Literature DB >> 2657055

Captopril versus perindopril: a double blind study in essential hypertension.

K R Lees1, J L Reid, M G Scott, J Hosie, D Herpin, J P Santoni.   

Abstract

This was a double blind, parallel group, multicentre comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and acceptability of perindopril and captopril in essential hypertension. After one month of placebo, 165 patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 125 mmHg were randomised to perindopril 4 mg once daily or captopril 25 mg twice daily orally. The perindopril group (n = 82) had significantly higher pretreatment DBP (105.4 +/- 0.8 mmHg vs 102.3 +/- 0.6 mmHg) but other demographic variables were similar. Assessment was monthly for three months: 'uncontrolled' patients (DBP greater than 90 mmHg) had the dose doubled and then hydrochlorothiazide added. Two of the six withdrawals were attributed to drug side effects and were in the captopril group. There was no significant difference in the number of withdrawals or incidence of side effects between the drugs. The final titrated treatments were similar and monotherapy normalised DBP in 49% of each group. The final 'control' rate was higher with perindopril than captopril: 75% vs 57%, P = 0.016. The overall fall in DBP was greater in the perindopril group: 26.5 +/- 1.9 mmHg vs 18.9 +/- 1.9 mmHg, P = 0.005. The doses of diuretic were similar in the two groups. The DBP of patients who received only monotherapy for three months also fell more in the perindopril group (-17.5 +/- 1.4 mmHg vs -13.9 +/- 1.0 mmHg, P less than 0.01). At the doses studied, perindopril was more effective than captopril in lowering DBP, either as monotherapy or in combination with a diuretic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2657055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  8 in total

1.  The effect of perindopril and hydrochlorothiazide alone and in combination on blood pressure and on the renin-angiotensin system in hypertensive subjects.

Authors:  C L Brown; C I Backhouse; J C Grippat; J P Santoni
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Humoral effects of perindopril in essential hypertension.

Authors:  G A Sagnella; N D Markandu; D R Singer; M G Buckley; M A Miller; G A MacGregor
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Perindopril. A review of its pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology.

Authors:  R J Macfadyen; K R Lees; J L Reid
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Clinical acceptability of ACE inhibitor therapy in mild to moderate hypertension, a comparison between perindopril and enalapril.

Authors:  L Alcocer; C Campos; J H Bahena; A Nacaud; J Parra Carillo; C Calvo; C Weber; G Lerebours; L Mickalonis; M T Villahermosa
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.727

5.  A double-blind randomised comparison of perindopril and ketanserin in the treatment of hypertension in elderly diabetic patients.

Authors:  J Woo; K S Woo; K H Or; C S Cockram; M G Nicholls
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Perindopril: an updated review of its use in hypertension.

Authors:  M Hurst; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Perindopril. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  P A Todd; A Fitton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Choosing the right ACE inhibitor. A guide to selection.

Authors:  G Leonetti; C Cuspidi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.546

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.