F Delva1, P Andujar2, A Lacourt3, P Brochard4, J-C Pairon2. 1. Institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Institut de santé publique d'épidémiologie et de développement (ISPED), université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux cedex, France; Unité Inserm 897, université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: fleur.delva@isped.u-bordeaux2.fr. 2. Service de pneumologie et pathologie professionnelle, centre hospitalier intercommunal de Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France; Département hospitalo-universitaire A-TVB, unité Inserm 955, 94000 Créteil, France; Institut santé travail Paris-Est, université Paris-Est, 94000 Créteil, France. 3. Institut de santé publique d'épidémiologie et de développement (ISPED), université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux cedex, France; Unité Inserm 897, université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France. 4. Institut de santé publique d'épidémiologie et de développement (ISPED), université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33000 Bordeaux cedex, France; Unité Inserm 897, université de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Service de médecine du travail, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to review the literature regarding the dose-response relationship between occupational exposure to chemicals classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as carcinogenic agents and the risk of some lung cancers and on any combined effect with tobacco exposure on lung cancer risk. METHODS: A literature search was performed in three databases as well as in the IARC monographs between January 1990 and April 2015. RESULTS: The literature is abundant for some carcinogens such as asbestos, crystalline silica and diesel exhaust fumes but is more sparse for many carcinogens and particularly any interaction with tobacco on lung cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Few data exist for most lung occupational carcinogens including their interaction with tobacco exposure. In the case of exposure to occupational carcinogens and co-exposure to tobacco smoke, there is a dual primary prevention objective: the elimination of both occupational risk factors and tobacco smoke.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to review the literature regarding the dose-response relationship between occupational exposure to chemicals classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as carcinogenic agents and the risk of some lung cancers and on any combined effect with tobacco exposure on lung cancer risk. METHODS: A literature search was performed in three databases as well as in the IARC monographs between January 1990 and April 2015. RESULTS: The literature is abundant for some carcinogens such as asbestos, crystalline silica and diesel exhaust fumes but is more sparse for many carcinogens and particularly any interaction with tobacco on lung cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Few data exist for most lung occupational carcinogens including their interaction with tobacco exposure. In the case of exposure to occupational carcinogens and co-exposure to tobacco smoke, there is a dual primary prevention objective: the elimination of both occupational risk factors and tobacco smoke.
Authors: Olivia Pérol; Barbara Charbotel; Lionel Perrier; Sandrine Bonnand; Elodie Belladame; Virginie Avrillon; Paul Rebattu; Frédéric Gomez; Géraldine Lauridant; Maurice Pérol; Beatrice Fervers Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Claire R Pestak; Tawny W Boyce; Orrin B Myers; L Olivia Hopkins'; Charles L Wiggins; Bruce R Wissore; Akshay Sood; Linda S Cook Journal: Southwest J Pulm Crit Care Date: 2021-08-13