with a pKa of 2.2[25] could explain the shift of EFB at pH 1.9.
Figure 2

(a) Mott–Schottky plot from a sprayed-deposited BBL film in aqueous electrolyte (buffered sulfate/phosphate) at various pH. A Randle equivalent circuit was used to fit the impedance data (inset). (b) Energy band diagram of BBL under flat-band condition at pH 3 and 10. (c) J–V (LSV, 10 mV s–1) curve in aqueous sulfate/phosphate electrolyte (pH 7) under chopped illumination. The inset shows the evolution of the photocurrent density at 1.23 VRHE with the pH.

(a) Mott–Schottky plot from a sprayed-deposited BBL film in aqueous electrolyte (buffered sulfate/phosphate) at various pH. A Randle equivalent circuit was used to fit the impedance data (inset). (b) Energy band diagram of BBL under flat-band condition at pH 3 and 10. (c) J–V (LSV, 10 mV s–1) curve in aqueous sulfate/phosphate electrolyte (pH 7) under chopped illumination. The inset shows the evolution of the photocurrent density at 1.23 VRHE with the pH. The EFB estimation together with the band gap and LUMO position[13] allow construction of an energy band diagram of BBL in water at flat-band conditions for different pH (Figure b). At pH 3 the HOMO is well-positioned for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), and the driving force for the OER reasonably increases with pH given the constant EFB of the BBL. To evaluate the ability of the bare BBL to directly photo-oxidize water, we next measured 230 nm-thick spray-coated electrodes in aqueous electrolyte without a sacrificial hole scavenger at different pH. An example of a LSV at pH 7 is given in Figure c. Here the onset of photocurrent is similar to the sacrificial case, however the photocurrent density is considerably smaller and large transient spikes are observed, especially near the photocurrent onset potential. Remarkably, sustained photocurrent was observed as a plateau region of the LSV from ∼ +0.9–1.4 V. The sustained Jph in the plateau region (after the decay of the transient, taken to be 15 s, see Figure S5) under continuous 1 sun illumination (100 mW cm–2) in different pH is given in the inset of Figure c. The magnitude of Jph increases with pH consistent with the increasing driving force. Importantly, the possibility that the photocurrent arises from oxidation of the BBL itself was eliminated through longer stability measurements (Figures S6 and S7 ). See full discussion in the Supporting Information. The incident photon-to-current spectrum (IPCE, Figure S8) verifies that the photocurrent in nonsacrificial electrolyte at pH 7 arises from light absorption by the BBL. However, the observed reduction of the IPCE when using a white light bias can be ascribed to increased geminate recombination in the film,[26] and brings into question the nature of the sustained oxidation reaction occurring on the bare electrode (see Supporting Information for full explanation). In fact the observation of O2 production by gas chromatography was unsuccessful despite that the expected concentration was within GC detection limits. This suggests that molecular O2 is not the product of the sustained photo-oxidation reaction. Another possibility is that water oxidation occurs via a two-electron process producing H2O2. This oxidation is thermodynamically feasible (E = +1.8 VRHE),[27] as it corresponds roughly to the estimated HOMO level position under flat band conditions at pH 6. Moreover ketonic functional groups on BBL could support the production of H2O2 similar to observations on oxidized carbon nanotubes.[28] However, H2O2 was not directly detectable in the electrolyte using titration with KMnO4, likely because the produced H2O2 is directly reduced at the anode to produce the hydroxyl radical (•OH).[29] The occurrence of this pathway can be detected by using a florescence probe technique,[29,30] wherein coumarin reacts with hydroxyl radicals to produce a new compound (umbelliferone, see Figure a) quantifiable by photoluminescence spectroscopy. To demonstrate the production of the hydroxyl radical by BBL, a solution of coumarin (Figure S9) was used as described in the Supporting Information.
Figure 3

(a) The fluorescence probe reaction used to detect hydroxyl radicals (top) is shown together with the fluorescence spectra of buffered sulfate/phosphate aqueous electrolyte (pH 7) containing 0.1 mM coumarin (before test) and after the photoelectrochemical experiment at 1.23 V vs RHE for 1 and 2 h. (b) Comparison of the hydroxyl radical concentration estimated by the fluorescence probe to the calculated concentration from the photocurrent density.

(a) The fluorescence probe reaction used to detect hydroxyl radicals (top) is shown together with the fluorescence spectra of buffered sulfate/phosphate aqueous electrolyte (pH 7) containing 0.1 mM coumarin (before test) and after the photoelectrochemical experiment at 1.23 V vs RHE for 1 and 2 h. (b) Comparison of the hydroxyl radical concentration estimated by the fluorescence probe to the calculated concentration from the photocurrent density. The photoluminescence spectra of the original electrolyte and after one or 2 h under photoelectrochemical operation with BBL are shown in Figure a, where peaks for coumarin at 374 nm and for umbelliferone at 450 nm are observed. The concentration of the umbelliferone in the electrolyte was estimated using a calibration curve (Figure S10) and is compared to the maximum amount of •OH that could have been produced (based on the integrated Jph, and assuming 100% Faradaic efficiency) in Figure b. While the concentrations differ in magnitude significantly due to the low expected yield of the coumarin reaction[29] and other potential factors decreasing the umbelliferone production,[32] the rate of increase in the concentrations indicates a direct linear relation suggesting that the production of umbelliferone is correlated to the photocurrent and supporting the notion that the bare BBL produces the hydroxyl radical through photo-oxidation. Other possible routes for the production of •OH are discussed in the Supporting Information. Regardless of the origin of the •OH, its production—instead of molecular O2 via the four-electron OER—is consistent with the lack of defined catalytic center on the bare BBL. Given the demonstrated photoelectrochemical stability of the bare BBL photoanode and the thermodynamic suitability for water oxidation we next sought to show O2 production by applying an appropriate co-catalyst overlayer. Attempts to directly attach an OER catalyst to the BBL surface did not result in sustained O2 production, likely due to poor semiconductor/catalyst attachment. However, when the BBL was pretreated with a sufficiently thin layer of TiO2 (∼1 nm) to act as a tunnel junction, a suitable surface could be obtained (Figure S11) that allowed successful attachment of a nickelcobalt catalyst.[34] LSV data are shown in Figure S12 for the film before and after the TiO2 and with the co-catalyst. Application of the TiO2 did not significantly change the observed Jph (∼15–20 μA cm–2), however a slight increase (to ∼30 μA cm–2) was observed upon the application of the co-catalyst layer. Photocurrent transient spikes remain at all conditions. Despite this, gas chromatography confirmed molecular O2 production at a rate of 20 ± 3 nmol h–1 during a constant-illumination chronoamperometry measurement when a steady-state Jph of 10.3 ± 0.1 μA cm–2 was produced corresponding to a Faradaic efficiency of 82 ± 16% (similar to the value obtained with a related system).[10] Overall the similar onset behavior and Jph observed with the overlayer present, compared to the bare film in sacrificial and nonsacrificial electrolytes, suggest that charge separation in the semiconductor layer is kinetically limited by interfacial exciton dissociation[35] and thus ultimately controlled by the driving force as previously discussed. The use of a solid-state semiconductor heterojunction or other overlayers specifically designed to enhance free charge generation is a reasonable strategy to increase the photocurrent in BBL electrodes, and efforts in this direction are underway in our laboratory. In summary, our investigations of BBL as a photoanode for solar water oxidation reveal a strong dependence of the sacrificial photocurrent density on the morphology of the film consistent with a limitation in excited-state transport to the SCLJ. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy showed that the driving force for water oxidation could be tuned with electrolyte pH and suggested that water oxidation is thermodynamically feasible. Furthermore, for the first time, a π-conjugated organic semiconductor demonstrated sustained direct solar water oxidation. The water oxidation photocurrent density was found to increase with increasing pH, and no evidence of semiconductor oxidation was found over testing time on the order of hours with bare BBL films. H2O2 or hydroxyl radical production proceeds, instead of molecular O2 evolution, on bare BBL likely due to the lack of catalytic sites. Notably the produced •OH could be employed to degrade organic pollutants in wastewater.[36] While molecular O2 evolution was measured upon functionalization with a Ni–Co catalyst, the smaller photocurrents observed for water oxidation, compared to the sacrificial case, suggest a limitation in charge separation, which is related to the driving force for charge injection into the electrolyte. Overall this demonstration suggests that robust n-type conjugated organic semiconductors are suitable for direct PEC water oxidation and opens a new path for the rational design and optimization of photoanodes for solar water splitting.
  11 in total

1.  Solar water splitting cells.

Authors:  Michael G Walter; Emily L Warren; James R McKone; Shannon W Boettcher; Qixi Mi; Elizabeth A Santori; Nathan S Lewis
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light.

Authors:  Xinchen Wang; Kazuhiko Maeda; Arne Thomas; Kazuhiro Takanabe; Gang Xin; Johan M Carlsson; Kazunari Domen; Markus Antonietti
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2008-11-09       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Visible-light-assisted photoelectrochemical water oxidation by thin films of a phosphonate-functionalized perylene diimide plus CoOx cocatalyst.

Authors:  Joel T Kirner; Jordan J Stracke; Brian A Gregg; Richard G Finke
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 9.229

4.  Modeling practical performance limits of photoelectrochemical water splitting based on the current state of materials research.

Authors:  Linsey C Seitz; Zhebo Chen; Arnold J Forman; Blaise A Pinaud; Jesse D Benck; Thomas F Jaramillo
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 8.928

5.  Metal-free organic sensitizers for use in water-splitting dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical cells.

Authors:  John R Swierk; Dalvin D Méndez-Hernández; Nicholas S McCool; Paul Liddell; Yuichi Terazono; Ian Pahk; John J Tomlin; Nolan V Oster; Thomas A Moore; Ana L Moore; Devens Gust; Thomas E Mallouk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution at surface-oxidized multiwall carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Xunyu Lu; Wai-Leung Yim; Bryan H R Suryanto; Chuan Zhao
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  High electron mobility in ladder polymer field-effect transistors.

Authors:  Amit Babel; Samson A Jenekhe
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Tunable organic photocatalysts for visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution.

Authors:  Reiner Sebastian Sprick; Jia-Xing Jiang; Baltasar Bonillo; Shijie Ren; Thanchanok Ratvijitvech; Pierre Guiglion; Martijn A Zwijnenburg; Dave J Adams; Andrew I Cooper
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Photoassisted overall water splitting in a visible light-absorbing dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical cell.

Authors:  W Justin Youngblood; Seung-Hyun Anna Lee; Yoji Kobayashi; Emil A Hernandez-Pagan; Paul G Hoertz; Thomas A Moore; Ana L Moore; Devens Gust; Thomas E Mallouk
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  A H2-evolving photocathode based on direct sensitization of MoS3 with an organic photovoltaic cell.

Authors:  Tiphaine Bourgeteau; Denis Tondelier; Bernard Geffroy; Romain Brisse; Christel Laberty-Robert; Stéphane Campidelli; Rémi de Bettignies; Vincent Artero; Serge Palacin; Bruno Jousselme
Journal:  Energy Sustain Soc       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.811

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Polymer Photoelectrodes for Solar Fuel Production: Progress and Challenges.

Authors:  Madasamy Thangamuthu; Qiushi Ruan; Peter Osei Ohemeng; Bing Luo; Dengwei Jing; Robert Godin; Junwang Tang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 72.087

2.  Fully conjugated ladder polymers.

Authors:  Jongbok Lee; Alexander J Kalin; Tianyu Yuan; Mohammed Al-Hashimi; Lei Fang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 9.825

3.  Understanding structure-activity relationships in linear polymer photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution.

Authors:  Michael Sachs; Reiner Sebastian Sprick; Drew Pearce; Sam A J Hillman; Adriano Monti; Anne A Y Guilbert; Nick J Brownbill; Stoichko Dimitrov; Xingyuan Shi; Frédéric Blanc; Martijn A Zwijnenburg; Jenny Nelson; James R Durrant; Andrew I Cooper
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Photoelectrochemical Behavior of PEDOT/Nanocarbon Electrodes: Fundamentals and Structure-Property Relationships.

Authors:  Attila Kormányos; Dorottya Hursán; Csaba Janáky
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  Photocatalytically active ladder polymers.

Authors:  Anastasia Vogel; Mark Forster; Liam Wilbraham; Charlotte L Smith; Alexander J Cowan; Martijn A Zwijnenburg; Reiner Sebastian Sprick; Andrew I Cooper
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 4.008

6.  Noble metal-free hydrogen-evolving photocathodes based on small molecule organic semiconductors.

Authors:  A Morozan; T Bourgeteau; D Tondelier; B Geffroy; B Jousselme; V Artero
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.874

7.  On-surface synthesis of π-conjugated ladder-type polymers comprising nonbenzenoid moieties.

Authors:  José I Urgel; Julian Bock; Marco Di Giovannantonio; Pascal Ruffieux; Carlo A Pignedoli; Milan Kivala; Roman Fasel
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Water Oxidation with Cobalt-Loaded Linear Conjugated Polymer Photocatalysts.

Authors:  Reiner Sebastian Sprick; Zheng Chen; Alexander J Cowan; Yang Bai; Catherine M Aitchison; Yuanxing Fang; Martijn A Zwijnenburg; Andrew I Cooper; Xinchen Wang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 16.823

9.  Visible light-driven simultaneous water oxidation and quinone reduction by a nano-structured conjugated polymer without co-catalysts.

Authors:  Jully Patel; Xiaojiao Yuan; Stéphanie Mendes Marinho; Winfried Leibl; Hynd Remita; Ally Aukauloo
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 9.825

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.