Masita Fujiko1, Maisuri T Chalid1, Susan I Ie2, Ridha Wahyuni1, Martono Roni2, Ilhamjaya Patellongi1, M Nasrum Massi1, David H Muljono3. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. 2. Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jl. Diponegoro 69, Jakarta Pusat 10430, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia. 3. Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia; Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jl. Diponegoro 69, Jakarta Pusat 10430, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: davidhm@eijkman.go.id.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: New cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continue to occur worldwide. Most of these are due to mother-to-child transmission (MTCT), with maternal viraemia as the most important contributing factor. The hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level, which correlates positively with viral load, has been used for treatment monitoring in chronic hepatitis B. This study evaluated the usefulness of quantitative HBsAg for viral load prediction in HBsAg-positive pregnant women. METHODS: A total of 943 pregnant women in Makassar, Indonesia, were screened for HBsAg. Sixty-four women were HBsAg-positive and investigated. HBsAg level and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)/hepatitis B e antibody (anti-HBe) status were determined serologically. Viral load was measured by real-time PCR. HBV DNA was sequenced and analysed for identification of genotype and basal core promoter (BCP)/precore (PC) mutations. RESULTS: Of 64 subjects, 12 (18.8%) were HBeAg-positive and 52 (81.3%) were HBeAg-negative. HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were significantly higher in the HBeAg-positive group (p<0.001). HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were positively correlated in the HBeAg-positive group (r = 0.659; p=0.02), but not in the HBeAg-negative group (r=0.194; p=0.168). Low HBsAg levels (<3.0 log10 IU/ml) corresponded with HBV DNA levels<6.0 log10 IU/ml (r=0.404; p=0.001), a recognized threshold for MTCT. Genotype C was more prevalent than genotype B, but not associated with HBsAg level, viral load, or HBeAg status. Two-thirds of HBeAg-negative subjects with high HBV DNA levels harboured BCP (A1762T/G1764A) and/or PC (G1896A) variants. CONCLUSIONS: HBsAg levels provide a good viral load predictor in HBeAg-positive but not HBeAg-negative pregnant women. The HBeAg-negative group had a frequent occurrence of BCP/PC variants, which may have contributed to the lack of correlation observed. Samples with a low HBsAg level, which is associated with a low risk of MTCT, do not require HBV DNA measurement.
BACKGROUND: New cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection continue to occur worldwide. Most of these are due to mother-to-child transmission (MTCT), with maternal viraemia as the most important contributing factor. The hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level, which correlates positively with viral load, has been used for treatment monitoring in chronic hepatitis B. This study evaluated the usefulness of quantitative HBsAg for viral load prediction in HBsAg-positive pregnant women. METHODS: A total of 943 pregnant women in Makassar, Indonesia, were screened for HBsAg. Sixty-four women were HBsAg-positive and investigated. HBsAg level and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)/hepatitis B e antibody (anti-HBe) status were determined serologically. Viral load was measured by real-time PCR. HBV DNA was sequenced and analysed for identification of genotype and basal core promoter (BCP)/precore (PC) mutations. RESULTS: Of 64 subjects, 12 (18.8%) were HBeAg-positive and 52 (81.3%) were HBeAg-negative. HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were significantly higher in the HBeAg-positive group (p<0.001). HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were positively correlated in the HBeAg-positive group (r = 0.659; p=0.02), but not in the HBeAg-negative group (r=0.194; p=0.168). Low HBsAg levels (<3.0 log10 IU/ml) corresponded with HBV DNA levels<6.0 log10 IU/ml (r=0.404; p=0.001), a recognized threshold for MTCT. Genotype C was more prevalent than genotype B, but not associated with HBsAg level, viral load, or HBeAg status. Two-thirds of HBeAg-negative subjects with high HBV DNA levels harboured BCP (A1762T/G1764A) and/or PC (G1896A) variants. CONCLUSIONS: HBsAg levels provide a good viral load predictor in HBeAg-positive but not HBeAg-negative pregnant women. The HBeAg-negative group had a frequent occurrence of BCP/PC variants, which may have contributed to the lack of correlation observed. Samples with a low HBsAg level, which is associated with a low risk of MTCT, do not require HBV DNA measurement.
Authors: Jodie Dionne-Odom; Gabriella D Cozzi; Ricardo A Franco; Basile Njei; Alan T N Tita Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-09-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Clara Van Ommen; Arianne Albert; Melica Nourmoussavi; Reka Gustafson; Elizabeth Brodkin; Martin Petric; Mel Krajden; Jane A Buxton; Mark Bigham; Neora Pick; Richard A Schreiber; Christopher H Sherlock; Deborah Money; Eric M Yoshida; Julianne van Schalkwyk Journal: Can Liver J Date: 2019-12-10
Authors: Dolvy Girawan; Raden T D Judistiani; Nelly A Risan; Muhammad B Bestari; Eka S Nugraha; Yudith S Ermaya; Dwi Prasetyo Journal: Int J Hepatol Date: 2020-10-19
Authors: Hartono Gunardi; Melanie Y Iskandar; Susan I Ie; Pramita G Dwipoerwantoro; Rino A Gani; David H Muljono Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 6.047