| Literature DB >> 26568757 |
Ashraf Kazemi1, Fatemeh Ramezanzadeh2, Mohammad Hosein Nasr-Esfahani3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress (OS) in the follicular environment may affect on oocyte competence and antioxidant vitamins may modify its effects.Entities:
Keywords: Assisted reproduction; Embryo quality; Fertilization; Oxidative stress; Vitamin A; Vitamin C; Vitamin E
Year: 2015 PMID: 26568757 PMCID: PMC4637120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Reprod Med ISSN: 1680-6433
Personal details, the level of the vitamin intake, and ART parameters in subjects
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Age (year) | 31.54 ±5.45 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.60 ±4.33 |
| Duration of infertility (year) | 7.42±5.14 |
|
| |
| Anovulation | 40.64 |
| Pelvic factor | 46. 58 |
| Hypothalamic amenorrhea | 5.48 |
| Unexplained infertility | 7.30 |
|
| |
| Vitamin A (µg/d) | 1445.90 ±1684.50 |
| Vitamin C (mg/d) | 81.38±79.86 |
| Vitamin E (mg/d) | 22.84±18.45 |
|
| |
| MDA (µ mol/lit) | 0.98±0.29 |
| TAC (molar Trolox equivalents) | 1987.73±354.08 |
|
| |
| Used gonadotropin (n) | 40.54±1.72 |
| Retrieved oocytes (n) | 11.95±9.11 |
| Fertilization rate (%) | 62.60 ±27.10 |
| Non-fragmented embryo rate (%) | 44.81±36.21 |
| Number of blastomers | 6.13±2.44 |
| Normal cleavage rate (%) | 71.50±36.60 |
| Good quality embryo rate (%) | 47.14±34.01 |
BMI: Body mass index, MDA: Malondialdehyde, TAC: Total antioxidant capacity, ART: Assisted reproductive technology.
The correlation between dietary vitamin intake levels, oxidative stress markers and assisted reproduction parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| -0.11 | -5.7 | 0.9 | 0.04 | -8.5 | 9.5 | -0.1 | -0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 12 | 0.07 | -2.2 | 0.03 | 0.79 | -9.2 | 16.1 |
|
| 0.12 | -0.6 | 5.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 10 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 13.1 | 0.09 | -5.4 | 18.9 | 0.02 | -2.4 | 21.1 |
|
| -0.03 | -5.4 | 3.6 | -0.1 | -17 | 5.4 | 0.02 | -0.2 | 0.3 | -0.1 | -13 | 5.9 | -0.07 | -20 | 10.3 | 0.01 | -10 | 10.2 |
|
| -0.8 | -0.7 | 2.2 | -0.1 | -1 | 10.7 | -0.1 | -0.4 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -33 | 0.14 | -0.08 | -31 | 9.2 | -0.06 | -18 | 13.8 |
|
| -0.3 | -0.01 | 0.003 | 0.06 | -0.01 | 0.01 | -0.1 | -0.09 | 0.01 | -0.02 | -0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 | -.01 | 0.02 | 0.08 | -0.01 | 0.02 |
CI: Confidence Interval, Beta: Standardized coefficient, MDA: Malondialdehyde, TAC: Total antioxidant capacity, MII: metaphase II.
p<0.05;
p=.02 (Multiple regression analysis)
Comparison of oxidative stress markers and ART parameters by dietary vitamin intake categorisations
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 147 | 72 | 149 | 70 | 163 | 56 | |||
|
| 0.99± 0.27 | 0.98± .31 | 0.55 | 0.97± 0.96 | 1.03± 0.82 | 0.17 | 0.99± 0.27 | 0.96± 0.33 | 0.21 |
|
| 1999.00± 345 | 1962± 375 | 0.21 | 1957.01± 380.02 | 2050.00± 283.11 | 0.04 | 1997.01± 343.11 | 1957± 387 | 0.15 |
|
| 12.11± 8.72 | 11.7± 9.60 | 0.19 | 11.81±9.03 | 12.90± 9.28 | 0.38 | 12.10± 9.41 | 11.6± 8.40 | 0.35 |
|
| 82.00± 23.92 | 83.5± 15.51 | 0.20 | 79.01 ± 25.22 | 87.13± 14.81 | 0.008 | 83.24± 22.22 | 80.4± 23.70 | 0.20 |
|
| 65.62± 64.11 | 65.5± 63.41 | 0.28 | 60.31± 28.71 | 71.72± 22.41 | 0.04 | 64.9 ± 26.60 | 67.4± 29.30 | 0.09 |
|
| 71.62± 36.21 | 81.9± 27.41 | 0.02 | 73.00± 35.31 | 80.5± 34.41 | 0.36 | 75.50± 34.23 | 73.5± 33.70 | 0.17 |
|
| 48.32± 36.90 | 52.11± 38.70 | 0.12 | 46.20± 36.51 | 55.80±34.40 | 0.18 | 49.13± 38.41 | 50.8± 35.10 | 0.36 |
|
| 45.00± 35.32 | 50.2± 37.51 | 0.10 | 43.11± 35.42 | 56.21± 35.81 | 0.02 | 45.60± 35.81 | 49.92± 37.31 | 0.07 |
All data were presented as Mean±SD. ANOVA test.
ART: Assisted reproductive technology, MDA: Malondialdehyde, TAC: Total antioxidant capacity, MII: metaphase II.