Literature DB >> 26572754

The Role of Ki-67 and Pre-cytoreduction Parameters in Selecting Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma (DMPM) Patients for Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Shigeki Kusamura1, Pilar Adriana Torres Mesa1,2, Antonello Cabras3, Dario Baratti1, Marcello Deraco4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a prognostic analysis of preoperative parameters and Ki-67 determination to develop selection criteria for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC in patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM).
METHODS: DMPM patients treated with CRS and HIPEC at NCI of Milan participated in this study. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazard model and conditional inference tree method to select independent predictors of overall survival (OS) from the followings pre-cytoreduction parameters: age, sex, ECOG performance status, Charlson comorbidity index, previous systemic chemotherapy, CA-125, histological subtype (epithelioid vs. biphasic/sarcomatoid), Ki-67 (determined with immunohistochemistry), and peritoneal cancer index (PCI).
RESULTS: A total of 117 patients (male/female: 67/50) with median age of 60.5 (range 22-75) years were included. Eighty-three patients had ECOG performance status = 0, median Charlson comorbidity index was 4 (range 2-9), and 102 cases had epithelioid subtype. Median Ki-67 was 5 % (range 1-60). Ninety-four (80.3 %) cases were optimally cytoreduced. The Cox analysis identified Ki-67, PCI, and histological subtype as independent prognosticators of OS. Conditional inference tree method identified three prognostic subsets: (I) Ki-67 ≤ 9 %; (II) Ki-67 > 9 % and PCI ≤ 17; and (III) Ki-67 > 9 % and PCI > 17. The median OS for subsets I, II, and III were, 86.6, 63.2, and 10.3 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 is a powerful prognosticator that allows, along with PCI, and histological subtype, a good prediction of OS in patients with DMPM. Patients with Ki-67 > 9 % and PCI > 17 are unlikely to benefit from the procedure and should be considered for other treatment protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26572754     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4962-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  12 in total

Review 1.  Clinical presentation, diagnosis, classification and management of peritoneal mesothelioma: a review.

Authors:  Alfonso García-Fadrique; Akash Mehta; Faheez Mohamed; Sanjeev Dayal; Tom Cecil; Brendan J Moran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10

2.  Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: prognostic significance of clinical and pathologic parameters and validation of a nuclear-grading system in a multi-institutional series of 225 cases.

Authors:  David B Chapel; Jefree J Schulte; Gudrun Absenger; Richard Attanoos; Luka Brcic; Kelly J Butnor; Lucian Chirieac; Andrew Churg; Françoise Galateau-Sallé; Kenzo Hiroshima; Yin P Hung; Hedy Kindler; Thomas Krausz; Alberto Marchevsky; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Jeffrey Mueller; Kazuki Nabeshima; Kirin Turaga; Ann E Walts; Aliya N Husain
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  PCI is Not Predictive of Survival After Complete CRS/HIPEC in Peritoneal Dissemination from High-Grade Appendiceal Primaries.

Authors:  Konstantinos Ioannis Votanopoulos; David Bartlett; Brendan Moran; Choudry M Haroon; Greg Russell; James F Pingpank; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Chandrakumaran Kandiah; Konstantinos Chouliaras; Perry Shen; Edward A Levine
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  New insights in the pathology of peritoneal surface malignancy.

Authors:  Norman John Carr
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

Review 5.  Primary and metastatic peritoneal surface malignancies.

Authors:  Delia Cortés-Guiral; Martin Hübner; Mohammad Alyami; Aditi Bhatt; Wim Ceelen; Olivier Glehen; Florian Lordick; Robert Ramsay; Olivia Sgarbura; Kurt Van Der Speeten; Kiran K Turaga; Manish Chand
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 52.329

6.  Prognostic factors of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a retrospective study of 52 female patients.

Authors:  Jianting Ma; Shengzhi Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.253

Review 7.  Essentials for Pathological Evaluation of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies and Synoptic Reporting of Cytoreductive Surgery Specimens-A review and evidence-based guide.

Authors:  Aditi Bhatt; Suniti Mishra; Loma Parikh; Sandeep Sheth; Imran Gorur
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-19

8.  Clinical and surgical outcomes of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma discussed at a monthly national multidisciplinary team video-conference meeting.

Authors:  A Brandl; S Westbrook; S Nunn; E Arbuthnot-Smith; J Mulsow; H Youssef; N Carr; A Tzivanakis; S Dayal; F Mohamed; B J Moran; T Cecil
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-01-30

9.  Evaluation of prognostic histological parameters proposed for pleural mesothelioma in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. A short report.

Authors:  Federica Pezzuto; Luigi Vimercati; Francesco Fortarezza; Andrea Marzullo; Antonio Pennella; Domenica Cavone; Alessandra Punzi; Concetta Caporusso; Antonio d'Amati; Teresa Lettini; Gabriella Serio
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 10.  Peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Alissa Greenbaum; H Richard Alexander
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.