Lene A H Haakstad1, Beate Torset2, Kari Bø3. 1. Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Department of Sports Medicine, Norway. Electronic address: lahaakstad@nih.no. 2. Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Department of Sports Medicine, Norway. Electronic address: b.s.torset@nih.no. 3. Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Department of Sports Medicine, Norway. Electronic address: kari.bo@nih.no.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to examine the effects of supervised group exercise on maternal psychological outcomes and commonly reported pregnancy complaints. DESIGN: an observer-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway. PARTICIPANTS: 105 sedentary, nulliparous pregnant women, mean age 30.7(± 4.0) years, pre-pregnancy BMI 23.8 (± 4.3), were assigned to either exercise (n=52) or control group (n= 53) at mean gestation week 17.7 (± 4.2). INTERVENTION: the exercise intervention followed ACOG guidelines and included a 60 minutes general fitness class, with 40 minutes of endurance training/aerobic and 20 minutes of strength training and stretching/relaxation, performed at least twice per week for a minimum of 12 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: outcome measures were assessed through standardized interviews pre- and post-intervention (gestation week 36.6, ± 0.9), and included psychological variables related to quality of life, well-being, body image and pregnancy depression, as well as assessment of 13 commonly reported pregnancy complaints. FINDINGS: post-intervention, using intention to treat (ITT) analysis, women randomized to exercise rated their health significantly better compared to women in the control group (p=0.02) and reported less fatigue related to everyday activities (p=0.04). Women with complete exercise adherence (≥ 24 sessions) had significantly better scores on measurements of feelings related to sadness, hopelessness and anxiety (p<0.01), compared to the control group. Contradictory, the control group reported higher life enjoyment (p<0.01). There were no significant group differences in body-image or pregnancy depression. With respect to analysing pregnancy complaints according to ITT, no differences between the groups were found. A comparison of the women who attended ≥ 19 (80%, n=21) or ≥ 24 (100%, n=14) exercise sessions with the control-participants, showed that fewer women in the exercise group reported nausea/vomiting and numbness/poor circulation in legs. KEY CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION FOR PRACTISE: participation in regular group exercise during pregnancy contributed to improvements in some variables related to maternal well-being and quality of life. Women with high exercise adherence had significantly better results on several health variables reaping the highest benefits. A qualitative study exploring the barriers of women in achieving recommended amount of activity may be necessary to understand this population and developing better clinical practice educational tools.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: to examine the effects of supervised group exercise on maternal psychological outcomes and commonly reported pregnancy complaints. DESIGN: an observer-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway. PARTICIPANTS: 105 sedentary, nulliparous pregnant women, mean age 30.7(± 4.0) years, pre-pregnancy BMI 23.8 (± 4.3), were assigned to either exercise (n=52) or control group (n= 53) at mean gestation week 17.7 (± 4.2). INTERVENTION: the exercise intervention followed ACOG guidelines and included a 60 minutes general fitness class, with 40 minutes of endurance training/aerobic and 20 minutes of strength training and stretching/relaxation, performed at least twice per week for a minimum of 12 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: outcome measures were assessed through standardized interviews pre- and post-intervention (gestation week 36.6, ± 0.9), and included psychological variables related to quality of life, well-being, body image and pregnancy depression, as well as assessment of 13 commonly reported pregnancy complaints. FINDINGS: post-intervention, using intention to treat (ITT) analysis, women randomized to exercise rated their health significantly better compared to women in the control group (p=0.02) and reported less fatigue related to everyday activities (p=0.04). Women with complete exercise adherence (≥ 24 sessions) had significantly better scores on measurements of feelings related to sadness, hopelessness and anxiety (p<0.01), compared to the control group. Contradictory, the control group reported higher life enjoyment (p<0.01). There were no significant group differences in body-image or pregnancy depression. With respect to analysing pregnancy complaints according to ITT, no differences between the groups were found. A comparison of the women who attended ≥ 19 (80%, n=21) or ≥ 24 (100%, n=14) exercise sessions with the control-participants, showed that fewer women in the exercise group reported nausea/vomiting and numbness/poor circulation in legs. KEY CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION FOR PRACTISE: participation in regular group exercise during pregnancy contributed to improvements in some variables related to maternal well-being and quality of life. Women with high exercise adherence had significantly better results on several health variables reaping the highest benefits. A qualitative study exploring the barriers of women in achieving recommended amount of activity may be necessary to understand this population and developing better clinical practice educational tools.
Authors: Rita Santos-Rocha; Marta Fernandes de Carvalho; Joana Prior de Freitas; Jennifer Wegrzyk; Anna Szumilewicz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Rebeca de Castro; Raul Antunes; Diogo Mendes; Anna Szumilewicz; Rita Santos-Rocha Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-17 Impact factor: 4.614