A U Eldeniz1, M Shehata2,3, C Högg2,3, F X Reichl2,3. 1. Department of Endodontics, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey. 2. Department of Operative/Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Pedodontics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 3. Walther-Straub-Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of a new silicate-based BioRoot RCS® sealer in comparison with contemporary sealers. METHODOLOGY: A periodontal ligament cell line using lentiviral gene transfer of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) was used and exposed to subtoxic concentrations of 24-h eluates from two epoxy resin-based (AH Plus Jet® and Acroseal® ), four various methacrylate-based endodontic sealers (EndoREZ® , RealSeal® , RealSeal SE® and Hybrid Root SEAL® ) and three silicate-based sealers (BioRoot RCS® , iRootSP® and MTA Fillapex® ). The XTT-based cell viability assay was used for cytotoxicity screening of materials. The γ-H2AX assay was used for genotoxicity screening. In the γ-H2AX immunofluorescence assay, PDL-hTERT cells were exposed to eluates of the substances for 6 h and DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) were detected microscopically. Induced foci represented DSBs, which can induce ATM-dependent phosphorylation of the histone H2AX. The statistical significance of the differences between the experimental groups was compared using the Student's t-test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The cytotoxicity of the 24-h eluates could be ranked in the following order: Hybrid Root SEAL® >RealSeal® >Acroseal® >RealSeal SE® ≥ AH Plus Jet® > EndoREZ® >MTA Fillapex® > iRoot SP® >BioRoot RCS® . In negative controls (cells which received medium only) 4.08 ± 0.53 DSB foci (mean ± SEM) whilst in positive controls 10.76 ± 4.05 DSB foci/cell were found. BioRoot RCS® and RealSeal SE® exhibited significant differences in foci formation at 1/3 EC50 compared with their 1/10 EC50 concentration (P < 0.05). Both concentrations (1/10 and 1/3 of EC50) of AH Plus Jet® , Acroseal® , RealSeal® and MTA Fillapex® sealers were not significantly different when compared with the medium control (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: New BioRoot RCS® was not toxic whilst Hybrid Root SEAL® demonstrated more toxicity and DNA double-strand breaks when compared with other resin- and silicate-based root canal sealers.
AIM: To investigate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of a new silicate-based BioRoot RCS® sealer in comparison with contemporary sealers. METHODOLOGY: A periodontal ligament cell line using lentiviral gene transfer of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) was used and exposed to subtoxic concentrations of 24-h eluates from two epoxy resin-based (AH Plus Jet® and Acroseal® ), four various methacrylate-based endodontic sealers (EndoREZ® , RealSeal® , RealSeal SE® and Hybrid Root SEAL® ) and three silicate-based sealers (BioRoot RCS® , iRootSP® and MTA Fillapex® ). The XTT-based cell viability assay was used for cytotoxicity screening of materials. The γ-H2AX assay was used for genotoxicity screening. In the γ-H2AX immunofluorescence assay, PDL-hTERT cells were exposed to eluates of the substances for 6 h and DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) were detected microscopically. Induced foci represented DSBs, which can induce ATM-dependent phosphorylation of the histone H2AX. The statistical significance of the differences between the experimental groups was compared using the Student's t-test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The cytotoxicity of the 24-h eluates could be ranked in the following order: Hybrid Root SEAL® >RealSeal® >Acroseal® >RealSeal SE® ≥ AH Plus Jet® > EndoREZ® >MTA Fillapex® > iRoot SP® >BioRoot RCS® . In negative controls (cells which received medium only) 4.08 ± 0.53 DSB foci (mean ± SEM) whilst in positive controls 10.76 ± 4.05 DSB foci/cell were found. BioRoot RCS® and RealSeal SE® exhibited significant differences in foci formation at 1/3 EC50 compared with their 1/10 EC50 concentration (P < 0.05). Both concentrations (1/10 and 1/3 of EC50) of AH Plus Jet® , Acroseal® , RealSeal® and MTA Fillapex® sealers were not significantly different when compared with the medium control (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: New BioRoot RCS® was not toxic whilst Hybrid Root SEAL® demonstrated more toxicity and DNA double-strand breaks when compared with other resin- and silicate-based root canal sealers.
Authors: Susanne Jung; Sonja Sielker; Marcel R Hanisch; Viktor Libricht; Edgar Schäfer; Till Dammaschke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 3.240