Literature DB >> 26573679

Ancestral and more recently acquired syntenic relationships of MADS-box genes uncovered by the Physcomitrella patens pseudochromosomal genome assembly.

Elizabeth I Barker1, Neil W Ashton2.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: The Physcomitrella pseudochromosomal genome assembly revealed previously invisible synteny enabling realisation of the full potential of shared synteny as a tool for probing evolution of this plant's MADS-box gene family. Assembly of the sequenced genome of Physcomitrella patens into 27 mega-scaffolds (pseudochromosomes) has confirmed the major predictions of our earlier model of expansion of the MADS-box gene family in the Physcomitrella lineage. Additionally, microsynteny has been conserved in the immediate vicinity of some recent duplicates of MADS-box genes. However, comparison of non-syntenic MIKC MADS-box genes and neighbouring genes indicates that chromosomal rearrangements and/or sequence degeneration have destroyed shared synteny over longer distances (macrosynteny) around MADS-box genes despite subsets comprising two or three MIKC genes having remained syntenic. In contrast, half of the type I MADS-box genes have been transposed creating new syntenic relations with MIKC genes. This implies that conservation of ancient ancestral synteny of MIKC genes and of more recently acquired synteny of type I and MIKC genes may be selectively advantageous. Our revised model predicts the birth rate of MIKC genes in Physcomitrella is higher than that of type I genes. However, this difference is attributable to an early tandem duplication and an early segmental duplication of MIKC genes prior to the two polyploidisations that account for most of the expansion of the MADS-box gene family in Physcomitrella. Furthermore, this early segmental duplication spawned two chromosomal lineages: one with a MIKC (C) gene, belonging to the PPM2 clade, in close proximity to one or a pair of MIKC* genes and another with a MIKC (C) gene, belonging to the PpMADS-S clade, characterised by greater separation from syntenic MIKC* genes. Our model has evolutionary implications for the Physcomitrella karyotype.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene duplication; Genome evolution; MADS-box genes; Physcomitrella; Polyploidisation; Synteny

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26573679     DOI: 10.1007/s00299-015-1898-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Rep        ISSN: 0721-7714            Impact factor:   4.570


  16 in total

Review 1.  Function and evolution of the plant MADS-box gene family.

Authors:  M Ng; M F Yanofsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition.

Authors:  Michael Freeling
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 26.379

3.  Many or most genes in Arabidopsis transposed after the origin of the order Brassicales.

Authors:  Michael Freeling; Eric Lyons; Brent Pedersen; Maqsudul Alam; Ray Ming; Damon Lisch
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  MADS goes genomic in conifers: towards determining the ancestral set of MADS-box genes in seed plants.

Authors:  Lydia Gramzow; Lisa Weilandt; Günter Theißen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Two ancient classes of MIKC-type MADS-box genes are present in the moss Physcomitrella patens.

Authors:  Katrin Henschel; Rumiko Kofuji; Mitsuyasu Hasebe; Heinz Saedler; Thomas Münster; Günter Theissen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Genome analysis of the moss Physcomitrella patens (Hedw.) B.S.G.

Authors:  R Reski; M Faust; X H Wang; M Wehe; W O Abel
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1994-08-15

7.  Chromosomal mapping of the MADS-box multigene family in Zea mays reveals dispersed distribution of allelic genes as well as transposed copies.

Authors:  A Fischer; N Baum; H Saedler; G Theissen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-06-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  And then there were many: MADS goes genomic.

Authors:  Stefanie De Bodt; Jeroen Raes; Yves Van de Peer; Günter Theissen
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 18.313

9.  Selaginella Genome Analysis - Entering the "Homoplasy Heaven" of the MADS World.

Authors:  Lydia Gramzow; Elizabeth Barker; Christian Schulz; Barbara Ambrose; Neil Ashton; Günter Theißen; Amy Litt
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Genome-wide expression analysis of soybean MADS genes showing potential function in the seed development.

Authors:  Cheng-Ming Fan; Xu Wang; Yan-Wei Wang; Rui-Bo Hu; Xiao-Mei Zhang; Jian-Xin Chen; Yong-Fu Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Survey of MIKC Type MADS-Box Genes in Non-seed Plants: Algae, Bryophytes, Lycophytes and Ferns.

Authors:  Gokilavani Thangavel; Saraswati Nayar
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.753

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.