Literature DB >> 26576279

Unusual U wave induced by reconstructed retrosternal esophagus.

Kenichiro Yamagata1, Kansei Uno2, Kazuhiko Mori3, Yasuyuki Seto3.   

Abstract

The present case shows that a broad compression of the right ventricle by the reconstructed stomach tube after esophagus cancer surgery induced an abnormal U wave. When facing an abnormal ECG, we should keep in mind of the mechanical compression to the heart as a differential diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrography; U wave; esophagus surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 26576279      PMCID: PMC4641481          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


Background

ECG abnormalities, especially in the ST segments are caused by many reasons such as genetic diseases, cardiac ischemia, and electrolyte disorders 1. Aside these internal reasons, direct mechanical compression to the heart can also induce ECG changes such as Brugada-like ECG 2. As the heart is usually protected in the mediastinum, there are limited case reports for these mechanical compression-induced ECG abnormalities. We describe here a case of a mechanical compression from the right ventricular outflow tract to the right ventricle inducing an abnormal U-wave morphology.

Case Presentation

A 69-year-old woman was referred to our hospital due to ECG abnormality after retrosternal reconstruction surgery for esophageal cancer. ECG before the surgery showed no abnormality (Fig. 1A). At the first visit, ECG showed a prominent unusual shaped U wave in the right precordial leads (V1-V3) despite least change in other leads (Fig. 1B). Electrolyte levels were all within normal limits and no drug was prescribed. The plain chest CT demonstrated compression of not only the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), but also the right ventricle free wall by the reconstructed stomach tube (Fig. 1C). Transthoracic echocardiogram showed the compression of the right ventricle without any abnormal valvular disease and left ventricular wall motion. The U-wave morphology in the precordial leads changed for every visit (Fig. 1D). During the follow-up, the patient had symptomatic sinus bradycardia and a permanent pacemaker was implanted. Though the heart rate increased and the symptom improved, the U wave did not shorten (Fig. 1D). The patient has no symptoms as palpitations or syncope up to now.
Figure 1

(A), ECG before esophagus reconstruction. (B), ECG of the first visit at our hospital. (C), Plain CT of the chest. The reconstructed stomach tube is compressing the RVOT and RV free wall. (D), Precordial leads of the 12-lead ECG at each visit. Eso, reconstructed stomach tube, SVC, superior vena cava, RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract, LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract, Ao, aorta, RV, right ventricle, RA, right atrium, LV, left ventricle.

(A), ECG before esophagus reconstruction. (B), ECG of the first visit at our hospital. (C), Plain CT of the chest. The reconstructed stomach tube is compressing the RVOT and RV free wall. (D), Precordial leads of the 12-lead ECG at each visit. Eso, reconstructed stomach tube, SVC, superior vena cava, RVOT, right ventricular outflow tract, LVOT, left ventricular outflow tract, Ao, aorta, RV, right ventricle, RA, right atrium, LV, left ventricle.

Discussion

Mechanical compression of the RVOT is reported to cause a Brugada-like ECG showing an ST segment elevation in the right precordial leads, due to loss of the action potential dome at RVOT sites 3. In the present case, the ECG had some ST segment elevation in leads V1-V3 though it looks clearly different from Brugada-type ECG, and the loss of dome usually does not induce U wave. As hypothermia is reported to induce repolarization abnormalities, ECG was recorded during the patient taking ice-cold water and no change was found 4. Bradycardia is also another cause of U wave, but was negated as the U wave was still present after pacemaker implantation 5. Interpretation of T wave and U wave on ECG is occasionally difficult and there is no absolute definition to distinguish them as in the current case 6. We therefore defined the unusual wave seen in V1-V3 as a U wave by the assessment proposed by Postema et al. 7. Briefly, the end of the T wave is the intersection of a tangent to the steepest slope of the last limb of the T wave and the baseline in lead II or V5. Measured corrected QT interval calculated by Bazett's formula for all ECG was stably around 420 msec. M cell has the longest action potential duration among the three myocardial layers, hence we speculated that the broad mechanical compression to the broad right ventricle caused the electrical dissociation between the epi- and endocardial layer, and the authentic power of the M cell became visible through the right precordial ECG 8. The extent of the compression may have made the change for each ECG. As the heart is usually protected in the mediastinum, the incidence of mechanical compression to the heart inducing ECG abnormality is rare. However, we must be aware of these causes for differential diagnosis for ECG abnormalities as the therapeutic strategy may change.

Conflict of Interest

Nothing to declare.
  8 in total

1.  Brugada-like electrocardiographic pattern in a patient with a mediastinal tumor.

Authors:  N Tarín; J Farré; J M Rubio; J Tuñón; J Castro-Dorticós
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Prominent J wave and ST segment elevation: serial electrocardiographic changes in accidental hypothermia.

Authors:  Takashi Noda; Wataru Shimizu; Kouichi Tanaka; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-02

Review 3.  Acquired forms of the Brugada syndrome.

Authors:  Wataru Shimizu
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.438

4.  Inaccurate electrocardiographic interpretation of long QT: the majority of physicians cannot recognize a long QT when they see one.

Authors:  Sami Viskin; Uri Rosovski; Andrew J Sands; Edmond Chen; Peter M Kistler; Jonathan M Kalman; Laura Rodriguez Chavez; Pedro Iturralde Torres; Fernando E S Cruz F; Osmar A Centurión; Akira Fujiki; Philippe Maury; Xiaomin Chen; Andrew D Krahn; Franz Roithinger; Li Zhang; G Michael Vincent; David Zeltser
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  The enigmatic sixth wave of the electrocardiogram: the U wave.

Authors:  Andrés Ricardo Pérez Riera; Celso Ferreira; Celso Ferreira Filho; Marcelo Ferreira; Adriano Meneghini; Augusto Hiroshi Uchida; Edgardo Schapachnik; Sergio Dubner; Li Zhang
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.737

6.  Accurate electrocardiographic assessment of the QT interval: teach the tangent.

Authors:  Pieter G Postema; Jonas S S G De Jong; Ivo A C Van der Bilt; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Regional differences in electrophysiological properties of epicardium, midmyocardium, and endocardium. In vitro and in vivo correlations.

Authors:  E P Anyukhovsky; E A Sosunov; M R Rosen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Determinants of human immunodeficiency virus DNA and RNA shedding in the anal-rectal canal of homosexual men.

Authors:  N B Kiviat; C W Critchlow; S E Hawes; J Kuypers; C Surawicz; G Goldbaum; J A van Burik; T Lampinen; K K Holmes
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.226

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.