| Literature DB >> 26568861 |
Somayeh Azarmi1, Zahra Farsi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Any defect in extremities of the body can affect different life aspects.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptation; Amputation; Lower Extremity; Model; Nursing; Veterans
Year: 2015 PMID: 26568861 PMCID: PMC4640056 DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.25810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Red Crescent Med J ISSN: 2074-1804 Impact factor: 0.611
Figure 1.The Study Process
Individuals’ Properties in the Intervention and Control Groups[a]
| Characteristics | Intervention Group | Control Group | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 48.37 ± 4.48 | 47.30 ± 10.92 | 0.62 [ |
|
| 0.50 [ | ||
| Male | 30 (50.8) | 29 (49.2) | - |
| Female | 0 (0) | 1 (100.0) | - |
|
| 80.33 ± 13.08 | 75.13 ± 9.97 | 0.08 [ |
|
| 0.15 [ | ||
| < High school diploma | 15 (48.4) | 16 (51.6) | - |
| Academic degree | 15 (51.7) | 14 (48.3) | - |
|
| 0.08 [ | ||
| Employed | 9 (50.0) | 9 (50.0) | - |
| Service retirement | 10 (50.0) | 10 (50.0) | - |
| Medical retirement | 9 (75.0) | 3 (25.0) | |
| Disabled | 2 (20.0) | 8 (80.0) | - |
|
| 0.66 [ | ||
| Married | 10 (45.5) | 12 (54.5) | |
| Single | 19 (51.4) | 18 (48.6) | |
|
| 0.55 [ | ||
| Married | 29 (50.9) | 28 (49.1) | - |
| Single | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | |
|
| 2.00 ± 0.96 | 2.63 ± 1.60 | 0.07 [ |
|
| 1.00 [ | ||
| Wife | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | |
| Wife and children | 26 (50.0) | 26 (50.0) | |
| Parents | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | |
|
| 0.33 [ | ||
| Yes | 0 (0) | 1 (100.0) | |
| No | 28 (49.1) | 29 (50.9) | |
|
| 0.59 [ | ||
| One lower extremity | |||
| Above knee | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | |
| Through knee | 0 (0) | 1 (100.0) | |
| Below knee | 18 (48.6) | 19 (51.4) | |
| Two lower extremity | |||
| Below knee | 1 (25.0) | 3 (75.0) | |
| One below and one above knee | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0) | |
| Concurrent amputation of the lower extremities and other handicaps | 8 (61.5) | 5 (38.5) | |
|
| 0.15 [ | ||
| 0% - 25% | 2 (100.0) | 0 (0) | |
| 26% - 49% | 11 (57.9) | 8 (42.1) | |
| 50% - 75% | 14 (41.2) | 20 (58.8) | |
| 75% < | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | |
|
| 23.35 ± 7.14 | 21.35 ±8.90 | 0.34 [ |
|
| 0.79 [ | ||
| Yes | 16 (51.6) | 15 (48.4) | |
| No | 14 (48.3) | 15 (51.7) | |
|
| 6.60 ± 2.55 | 6.77 ± 2.70 | 0.80 [ |
|
| 0.48 [ | ||
| Yes | 24 (48.0) | 26 (52.0) | |
| No | 6 (60.0) | 4 (40.0) | |
|
| 30 | 30 |
aData are presented as No. (%) or mean ± SD.
bIndependent t-test.
cFisher’s exact test.
dChi-squared test.
The Mean and Standard Deviation of Adaptation and the Four Modes in the Two Groups[a]
| Modes of Adaptation | Group | Independent Sample t-test (P Value) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | ||
|
| |||
| Physiologic | 56.33 ± 7.60 | 54.23 ± 8.37 | 0.31 |
| Self-concept | 41.23 ± 4.98 | 39.23 ± 6.21 | 0.17 |
| Role function | 19.03 ± 2.57 | 18.13 ± 3.80 | 0.28 |
| Interdependence | 17.03 ± 2.25 | 16.73 ± 2.61 | 0.63 |
| Total adaptation score | 133.63 ± 12.49 | 128.33 ± 17.34 | 0.18 |
|
| |||
| Physiologic | 60.26 ± 5.45 | 53.73 ± 7.79 | 0.0001 [ |
| Self-concept | 42.10 ± 4.71 | 39.40 ± 5.67 | 0.05 |
| Role function | 20.30 ± 2.42 | 18.13 ± 3.18 | 0.004 [ |
| Interdependence | 16.76 ± 2.22 | 16.30 ± 2.57 | 0.45 |
| Total adaptation score | 139.43 ± 10.87 | 127.56 ± 14.55 | 0.001 [ |
aData are presented as mean ± SD.
bSignificant at the P < 0.05.