Literature DB >> 26566991

A Psychometric Review of Measures Assessing Discrimination Against Sexual Minorities.

Todd G Morrison1, C J Bishop1, Melanie A Morrison1, Kandice Parker-Taneo1.   

Abstract

Discrimination against sexual minorities is widespread and has deleterious consequences on victims' psychological and physical wellbeing. However, a review of the psychometric properties of instruments measuring lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) discrimination has not been conducted. The results of this review, which involved evaluating 162 articles, reveal that most have suboptimal psychometric properties. Specifically, myriad scales possess questionable content validity as (1) items are not created in collaboration with sexual minorities; (2) measures possess a small number of items and, thus, may not sufficiently represent the domain of interest; and (3) scales are "adapted" from measures designed to examine race- and gender-based discrimination. Additional limitations include (1) summed scores are computed, often in the absence of scale score reliability metrics; (2) summed scores operate from the questionable assumption that diverse forms of discrimination are necessarily interrelated; (3) the dimensionality of instruments presumed to consist of subscales is seldom tested; (4) tests of criterion-related validity are routinely omitted; and (5) formal tests of measures' construct validity are seldom provided, necessitating that one infer validity based on the results obtained. The absence of "gold standard" measures, the attendant difficulty in formulating a coherent picture of this body of research, and suggestions for psychometric improvements are noted.

Keywords:  Discrimination; gay men; lesbian women; psychometric; sexual minority; stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26566991     DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1117903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Homosex        ISSN: 0091-8369


  9 in total

1.  Sexual Minority Stressors and Intimate Partner Violence Among Same-Sex Couples: Commitment as a Resource.

Authors:  Xiaomin Li; Melissa A Curran; Emily Butler; W Roger Mills-Koonce; Hongjian Cao
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  Measuring the impact of legal recognition of same-sex marriage among sexual minority women.

Authors:  Laurie A Drabble; Amy A Mericle; Angie R Wootton; Cat Munroe; Libo Li; Karen F Trocki; Tonda Hughes
Journal:  J GLBT Fam Stud       Date:  2021-06-07

3.  Methodological Considerations for Advancing Research on the Health and Wellbeing of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth.

Authors:  Sheree M Schrager; Riley J Steiner; Alida M Bouris; Kathryn Macapagal; C Hendricks Brown
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Criterion and Divergent Validity of the Sexual Minority Adolescent Stress Inventory.

Authors:  Jeremy T Goldbach; Sheree M Schrager; Mary R Mamey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-28

5.  Development of the Sexual Minority Adolescent Stress Inventory.

Authors:  Sheree M Schrager; Jeremy T Goldbach; Mary Rose Mamey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-15

6.  Adolescent stress experiences over time study (ASETS) protocol: design and methods of a prospective longitudinal study of sexual minority adolescents in the USA.

Authors:  Sheree M Schrager; Mary Rose Mamey; Harmony Rhoades; Jeremy T Goldbach
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Minority Stress and Loneliness in a Global Sample of Sexual Minority Adults: The Roles of Social Anxiety, Social Inhibition, and Community Involvement.

Authors:  Eddy M Elmer; Theo van Tilburg; Tineke Fokkema
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-01-27

8.  Lifetime Prevalence and Sociodemographic Correlates of Multifactorial Discrimination Among Middle-Aged and Older Adult Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Steven P Meanley; Michael W Plankey; Derrick D Matthews; Mary E Hawk; James E Egan; Linda A Teplin; Steven J Shoptaw; Pamela J Surkan; Ron D Stall
Journal:  J Homosex       Date:  2019-12-20

9.  Effect of Discrimination on Presenteeism among Aging Workers in the United States: Moderated Mediation Effect of Positive and Negative Affect.

Authors:  Jianwei Deng; Yuangeng Guo; Hubin Shi; Yongchuang Gao; Xuan Jin; Yexin Liu; Tianan Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.