| Literature DB >> 26573054 |
Vivek Tiwari1, Shah Alam Khan2, Ashok Kumar3, Rishiram Poudel4, Venkatesan Sampath Kumar5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Tuberculosis of the hip joint is a significant cause of preventable disability, especially in children. The aim of our study was to evaluate the functional results of hip arthroscopy done in a cohort of patients with hip joint tuberculosis and to compare them with the outcome of conservatively managed cases.Entities:
Keywords: Hip arthroscopy; Hip joint; Modified Harris hip score; Painful hip; Tuberculosis
Year: 2015 PMID: 26573054 PMCID: PMC4661146 DOI: 10.1007/s11832-015-0705-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Clinico-radiological grading of tuberculosis of the hip
| Stage | Features | Deformity | Limb length |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Stage of synovitis | Flexion, abduction, external rotation | Apparent lengthening |
| Stage 2 | Stage of early arthritis | Flexion, adduction, internal rotation | Apparent shortening |
| Stage 3 | Stage of late arthritis | Flexion, adduction, internal rotation | True shortening |
| Stage 4 | Stage of destruction | Flexion, adduction, internal rotation | Gross true shortening |
Modified Harris hip score (MHHS)
| Points | Description |
|---|---|
|
| |
| 44 | None/ignores |
| 40 | Slight, occasional, no compromise in activity |
| 30 | Mild, no effect on ordinary activity, pain after activity, uses aspirin |
| 20 | Moderate, tolerable, makes concessions, occasional codeine |
| 10 | Marked, serious limitations |
| 0 | Totally disabled |
|
| |
| Limp | |
| 11 | None |
| 8 | Slight |
| 5 | Moderate |
| 0 | Severe |
| 0 | Unable to walk |
| Support | |
| 11 | None |
| 7 | Cane, long walks |
| 5 | Cane, full time |
| 4 | Crutch |
| 2 | 2 canes |
| 0 | 2 crutches |
| 0 | Unable to walk |
| Distance walked | |
| 11 | Unlimited |
| 8 | 6 blocks |
| 5 | 2–3 blocks |
| 2 | Indoors only |
| 2 | Bed and chair |
|
| |
| Stairs | |
| 4 | Normally |
| 2 | Normally with banister |
| 1 | Any method |
| 0 | Not able |
| Socks/shoes | |
| 4 | With ease |
| 2 | With difficulty |
| 0 | Unable |
| Sitting | |
| 5 | Any chair, 1 h |
| 3 | High chair, 0.5 h |
| 0 | Unable to sit, 0.5 h, any chair |
| Public transportation | |
| 1 | Able to enter public transportation |
| 0 | Unable to use public transportation |
The Harris hip score includes 91 points for pain and function and 9 points for range of motion and deformity. The range of motion and deformity portion has been omitted. The multiplier 1.1 is used to give a total possible score of 100: total score = total points × 1.1
Fig. 1Plain radiograph of the pelvis with both hips of a 10-year-old with right side hip joint tuberculosis (clinico-radiological stage 2), which was treated with arthroscopic debridement
Fig. 2Arthroscopic picture showing pannus formation over the acetabular fossa in tuberculosis of the hip joint in an 11-year-old child (arthroscopic stage I)
Fig. 3Arthroscopic image depicting intense synovitis in an 11-year-old with tuberculosis of the hip joint (arthroscopic stage I)
Fig. 4Arthroscopic picture showing hyperaemia and pannus formation on the floor of the acetabulum with non-visualisation of the labrum in a 10-year-old with tuberculosis of the hip joint (arthroscopic stage II)
Fig. 5Another arthroscopic photograph depicting extensive destruction with cartilage erosion in tuberculosis of the hip joint in an 11-year-old boy (arthroscopic stage III)
Mean MHHS according to the different clinico-pathological grades of the disease
| Stage of the disease | Operative/control group | Mean pre-operative/pre-treatment MHHS | Mean post-operative/post-treatment MHHS | Mean difference in MHHS |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Operative | 65.91 | 84.10 | 18.18 | <0.001 |
| Control | 64.75 | 74.50 | 9.75 | <0.001 | |
| Stage 2 | Operative | 55.71 | 74.29 | 18.57 | <0.001 |
| Control | 50.58 | 66.17 | 15.59 | <0.001 | |
| Stage 3 | Operative | 43.75 | 61.25 | 17.5 | <0.001 |
| Control | 45.0 | 57.14 | 12.14 | <0.001 |
Demographic profile of patients in the operative group along with outcome data
| S. no. | Age (years)/gender | Pre-operative stage (clinico-radiological classification) | Pre-operative MHHS | Post-operative MHHS | Difference between pre- and post-operative MHHS | Follow-up period (months) | Arthroscopic stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11/M | 1 | 55 | 85 | 30 | 41 | I |
| 2 | 11/M | 1 | 60 | 75 | 15 | 43 | I |
| 3 | 12/M | 2 | 55 | 70 | 15 | 47 | I |
| 4 | 12/M | 1 | 70 | 85 | 15 | 46 | II |
| 5 | 8/M | 2 | 55 | 80 | 25 | 44 | I |
| 6 | 9/M | 2 | 50 | 75 | 25 | 46 | II |
| 7 | 11/F | 1 | 65 | 90 | 25 | 52 | I |
| 8 | 12/F | 1 | 70 | 75 | 5 | 57 | II |
| 9 | 7/M | 1 | 65 | 90 | 25 | 42 | I |
| 10 | 6/M | 2 | 45 | 65 | 20 | 40 | II |
| 11 | 9/F | 3 | 40 | 55 | 15 | 43 | II |
| 12 | 11/F | 1 | 65 | 90 | 25 | 43 | II |
| 13 | 11/M | 3 | 40 | 60 | 20 | 44 | III |
| 14 | 12/F | 1 | 70 | 85 | 15 | 43 | II |
| 15 | 8/M | 1 | 65 | 80 | 15 | 50 | I |
| 16 | 10/M | 2 | 60 | 80 | 20 | 49 | II |
| 17 | 12/M | 3 | 50 | 55 | 5 | 42 | II |
| 18 | 12/M | 1 | 70 | 90 | 20 | 43 | I |
| 19 | 11/M | 2 | 65 | 85 | 20 | 58 | I |
| 20 | 10/F | 1 | 70 | 80 | 10 | 44 | II |
| 21 | 10/F | 2 | 60 | 65 | 5 | 42 | III |
| 22 | 9/F | 3 | 45 | 75 | 30 | 36 | I |
Demographic profile of patients in the control group along with outcome data
| S. no. | Age (years)/gender | Stage (clinico-radiological classification) | Pre-treatment MHHS | Post-treatment MHHS | Difference between pre- and post-treatment MHHS | Follow-up period (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12/F | 1 | 60 | 70 | 10 | 40 |
| 2 | 10/M | 2 | 55 | 65 | 10 | 50 |
| 3 | 10/M | 1 | 65 | 70 | 5 | 53 |
| 4 | 7/F | 1 | 60 | 65 | 5 | 52 |
| 5 | 6/M | 3 | 45 | 55 | 10 | 51 |
| 6 | 6/M | 2 | 50 | 60 | 10 | 37 |
| 7 | 8/M | 3 | 40 | 50 | 10 | 38 |
| 8 | 12/F | 1 | 65 | 75 | 10 | 39 |
| 9 | 11/M | 2 | 55 | 70 | 15 | 36 |
| 10 | 11/F | 2 | 60 | 75 | 15 | 43 |
| 11 | 9/F | 1 | 65 | 70 | 5 | 48 |
| 12 | 8/M | 2 | 50 | 60 | 10 | 54 |
| 13 | 11/M | 1 | 65 | 80 | 15 | 48 |
| 14 | 12/F | 1 | 65 | 70 | 5 | 58 |
| 15 | 8/M | 1 | 60 | 80 | 20 | 59 |
| 16 | 11/M | 1 | 70 | 75 | 5 | 49 |
| 17 | 12/M | 2 | 55 | 65 | 10 | 55 |
| 18 | 12/M | 1 | 60 | 75 | 15 | 43 |
| 19 | 8/F | 2 | 60 | 65 | 5 | 36 |
| 20 | 9/M | 1 | 70 | 80 | 10 | 42 |
| 21 | 10/M | 3 | 50 | 60 | 10 | 48 |
| 22 | 7/M | 1 | 65 | 75 | 10 | 57 |
| 23 | 11/M | 2 | 55 | 65 | 10 | 44 |
| 24 | 10/F | 2 | 60 | 75 | 15 | 47 |
| 25 | 12/M | 1 | 65 | 80 | 15 | 49 |
| 26 | 11/M | 1 | 65 | 70 | 5 | 58 |
| 27 | 9/F | 2 | 60 | 65 | 5 | 54 |
| 28 | 11/M | 1 | 70 | 80 | 10 | 41 |
| 29 | 9/M | 3 | 45 | 50 | 5 | 40 |
| 30 | 12/M | 3 | 40 | 60 | 20 | 54 |
| 31 | 10/M | 2 | 65 | 70 | 5 | 44 |
| 32 | 11/M | 1 | 65 | 70 | 5 | 46 |
| 33 | 9/M | 1 | 65 | 75 | 10 | 50 |
| 34 | 12/F | 2 | 55 | 65 | 10 | 47 |
| 35 | 11/M | 2 | 50 | 60 | 10 | 44 |
| 36 | 12/M | 3 | 45 | 60 | 15 | 41 |
| 37 | 9/M | 1 | 65 | 70 | 5 | 48 |
| 38 | 12/F | 2 | 55 | 65 | 10 | 44 |
| 39 | 11/F | 2 | 60 | 70 | 10 | 42 |
| 40 | 10/M | 2 | 50 | 60 | 10 | 38 |
| 41 | 11/F | 1 | 65 | 80 | 15 | 37 |
| 42 | 12/M | 3 | 50 | 65 | 15 | 45 |
| 43 | 12/M | 2 | 55 | 70 | 15 | 48 |
| 44 | 11/F | 1 | 65 | 80 | 15 | 55 |
Median MHHS according to the different arthroscopic grades of the disease
| Grade of the disease | Median pre-operative MHHS | Median post-operative MHHS | Median difference in MHHS |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 62.5 | 82.5 | 20 | <0.001 |
| Grade 2 | 62.5 | 77.5 | 15 | <0.001 |
| Grade 3 | 50 | 62.5 | 12.5 | <0.001 |