Literature DB >> 26569088

Radiation safety and ergonomics in the electrophysiology laboratory: update on recent advances.

Girish M Nair1, Pablo B Nery, Calum J Redpath, Mouhannad M Sadek, David H Birnie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Risks associated with exposure to ionizing radiation in patients undergoing electrophysiology procedures and interventional cardiac electrophysiologists performing these procedures are a serious concern. Strategies to reduce radiation exposure are of obvious importance. In addition, interventional cardiac electrophysiologists have to perform procedures wearing heavy lead protection for prolonged periods, making them prone to cervical and lumbar spinal injuries. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recently developed technologies, such as low-exposure radiographic imaging, novel radiographic imaging protection systems, nonfluoroscopic mapping systems using image integration, and remote catheter manipulation systems have been successful in reducing ionizing radiation exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory. The efficacy and safety of these technologies are being evaluated in clinical trials. In addition, economic analyses are being performed to evaluate these novel systems. The use of nonweight-bearing radiation protection devices and ergonomic design of the electrophysiology laboratory aim to reduce the incidence of occupational injuries in interventional cardiac electrophysiologists.
SUMMARY: There is need for ongoing development and evaluation of new technologies to minimize exposure to ionizing radiation during electrophysiologic procedures. In addition, ergonomic planning of the electrophysiology laboratory and training of interventional cardiac electrophysiologists are crucial to occupational injury prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26569088     DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol        ISSN: 0268-4705            Impact factor:   2.161


  5 in total

1.  Contactless Electrocatheter Tracing within Human Body via Magnetic Sensing: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Emilio Andreozzi; Daniele Esposito; Paolo Bifulco
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Lesion Assessment in the Electrophysiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Timothy M Markman; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-11

Review 3.  Contrast - in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nirav Patel; Pavani Kolakalapudi; Garima Arora
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 4.  Zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation of severe drug-resistant arrhythmia guided by Ensite NavX system during pregnancy: Two case reports and literature review.

Authors:  Guangzhi Chen; Ge Sun; Renfan Xu; Xiaomei Chen; Li Yang; Yang Bai; Shanshan Yang; Ping Guo; Yan Zhang; Chunxia Zhao; Dao Wen Wang; Yan Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Feasibility study for echocardiography-guided lead insertion for permanent cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Omolade O Sogade; Rieta N Aben; Harry Eyituoyo; Nkechi C Arinze; Felix O Sogade
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 1.976

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.