Literature DB >> 26568593

Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibition in Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Treatment Response, Drug Survival, and Patient Outcome.

Justine Corli1, René-Marc Flipo1, Peggy Philippe1, Anne Bera-Louville1, Hélène Béhal1, Cécile Wibaux1, Julien Paccou2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate baseline characteristics of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi), (2) assess the response to first TNFi treatment, and (3) compare drug-survival duration and rates.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were patients with axSpA who initiated first TNFi treatment between April 2001 and July 2014 and were followed up for at least 3 months. Efficacy criteria were an improvement of at least 2 points (on a 0-10 scale) or a 50% improvement in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Baseline characteristics, responses at 12 months, and drug survival were compared between AS and nr-axSpA.
RESULTS: A total of 361 patients were included in the study (AS, n = 263 and nr-axSpA, n = 98). Patients with AS were more often men (65.02% vs 45.92%, p = 0.001) and had longer symptom duration (11.71 ± 9.52 vs 7.34 ± 9.30 yrs, p < 0.001). Median levels of acute-phase reactants (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) were significantly higher in patients with AS (p < 0.001 for both). Median BASDAI scores at first TNFi initiation were not higher in patients with nr-axSpA than in patients with AS (59, 49-70 vs 60, 50-70, p = 0.73). BASDAI 20 and BASDAI 50 response rates at 12 months were not statistically different between patients with AS and patients with nr-axSpA (74.58% vs 64.58%, p = 0.19 and 61.02% vs 50.00%, p = 0.19, respectively). No statistically significant difference in terms of survival was observed between patients with AS and nr-axSpA (p = 1.00).
CONCLUSION: Treatment response and drug survival were similar in patients with AS and nr-axSpA after first TNFi initiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS; DRUG SURVIVAL; NONRADIOGRAPHIC AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS; TNF-α INHIBITION; TREATMENT RESPONSE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26568593     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  8 in total

1.  [Long version on the S3 guidelines for axial spondyloarthritis including Bechterew's disease and early forms, Update 2019 : Evidence-based guidelines of the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) and participating medical scientific specialist societies and other organizations].

Authors:  U Kiltz; J Braun; A Becker; J-F Chenot; M Dreimann; L Hammel; A Heiligenhaus; K-G Hermann; R Klett; D Krause; K-F Kreitner; U Lange; A Lauterbach; W Mau; R Mössner; U Oberschelp; S Philipp; U Pleyer; M Rudwaleit; E Schneider; T L Schulte; J Sieper; A Stallmach; B Swoboda; M Winking
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  The Efficacy of Imrecoxib and Celecoxib in Axial Spondyloarthritis and Their Influence on Serum Dickopff-Related Protein 1 (DKK-1) Levels.

Authors:  Guan-Min Gao; Yan-Min Li; Xiao-Long Zheng; Dong-Bin Jiang; Lei-Lei Zhang; Peng-Hui Xu; Sheng-Yun Liu; Zhao-Hui Zheng; Quan-Cheng Kan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-06-19

3.  Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ulf Lindström; Tor Olofsson; Sara Wedrén; Ilia Qirjazo; Johan Askling
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 4.  An appraisal of golimumab in the treatment of severe, active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Julien Paccou; René-Marc Flipo
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Retention rates of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab as first- or second-line biotherapies for spondyloarthritis patients in daily practice in Auvergne (France).

Authors:  Martin Soubrier; Bruno Pereira; Angelique Fan; Thomas Frayssac; Marion Couderc; Sandrine Malochet-Guinamand; Sylvain Mathieu; Zuzana Tatar; Anne Tournadre; Jean-Jacques Dubost
Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.454

6.  Non-radiographic versus radiographic axSpA: what's in a name?

Authors:  Xabier Michelena; Clementina López-Medina; Helena Marzo-Ortega
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Similar biologic drug response regardless of radiographic status in axial spondyloarthritis: data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis registry.

Authors:  Xabier Michelena; Sizheng Steven Zhao; Sayam Dubash; Linda E Dean; Gareth T Jones; Helena Marzo-Ortega
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 7.580

8.  Current differentiation between radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis is of limited benefit for prediction of important clinical outcomes: data from a large, prospective, observational cohort.

Authors:  Adrian Ciurea; Seraphina Kissling; Kristina Bürki; Xenofon Baraliakos; Manouk de Hooge; Monika Hebeisen; Eleftherios Papagiannoulis; Pascale Exer; René Bräm; Michael J Nissen; Burkhard Möller; Diego Kyburz; Michael Andor; Oliver Distler; Almut Scherer; Raphael Micheroli
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.