Literature DB >> 26571049

Are Locked Plates Needed for Split Depression Tibial Plateau Fractures?

Michelle Abghari1, Alejandro Marcano1, Roy Davidovitch1, Sanjit R Konda1, Kenneth A Egol1.   

Abstract

Displaced tibial plateau fractures often require surgical treatment and plate and screw constructs are the most common method of fixation. There has been increased usage of locking plate technology for both complex and simple fracture patterns without any evidence demonstrating their advantage. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical use of locked versus nonlocked plating for repair of displaced Schatzker type-II (OTA Type 41B) tibial plateau fractures. Seventy-seven consecutive patients treated operatively with one of two types of plate and screw constructs in a nonrandomized fashion for Schatzker type II tibial plateau fractures and they were prospectively followed over a 5-year period. A total of 35 (45.5%) patients were treated using a locked plate and screw construct and 42 (54.5%) patients were treated with a nonlocked plate and screw construct. All patients received the same pre- and postoperative care and there was no difference in plate morphology and length between cohorts. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) scores, Visual Analogue Score for pain, and knee ranges of motion. Radiographic outcome was assessed with plain radiographs at all follow-up points. Implant costs for both types of constructs were calculated from hospital purchasing records. Patients were assessed at a mean period of 18.5 months (range: 12-72 months). There was no difference in demographic factors, physical examination parameters, radiographic outcomes, and SMFA scores between cohorts. In terms of cost, the cost of locked construct was $905 more than the nonlocked construct. Based on clinical outcomes and cost per implant, we found no evidence to support the routine use of locked plating for simple split depression fractures of the lateral tibial plateau. The use of standard nonlocked, precontoured implants provides adequate fixation for these fracture patterns. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26571049     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1567872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  4 in total

1.  Repair of Tibial Plateau Fracture (Schatzker II).

Authors:  Dylan T Lowe; Michael T Milone; Leah J Gonzalez; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-07-24

2.  Comparative Study of Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Fracture of the Tibial Plateau Operated with Locked or Conventional Plates.

Authors:  Bruno Gonçalves Schröder E Souza; Thiago Avelino Leite; Tarsis Aparecido Bueno da Silva; Carlos Otavio Fabiano de Faria Candido; Felipe Freesz de Almeida; Valdeci Manoel de Oliveira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-03-01

3.  Prevalence of Deep Surgical Site Infection After Repair of Periarticular Knee Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Grayson R Norris; Jake X Checketts; Jared T Scott; Matt Vassar; Brent L Norris; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-08-02

4.  Radiological Outcome Measures Indicate Advantages of Precontoured Locking Compression Plates in Elderly Patients With Split-Depression Fractures to the Lateral Tibial Plateau (AO41B3).

Authors:  Wolf C Prall; Thomas Kusmenkov; Maximilian Rieger; Florian Haasters; Hermann O Mayr; Wolfgang Böcker; Julian Fürmetz
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-10-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.