AIM: Extended liver resection has increased during the last decades. However, hepatic hemodynamic changes after resection and the consequent complications like post hepatectomy liver failure are still a challenging issue. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the role of stepwise liver resection on hepatic hemodynamic changes. METHODS: To evaluate this effect we performed 25, 50, and 75 % sequential liver resections in 10 pigs. Before and after each resection, the hepatic artery flow and portal vein flow in relation to the remnant liver volume (RLV) as well as hepatic vascular pressures were measured and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Following sequential liver resection, the hepatic artery flow /100 g decreases and the portal vein flow increases up to 17 and 167 % following extended liver resection (75 %), respectively. Also, during stepwise liver resection, the portal vein pressure increases gradually up to 33 % following extended hepatectomy (75 %). CONCLUSION: Sequential decrease in the RLV decreases the hepatic artery flow /100 g and increases the portal vein flow /100 g and portal vein pressure. As the consequence, the liver goes under more poor-oxygenated blood supply and higher pressure. This may be one of the most important mechanisms of the post hepatectomy liver failure in case of extended liver resection.
AIM: Extended liver resection has increased during the last decades. However, hepatic hemodynamic changes after resection and the consequent complications like post hepatectomy liver failure are still a challenging issue. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the role of stepwise liver resection on hepatic hemodynamic changes. METHODS: To evaluate this effect we performed 25, 50, and 75 % sequential liver resections in 10 pigs. Before and after each resection, the hepatic artery flow and portal vein flow in relation to the remnant liver volume (RLV) as well as hepatic vascular pressures were measured and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Following sequential liver resection, the hepatic artery flow /100 g decreases and the portal vein flow increases up to 17 and 167 % following extended liver resection (75 %), respectively. Also, during stepwise liver resection, the portal vein pressure increases gradually up to 33 % following extended hepatectomy (75 %). CONCLUSION: Sequential decrease in the RLV decreases the hepatic artery flow /100 g and increases the portal vein flow /100 g and portal vein pressure. As the consequence, the liver goes under more poor-oxygenated blood supply and higher pressure. This may be one of the most important mechanisms of the post hepatectomy liver failure in case of extended liver resection.
Authors: A Nanashima; S Shibasaki; I Sakamoto; E Sueyoshi; Y Sumida; T Abo; T Nagasaki; T Sawai; T Yasutake; T Nagayasu Journal: Liver Int Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: M Kainuma; K Nakashima; I Sakuma; M Kawase; T Komatsu; Y Shimada; Y Nimura; T Nonami Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Rebecca A Schroeder; Carlos E Marroquin; Barbara Phillips Bute; Shukri Khuri; William G Henderson; Paul C Kuo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Mohammad Golriz; Maryam Ashrafi; Elias Khajeh; Ali Majlesara; Christa Flechtenmacher; Arianeb Mehrabi Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2017-08-29
Authors: Mohammad Golriz; Anastasia Lemekhova; Elias Khajeh; Omid Ghamarnejad; Mohammed Al-Saeedi; Oliver Strobel; Thilo Hackert; Beat Müller-Stich; Martin Schneider; Christoph Berchtold; Parham Tinoush; Philipp Mayer; De-Hua Chang; Karl Heinz Weiss; Katrin Hoffmann; Arianeb Mehrabi Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Hye-Sung Jo; Hae A Kim; Jong Cheol Lee; Kyung Chul Yoon; Young-In Yoon; Yoon Young Choi; Jin-I Seok; Myeong Hee Moon; Dong-Sik Kim Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2020-11
Authors: Ali Majlesara; Omid Ghamarnejad; Elias Khajeh; Mohammad Golriz; Negin Gharabaghi; Katrin Hoffmann; De-Hua Chang; Markus W Büchler; Arianeb Mehrabi Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 2.089