Literature DB >> 26567205

Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information.

Shahla Wunderlich1, Kelsey A Gatto2.   

Abstract

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been available for commercial purchase since the 1990s, allowing producers to increase crop yields through bioengineering that creates herbicide-resistant and insect-resistant varieties. However, consumer knowledge about GMOs has not increased at the same rate as the adoption of GMO crops. Consumers worldwide are displaying limited understanding, misconceptions, and even unfamiliarity with GMO food products. Many consumers report that they receive information about GMO food products from the media, Internet, and other news sources. These sources may be less reliable than scientific experts whom consumers trust more to present the facts. Although many in the United States support mandatory GMO labeling (similar to current European standards), consumer awareness of current GMO labeling is low. A distinction must also be made between GMO familiarity and scientific understanding, because those who are more familiar with it tend to be more resistant to bioengineering, whereas those with higher scientific knowledge scores tend to have less negative attitudes toward GMOs. This brings to question the relation between scientific literacy, sources of information, and overall consumer knowledge and perception of GMO foods.
© 2015 American Society for Nutrition.

Keywords:  GMOs; awareness; genetic engineering; genetically modified organisms; knowledge; labeling

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26567205      PMCID: PMC4642419          DOI: 10.3945/an.115.008870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  7 in total

1.  Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States.

Authors:  John T Lang; William K Hallman
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 2.  What do consumer surveys and experiments reveal and conceal about consumer preferences for genetically modified foods?

Authors:  Gregory Colson; Matthew C Rousu
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.074

3.  Uninformed and disinformed society and the GMO market.

Authors:  Tomasz Twardowski; Aleksandra Małyska
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  Factors influencing U.S. consumer support for genetic modification to prevent crop disease.

Authors:  Katherine A McComas; John C Besley; Joseph Steinhardt
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  The role of scientific knowledge in shaping public attitudes to GM technologies.

Authors:  Henrik Mielby; Peter Sandøe; Jesper Lassen
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2012-01-23

Review 6.  A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants.

Authors:  José L Domingo; Jordi Giné Bordonaba
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Emotional attitudes of young people completing secondary schools towards genetic modification of organisms (GMO) and genetically modified foods (GMF).

Authors:  Anna Jurkiewicz; Jerzy Zagórski; Franciszek Bujak; Stanisław Lachowski; Magdalena Florek-Łuszczki
Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.447

  7 in total
  31 in total

1.  Problem formulation and phenotypic characterisation for the development of novel crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Genetically Modified Plants: Nutritious, Sustainable, yet Underrated.

Authors:  Kendal D Hirschi
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Motoko Araki
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  Identification and quantitation of genetically modified (GM) ingredients in maize, rice, soybean and wheat-containing retail foods and feeds in Turkey.

Authors:  Aydin Turkec; Stuart J Lucas; Bihter Avsar; Sahl Sadeghi
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 5.  Regulatory policy on genetically modified breeding stack in key countries and the current status in Korea.

Authors:  Su-Yeon Sul; Seung-Man Suh; Saet-Byul Park; Hae-Yeong Kim
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 2.391

Review 6.  Faba Bean: An Untapped Source of Quality Plant Proteins and Bioactives.

Authors:  Delphine Martineau-Côté; Allaoua Achouri; Salwa Karboune; Lamia L'Hocine
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.706

7.  Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Motoko Araki
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.570

8.  Prospects and challenges for cell-cultured fat as a novel food ingredient.

Authors:  Kyle D Fish; Natalie R Rubio; Andrew J Stout; John S K Yuen; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Trends Food Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 12.563

9.  Consumer intention to purchase GM soybean oil in China: effects of information consistency and source credibility.

Authors:  Mingyang Zhang; Zihao Chen; Yubing Fan; Zhiqiang Cheng; Ting Lv; Yuling Chen
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 10.  Applications and Major Achievements of Genome Editing in Vegetable Crops: A Review.

Authors:  Young-Cheon Kim; Yeeun Kang; Eun-Young Yang; Myeong-Cheoul Cho; Roland Schafleitner; Jeong Hwan Lee; Seonghoe Jang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.