Literature DB >> 26566781

Working time of neurosurgical residents in Europe--results of a multinational survey.

Martin N Stienen1, David Netuka2, Andreas K Demetriades3, Florian Ringel4, Oliver P Gautschi5, Jens Gempt4, Dominique Kuhlen6, Karl Schaller5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of the European Working Time directive 2003/88/EC has led to a reduction of the working hours with distinct impact on the clinical and surgical activity of neurosurgical residents in training.
METHODS: A survey was performed among European neurosurgical residents between 06/2014 and 03/2015. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between responder-specific variables (e.g., age, gender, country, postgraduate year (PGY)) and outcome (e.g., working time).
RESULTS: A total of 652 responses were collected, of which n = 532 responses were taken into consideration. In total, 17.5, 22.1, 29.5, 19.5, 5.9, and 5.5 % of European residents indicated to work <40, 40-50, 51-60, 61-70, 71-80, or >80 h/week, respectively. Residents from France and Turkey (OR 4.72, 95 % CI 1.29-17.17, p = 0.019) and Germany (OR 2.06, 95 % CI 1.15-3.67, p = 0.014) were more likely to work >60 h/week than residents from other European countries. In total, 29 % of European residents were satisfied with their current working time, 11.3 % indicated to prefer reduced working time. More than half (55 %) would prefer to work more hours/week if this would improve their clinical education. Residents that rated their operative exposure as insufficient were 2.3 times as likely as others to be willing to work more hours (OR 2.32, 95 % CI 1.47-3.70, p < 0.001). Less than every fifth European resident spends >50 % of his/her working time in the operating room. By contrast, 77.4 % indicate to devote >25 % of their daily working time to administrative work. For every advanced PGY, the likelihood to spend >50 % of the working time in the OR increases by 19 % (OR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.02-1.40, p = 0.024) and the likelihood to spend >50 % of the working time with administrative work decreases by 18 % (OR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.76-0.94, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey on >500 European neurosurgical residents clearly prove that less than 40 % conform with the 48-h week as claimed by the WTD2003/88/EC. Still, more than half of them would chose to work even more hours/week if their clinical education were to improve; probably due to subjective impression of insufficient training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  European working time directive; Future; Neurosurgery; Neurosurgical training; Resident education

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26566781     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-015-2633-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  6 in total

1.  The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Young Neurosurgeons Survey (Part I): Demographics, Resources, and Education.

Authors:  Sujit Gnanakumar; Bilal Abou El Ela Bourquin; Faith C Robertson; Davi J Fontoura Solla; Claire Karekezi; Kerry Vaughan; Roxanna M Garcia; Fahd Derkaoui Hassani; Alexander Alamri; Julius Höhne; Nesrine Mentri; Martin Stienen; Tsegazeab Laeke; Luis Rafael Moscote-Salazar; Ahmed Nasser Al-Ahmari; Hosam Al-Jehani; Federico Nicolosi; Nicolás Samprón; P David Adelson; Franco Servadei; Ignatius N Esene; Amro Al-Habib; Angelos G Kolias
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-05-19

2.  Comparing Anesthesiology Residency Training Structure and Requirements in Seven Different Countries on Three Continents.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamamoto; Pedro Tanaka; Matias V Madsen; Alex Macario
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-02-26

3.  Safety of resident training in the microsurgical resection of intracranial tumors: Data from a prospective registry of complications and outcome.

Authors:  Flavio Vasella; Julia Velz; Marian C Neidert; Stephanie Henzi; Johannes Sarnthein; Niklaus Krayenbühl; Oliver Bozinov; Luca Regli; Martin N Stienen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Access to training in neurosurgery (Part 1): Global perspectives and contributing factors of barriers to access.

Authors:  Kwadwo Sarpong; Tarig Fadalla; Deen L Garba; Mazin Suliman; Myron Rolle; Adam Ammar; Haytham Hussen; Kee B Park
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  Transformation of neurosurgical training from "see one, do one, teach one" to AR/VR & simulation - A survey by the EANS Young Neurosurgeons.

Authors:  Felix C Stengel; Maria L Gandia-Gonzalez; Cristina C Aldea; Jiri Bartek; Diogo Belo; Netanel Ben-Shalom; María F De la Cerda-Vargas; Evangelos Drosos; Christian F Freyschlag; Stanislav Kaprovoy; Milan Lepic; Laura Lippa; Katrin Rabiei; Giovanni Raffa; Bayron A Sandoval-Bonilla; Michael Schwake; Toma Spiriev; Cesare Zoia; Martin N Stienen
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-08-15

Review 6.  The impact of surgical simulation on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Trym R Meling; Torstein R Meling
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.042

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.