Wei Li1, Zhongyun Liu2, Chengxia Li1, Ning Li1, Lei Fang3, Jin Chang3, Jian Tan4. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Anshan Road 154, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, People's Republic of China. 2. Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, 264003, Shandong, People's Republic of China. 3. Institute of Nanobiotechnology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Composites and Functional Materials, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Anshan Road 154, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, People's Republic of China. tanpost@163.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted nanoparticles can be used to deliver a therapeutic and imaging agent to EGFR-overexpressing tumor cells. (131)I-labeled anti-EGFR nanoparticles derived from cetuximab were used as a tumor-targeting vehicle in radionuclide therapy. METHODS: This paper describes the construction of the anti-EGFR nanoparticle EGFR-BSA-PCL. This nanoparticle was characterized for EGFR-targeted binding and cellular uptake in EGFR-overexpressing cancer cells by using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Anti-EGFR and non-targeted nanoparticles were labeled with (131)I using the chloramine-T method. Analyses of cytotoxicity and targeted cell killing with (131)I were performed using the MTT assay. The time-dependent cellular uptake of (131)I-labeled anti-EGFR nanoparticles proved the slow-release effects of nanoparticles. A radioiodine therapy study was also performed in mice. RESULTS: The EGFR-targeted nanoparticle EGFR-BSA-PCL and the non-targeted nanoparticle BSA-PCL were constructed; the effective diameters were approximately 100 nm. The results from flow cytometry and confocal microscopy revealed significant uptake of EGFR-BSA-PCL in EGFR-overexpressing tumor cells. Compared with EGFR-BSA-PCL, BSA-PCL could also bind to cells, but tumor cell retention was minimal and weak. In MTT assays, the EGFR-targeted radioactive nanoparticle (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL showed greater cytotoxicity and targeted cell killing than the non-targeted nanoparticle (131)I-BSA-PCL. The radioiodine uptake of both (131)I-labeled nanoparticles, (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL and (131)I-BSA-PCL, was rapid and reached maximal levels 4 h after incubation, but the (131)I uptake of (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL was higher than that of (131)I-BSA-PCL. On day 15, the average tumor volumes of the (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL and (131)I-BSA-PCL groups showed a slow growth relationship compared with that of the control group. CONCLUSION: The EGFR-targeted nanoparticle EGFR-BSA-PCL demonstrated superior cellular binding and uptake compared with those of the control BSA-PCL. The EGFR-targeted radioactive nanoparticle (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL exhibited favorable intracellular retention of (131)I. Radionuclide therapy using (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL, which showed excellent targeted cell killing, suppressed cancer cell growth caused by EGFR overexpression.
INTRODUCTION:Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted nanoparticles can be used to deliver a therapeutic and imaging agent to EGFR-overexpressing tumor cells. (131)I-labeled anti-EGFR nanoparticles derived from cetuximab were used as a tumor-targeting vehicle in radionuclide therapy. METHODS: This paper describes the construction of the anti-EGFR nanoparticle EGFR-BSA-PCL. This nanoparticle was characterized for EGFR-targeted binding and cellular uptake in EGFR-overexpressing cancer cells by using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Anti-EGFR and non-targeted nanoparticles were labeled with (131)I using the chloramine-T method. Analyses of cytotoxicity and targeted cell killing with (131)I were performed using the MTT assay. The time-dependent cellular uptake of (131)I-labeled anti-EGFR nanoparticles proved the slow-release effects of nanoparticles. A radioiodine therapy study was also performed in mice. RESULTS: The EGFR-targeted nanoparticle EGFR-BSA-PCL and the non-targeted nanoparticle BSA-PCL were constructed; the effective diameters were approximately 100 nm. The results from flow cytometry and confocal microscopy revealed significant uptake of EGFR-BSA-PCL in EGFR-overexpressing tumor cells. Compared with EGFR-BSA-PCL, BSA-PCL could also bind to cells, but tumor cell retention was minimal and weak. In MTT assays, the EGFR-targeted radioactive nanoparticle (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL showed greater cytotoxicity and targeted cell killing than the non-targeted nanoparticle (131)I-BSA-PCL. The radioiodine uptake of both (131)I-labeled nanoparticles, (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL and (131)I-BSA-PCL, was rapid and reached maximal levels 4 h after incubation, but the (131)I uptake of (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL was higher than that of (131)I-BSA-PCL. On day 15, the average tumor volumes of the (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL and (131)I-BSA-PCL groups showed a slow growth relationship compared with that of the control group. CONCLUSION: The EGFR-targeted nanoparticle EGFR-BSA-PCL demonstrated superior cellular binding and uptake compared with those of the control BSA-PCL. The EGFR-targeted radioactive nanoparticle (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL exhibited favorable intracellular retention of (131)I. Radionuclide therapy using (131)I-EGFR-BSA-PCL, which showed excellent targeted cell killing, suppressed cancer cell growth caused by EGFR overexpression.
Authors: Christoph Mamot; Daryl C Drummond; Charles O Noble; Verena Kallab; Zexiong Guo; Keelung Hong; Dmitri B Kirpotin; John W Park Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Charles Preston Neff; Jiehua Zhou; Leila Remling; Jes Kuruvilla; Jane Zhang; Haitang Li; David D Smith; Piotr Swiderski; John J Rossi; Ramesh Akkina Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Ahmad Fawzi Hussain; Harald Rune Krüger; Florian Kampmeier; Tim Weissbach; Kai Licha; Felix Kratz; Rainer Haag; Marcelo Calderón; Stefan Barth Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Michael R McDevitt; Debjit Chattopadhyay; Barry J Kappel; Jaspreet Singh Jaggi; Scott R Schiffman; Christophe Antczak; Jon T Njardarson; Renier Brentjens; David A Scheinberg Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Mengshi Li; Xiuli Zhang; Thomas P Quinn; Dongyoul Lee; Dijie Liu; Falk Kunkel; Brian E Zimmerman; Daniel McAlister; Keith Olewein; Yusuf Menda; Saed Mirzadeh; Roy Copping; Frances L Johnson; Michael K Schultz Journal: Appl Radiat Isot Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 1.513